Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee? Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee?

03-13-2012 , 06:56 PM
And again id like to point out Republicans need to stay away from the foreign affairs when attacking Obama. He just isnt weak on it at all to anyone they could ever hope to sway to their side.
03-13-2012 , 06:57 PM
Maybe I should clarify my base case which is Israel doesn't know if the administration has its back or a plan.
03-13-2012 , 06:57 PM
Well, we've all but answered the thread's title. It's basically a Obama/Romney GE thread at this point.
03-13-2012 , 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Maybe I should clarify my base case which is Israel doesn't know if the administration has its back or a plan.
How would you know?
03-13-2012 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Maybe I should clarify my base case which is Israel doesn't know if the administration has its back or a plan.
this probably reduces their chances of attacking no?

and lol @ at Israel not knowing this
03-13-2012 , 06:59 PM
Didnt the Israeli leader visit America last week and talk about how close he and Obama were on the Iran issue?
03-13-2012 , 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
How would you know?
Fair point, i don't and obviously a lot of things are done behind the scenes. Lets say that the administration and Israel are acting in concert and everything being said is the ideal course of action Could we now say that Obama has had some recent affect on the price of oil?
03-13-2012 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
what about the stock market then?
Turns out it was great that Bush personally destroyed the stock market because that means he also directly lowered gas prices! Unemployment is good when it means boa can get cheap gas!
03-13-2012 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Fair point, i don't and obviously a lot of things are done behind the scenes. Lets say that the administration and Israel are acting in concert and everything being said is the ideal course of action Could we now say that Obama has had some recent affect on the price of oil?
It still seems weird to blame Obama when Iran's saber rattling is much more obviously to blame.
03-13-2012 , 07:04 PM
I hear Obama likes Missouri and Ohio State in his final four. You heard it here first bitches.
03-13-2012 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Maybe I should clarify my base case which is Israel doesn't know if the administration has its back or a plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barack Obama May 7, 2012
Our commitment to the security of Israel is rock solid. The United States will always have Israel's back.
Maybe your base case is Israel is run by anti-Obama zealots that don't follow the news?
03-13-2012 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Maybe I should clarify my base case which is seattlelou doesn't know if the administration has Israel's back or a plan.
.
03-13-2012 , 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barack Obama May 7, 2012
Our commitment to the security of Israel is rock solid. The United States will always have Israel's back.
Yeah this guy never lies. He never bends the truth. You can take his words to the bank. Ha ha ha

The US is behind Israel. It is questionable whether Obama is behind Israel.
03-13-2012 , 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
this probably reduces their chances of attacking no?

and lol @ at Israel not knowing this
No, Israel does not have the same capabilities to disrupt the Iran's nuclear ambition and their timetable to act is shorter than the US's.
I follow the currency markets closely and the underlying perception is that the US has no idea what to do and there is considerable conflict between Israel, Panetta, Clinton and the Obama political apparatus. I don't follow oil but the same factors are in play.
03-13-2012 , 07:16 PM
big fan of the implicit expertise in the oil markets that so many of you seem to possess
03-13-2012 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
No, Israel does not have the same capabilities to disrupt the Iran's nuclear ambition and their timetable to act is shorter than the US's.
I follow the currency markets closely and the underlying perception is that the US has no idea what to do and there is considerable conflict between Israel, Panetta, Clinton and the Obama political apparatus. I don't follow oil but the same factors are in play.
I meant that if true it reduces the chance that Israel will attack

I've seen no evidence that Iran will attack anyone

P.S. Israel has done more to disrupt it than the U.S. has done, and in many ways it is better situated in terms of not starting a war (stuxnet etc.)
03-13-2012 , 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]
Didnt the Israeli leader visit America last week and talk about how close he and Obama were on the Iran issue?
Which he totally backed off on as soon as Bibi was wheels up. A week of solidarity would have been nice.
03-13-2012 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
I meant that if true it reduces the chance that Israel will attack

I've seen no evidence that Iran will attack anyone
So did I. Israel has to attack months earlier than the US to have the same result. Do they act alone or hope the US will at the later date?
03-13-2012 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
So did I. Israel has to attack months earlier than the US to have the same result. Do they act alone or hope the US will at the later date?
so your thesis is that the Israel might go it alone early because if they wait and still don't have U.S. support they will be screwed? And you think this thesis is priced into oil futures?

just to make sure I have your point correct
03-13-2012 , 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Which he totally backed off on as soon as Bibi was wheels up. A week of solidarity would have been nice.
who is "he?" Netenyahu or obama
03-13-2012 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
Fair point, i don't and obviously a lot of things are done behind the scenes. Lets say that the administration and Israel are acting in concert and everything being said is the ideal course of action Could we now say that Obama has had some recent affect on the price of oil?
I suppose some perfect leader making optimal play could have an effect, but it would be trivially small. Gas prices are up because the world economy is heating up, China/India are demanding more oil, overseas oil field production is declining, and Iran is being obnoxious. Of those things, the president can maybe affect Iran, but even an optimal president can't make a huge change in what Iran does.
03-13-2012 , 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake7777
so your thesis is that the Israel might go it alone early because if they wait and still don't have U.S. support they will be screwed? And you think this thesis is priced into oil futures?

just to make sure I have your point correct
You forgot the part where even though Obama publicly and vociferously said he had Israel's back, Obama still has not articulated his exact plan to seattlelou's satisfaction, and therefore Israel obviously is obviously just as unsure.
03-13-2012 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
You forgot the part where even though Obama publicly and vociferously said he had Israel's back, Obama still has not articulated his exact plan to seattlelou's satisfaction, and therefore Israel obviously is obviously just as unsure.
So I guess we have at least moved from Obama had no recent effect on oil prices to Obama has acted perfectly and there is no premium in the market for the tensions in Iran. Like getting a Paul fan boy to indicate that the newsletters are loosely related to the campaign.
03-13-2012 , 07:37 PM
No, that's not where we've moved. But...

Quote:
Obama has acted perfectly and there is no premium in the market for the tensions in Iran.
The former can be true even if the latter is false.
03-13-2012 , 07:39 PM
Do you understand the nature of brinksmanship? You can't have it w/o uncertainty. Iran has to think a war is possible, which means the public has to think a war is possible, which means gas prices will reflect that.

Sure gas prices might come down if Obama said, "hey we're never going to invade Iran, get real people". But is that optimal overall?

      
m