Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump) Who Will Be The 2016 Republican Nominee? (It's Donald Trump)

02-25-2016 , 05:32 PM
I'd cash out right after TRUMP clinches the nom at anything better than 3.5. You need to cash out before the GE matchup polling with Clinton makes it obvious how much of a dog TRUMP is.

MJKidd makes an interesting point that TRUMP will prob shorten to 2.5 at some time during the cycle, but you can buy back your shares once TRUMP lengthens in the weeks after he clinches.

To convert the odds, 2-1 is equivalent to 3.0.
02-25-2016 , 05:34 PM
some new howard stern stuff out re: trump. CNN played some what I consider pretty tame stuff.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczyn...ar#.qkBQ7gQgY8

but the suggestion was it could be a big deal in the ladies vote. I haven't read the article yet.

ok i read it, i dont see anything that bad but it bored me so i didnt read that hard.

Last edited by anatta; 02-25-2016 at 05:43 PM.
02-25-2016 , 05:35 PM
Naw, cash out right after the Republican convention, corresponding with the post-convention bounce.
02-25-2016 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
The few republicans who aren't insane, racists, or religious fanatics should just endorse Hillary.
I already did.
02-25-2016 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Frank Thorp VVerified account
‏@frankthorpNBC
Sen Graham on seeing GOP moving towards nominating Trump: "I am like on the team that bought a ticket on the Titanic after we saw the movie"
Lindsey seems thrilled with recent developments.
02-25-2016 , 05:46 PM
Lindsay G should claim some responsibility for helping create the environment primed for Trump.
02-25-2016 , 05:47 PM
I'm thinking it is a good thing for Trump toward earning the nom that in the last 2 days:

- dude from china came out against trump
and
- ex mexico prez says mexico is 'not paying for a fu**ing wall'

I think that is the stuff trump followers are going to eat up.
02-25-2016 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anatta
some new howard stern stuff out re: trump. CNN played some what I consider pretty tame stuff.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczyn...ar#.qkBQ7gQgY8

but the suggestion was it could be a big deal in the ladies vote. I haven't read the article yet.

ok i read it, i dont see anything that bad but it bored me so i didnt read that hard.
Seems really tame and not newsworthy.
02-25-2016 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbojumpback
I'm thinking it is a good thing for Trump toward earning the nom that in the last 2 days:

- dude from china came out against trump
and
- ex mexico prez says mexico is 'not paying for a fu**ing wall'

I think that is the stuff trump followers are going to eat up.
Stuff like this that potentially appeals to the lowest common Trumpeteer doesn't really say much about swaying people who don't already follow Trump. We know had had the knee jerk xenophobic bigot demo locked up.
02-25-2016 , 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMcNasty
I'm pretty sure the left has been mocking/shaming/denouncing Trump more than every other candidate in the race combined. This is despite the fact that Hillary and Bernie do relatively well against him heads up in the polls.
Can't speak for everyone obv but I'm left of center, a registered republican and will 100% be voting for Trump in FL.
02-25-2016 , 05:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 425kid
Lindsey seems thrilled with recent developments.
it is gonna be SWEET to watch those guys either:

- lose whatever is left of their dignity and get behind trump
or
- lose whatever is left of their dignity and (at least half heartedly) support hrc
02-25-2016 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grue
Seems really tame and not newsworthy.
Your wang is showing.

Yeah- it's a lot of garden variety misogyny and if this was just "Boorish Oaf of a Celeb says dumb ****" then it might not be newsworthy. This guys is like- running for President. Against a woman. It's newsworthy.
(and if you think it's "tame" you kinda suck).
02-25-2016 , 05:59 PM
Military victim of "LGBT intolerance" in a new Cruz video turned out not to be fired for his support of traditional marriage, but just rotated out as per the usual.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2...rsecution.html
02-25-2016 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Can't speak for everyone obv but I'm left of center, a registered republican and will 100% be voting for Trump in FL.
Where do you think the center is?
02-25-2016 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Can't speak for everyone obv but I'm left of center, a registered republican and will 100% be voting for Trump in FL.
Care to elaborate as to why, and specifically as to why his bigotry isn't an issue for you?
02-25-2016 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
I'd cash out right after TRUMP clinches the nom at anything better than 3.5. You need to cash out before the GE matchup polling with Clinton makes it obvious how much of a dog TRUMP is.

MJKidd makes an interesting point that TRUMP will prob shorten to 2.5 at some time during the cycle, but you can buy back your shares once TRUMP lengthens in the weeks after he clinches.

To convert the odds, 2-1 is equivalent to 3.0.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Naw, cash out right after the Republican convention, corresponding with the post-convention bounce.
Thanks guys.
02-25-2016 , 06:03 PM
Just saw a Hillary ad with Morgan Freeman doing the voice-over. Obvious tagline for the GE:"Get busy voting or get busy dying."
02-25-2016 , 06:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaomai888
for goofy and maxtower whoever else fell for the "mexicans make $18/hr in Georgia and lazy Americans still won't do those jobs thats why we need migrant labor!" propaganda

http://www.politifact.com/georgia/st...es-not-all-do/
1. Literally the title of that Politifact article, "Some farm workers do earn high wages, but not all do", confirms the original statement that skilled workers can earn above minimum wage
2. It's really amusing that of multiple points brought up in the post containing that statement, the only one you can even respond to (several times, like, you can't shut up about it) is an edited in footnote
3. You tried to argue that immigrants are taking too many minimum wage jobs, leaving not enough for Americans, and as I originally said it's still a fact that lazy Americans don't want some of those minimum wage jobs
4. You're bad at posting and should stop
02-25-2016 , 06:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisV
A lot of this makes no sense to me, for starters "money line" doesn't mean what you apparently think it does...
LOL@ U !!!1! FYI: I bet baseball for living for 10+ years. Anyhoo, here's where we're at today...

2016-2-25538 AvePredictitw/10% feePaddy Power+EV per 538
Trump38.4%73¢-300-250> +161
Cruz19.4%+1195+3300> +416
Rubio15.8%24¢+285+200> +533
Carson7.8%----+15000> +1183
Kasich7.8%+2900+3300> +1183
Ryan--+2900+10000yes
Romney------+10000yes
(other)10.2%----(by request)yes

Quote:
... Politics betting is done mostly on betting markets because, for a number of reasons, politics lines on books tend to have high juice and small betting maximums. You can frequently get reasonable money down on markets...
Well no, the juice is always higher on the markets, much higher. Notice above, the only horse Predictit is offering better odds on is Rubio +285 vs +200... and that's not close to +ev per the 538 Average. As for betting dimes... well I have no idea what PP's limits are... but let's say it's $500. I pop Rubio for the limit, they maybe move him to +150. I pop it again, and get him at a weighted average of +175. If I wanna buy $1000 of action on this market. What's a good approximation of my weighted average? Right before the game 'goes off', so to speak?

Last edited by Shame Trolly !!!1!; 02-25-2016 at 06:21 PM.
02-25-2016 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorKeeed
Naw, cash out right after the Republican convention, corresponding with the post-convention bounce.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Csaba
Thanks guys.
Adanthar demonstrated in past cycles that buying and holding that long is a really bad idea, the key to making money is to time the market and look for opportunities for short term scores. MJKidd's strat might work, but if Clinton jumps out to a huge lead by the conventions you're gonna lose money. OTOH, if you think TRUMP will shorten due to the convention, you can profit twice, once by selling soon and then by rebuying and selling again after the convention with the added assurance that you won't lose by hanging on to losing shares during the spring.
02-25-2016 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
It's funny that Republicans don't understand their base hates their own establishment more than they hate Obama and Hillary right now.

Chances of winning the general?

Trump > Cruz > Rubio
No way Cruz isn't last on that list by a long way.

Trump > Rubio is questionable. If Trump can't pivot or un-piss-off most democrats somehow, Rubio is a better but. But Trump is a wild card so he may have a higher ceiling than Rubio.
02-25-2016 , 06:16 PM
So when is the whole "Messicans are taking our jerbs!!!!!" meme going to turn to "Masheeeens taking our jerbs!!!!!"?

http://www.businessinsider.com/exper...-robots-2015-5
02-25-2016 , 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
It's funny that Republicans don't understand their base hates their own establishment more than they hate Obama and Hillary right now.

Chances of winning the general?

Trump > Cruz > Rubio
even though it's looking like think TRUMP is virtually a done deal for the gop at this point, i think rubio would have a better shot in the GE than TRUMP vs. hrc.

i know as a dem, he's my least preferred opponent.
02-25-2016 , 06:21 PM
Heres an interesting article that examines how the non-religiously affiliated may have a chance to swing the GE the democrats way, even if non traditionally affiliated with religion Trump is the republican party contender, including this graph which shows his unfavorability rating amongst nones at a whopping 73%



http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendl...ng-vote-again/
02-25-2016 , 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
So when is the whole "Messicans are taking our jerbs!!!!!" meme going to turn to "Masheeeens taking our jerbs!!!!!"?

http://www.businessinsider.com/exper...-robots-2015-5

As a GOP talking point? You must be kidding.

      
m