Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee? Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee?

10-12-2011 , 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
Actual Rick Perry quote from a speech after his debate:

"Reason we fought the revolution in the 16th century was to get away from that kind of onerous crown"


jesus.
dude, complaining about this is ******ed. People misspeak, obama doesn't think there are 57 states.

etc
etc
10-12-2011 , 12:35 AM
not complaining; making fun of him

also....obama graduated magna cum laude from harvard law....rick perry almost flunked out of an agricultural college.
10-12-2011 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
12 for 12 does suggest a high correlation between approval ratings and re-election chances. I don't think anyone is disputing that. What we are disputing is that elections are a "thumbs up or thumbs down affair".

For instance, suppose we were doing a similar analysis but for the correlation between speed and fatalities for car crashes. However, we could only get data on 12 crashes. In 9 of those crashes, the cars were travelling above 100km/hr at the time of the crash and all occupants died. In the other 3, the cars were travelling below 100km/hr and none of the occupants died. Could we conclude that speed is correlated with car crashes? Most likely. But could we conlude that car crashes above 100km/hr are guaranteed to result in death but those below 100km/hr are guaranteed not to? Not at all. Even a weaker conclusion like "crashes are much more likely to be fatal when a car goes beyond 100km/hr" isn't supported.

The margin is important because when you're got so few data points of close elections, it provides additional information. If elections really are a "thumbs up or thumbs down affair", then approval ratings should be perfectly correlated with election margins. They aren't. If it's possible for the margins of victory of incumbents with approvals in the mid-50s to vary by double digits, then it should also be possible for candidates with approvals in the mid-40s.



And I don't think anyone's disagreeing with the bolded part either. Is it hard to win with 42% approval? Yes, very. But it's possible. And one of the ways in which it may be possible is with an opponent who is even more unpopular. Do you agree? If you do, are you repudiating the simplistic "thumbs up or thumbs down affair" mantra?
Good post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
that may be true, but either way, it reinforces the widely-held belief that he is a total buffoon.
Not so good. I'll give candidates some leeway on little **** like this. We all do something like this sometimes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
dude, complaining about this is ******ed. People misspeak, obama doesn't think there are 57 states.

etc
etc
Yep.
10-12-2011 , 12:38 AM
Obviously some Republican racists are behind Cain, without them he could not have his current numbers.
10-12-2011 , 12:41 AM
Didn't you hear, Cain is black, therefore he's getting the black vote. That's why his numbers are growing.
10-12-2011 , 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Didn't you hear, Cain is black, therefore he's getting the black vote. That's why his numbers are growing.
10-12-2011 , 12:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
not complaining; making fun of him

also....obama graduated magna cum laude from harvard law....rick perry almost flunked out of an agricultural college.
making fun of him (for that) is ******ed as well.
10-12-2011 , 12:50 AM
Rick Perry wants to educate illegal immigrants.
10-12-2011 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Rick Perry wants to educate illegal immigrants.
Broken clocks are right twice a day?
10-12-2011 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
making fun of him (for that) is ******ed as well.
yeah but its not

rick perry comes across as a total moron, far dumber even than Bush, and these terrible debates along with this inexplicable gaffe just buttress that belief.
10-12-2011 , 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
12 for 12 does suggest a high correlation between approval ratings and re-election chances. I don't think anyone is disputing that.
Fine.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
And I don't think anyone's disagreeing with the bolded part either. Is it hard to win with 42% approval? Yes, very. But it's possible. And one of the ways in which it may be possible is with an opponent who is even more unpopular. Do you agree? If you do, are you repudiating the simplistic "thumbs up or thumbs down affair" mantra?
I honestly don't know what you want me to say. Certainly, anything is possible. But according to Nate's statistical analysis using incumbent approval ratings by Gallup (Nate's methodology) if Obama's approval is 42% on election day his chances of re- election is ~20%. If Obama's approval is 40% his chances dive to ~5%. So yes... he would still have a chance, just a very outside one.

http://www.538host.com/appre4.png

And yes.... if the R's nominate Christine O'Donnell then yes, the competence of the opponent becomes a factor, but Romney is close to a lock at this point and even the most avowed leftist would have to grudgingly admit , he is a highly competent fellow. Likely, more competent than the current occupant of the White House by any objective criteria.

However, if one wants to discuss politics rationally and doesn't admit in the case of an incumbent, the vast majority of times, the election is a referendum on the incumbent, then I can only suggest one audits Polysci 101 again.
10-12-2011 , 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Davis
Is that Michael Strahan or Lauren Hutton?
10-12-2011 , 01:43 AM
Pretty sure it's Roger from What's Happening?

10-12-2011 , 01:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
I'll bet 200 bucks against your 13 that neither runs.

edit: and I'll pay if either wins the nomination.

225 to 10
10-12-2011 , 01:51 AM
204 to 10

Last edited by SenorKeeed; 10-12-2011 at 01:52 AM. Reason: and the debtor pays for postage
10-12-2011 , 01:56 AM
You best book ASAP, because I'm on Old Fashioned number 5 (Rachel Maddow's recipe, confirmed delicious), and most likely will retract offer once I sober up.
10-12-2011 , 01:56 AM
make an even 205 to 10 and it's a deal
10-12-2011 , 01:57 AM
201.5 to 10

Last edited by SenorKeeed; 10-12-2011 at 01:58 AM. Reason: debtor pays for postage AND the envelope!
10-12-2011 , 01:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LirvA
make an even 205 to 10 and it's a deal
OK boooked
10-12-2011 , 02:06 AM
Ok so mjkidd has 205 to my 10

mjkidd's side is Ron Paul or Gary Johnson won't run 3rd party if they don't get the GOP nom, and he also pays if Ron Paul or Gary Johnson gets the GOP nom.

My side is Ron Paul or Gary Johnson run 3rd party if they don't get the GOP nom


can I get a witness?!?!

Last edited by LirvA; 10-12-2011 at 02:06 AM. Reason: loser pays postage and envelope. .... wait, how bout paypal?
10-12-2011 , 02:17 AM
just ship him the money now
10-12-2011 , 02:25 AM
I don't even know what percentage that is imo. I'm horrible at math.


Can someone tell me what I got?


10-12-2011 , 02:26 AM
around like 5 percent I think ...
10-12-2011 , 02:37 AM
10/215 or 4.65% is the number you're looking for (excluding the postage and envelope)
10-12-2011 , 02:52 AM
ty sir!


I like my side. oooooh yeah.

      
m