Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
In Which We Re-Re-Re-Re-Litigate Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Election In Which We Re-Re-Re-Re-Litigate Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Election

02-02-2017 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
I don't get it. People knew what they were getting when they voted for him. It's not as if the Muslims ban, Mexican wall, sabre rattling with Iran and childish tweets came out of nowhere.

Was it a protest vote gone wrong?
clinton being terrible at politics ended up being an unbelievable disaster
02-02-2017 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
I don't get it. People knew what they were getting when they voted for him. It's not as if the Muslims ban, Mexican wall, sabre rattling with Iran and childish tweets came out of nowhere.

Was it a protest vote gone wrong?
Did you see podesta' emails about pizza?
02-02-2017 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daca
clinton being terrible at politics ended up being an unbelievable disaster
While it may seem like things are bad, please never ever forget what could have been. Do not forget that she sent e-mails.
02-02-2017 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by daca
clinton being terrible at politics ended up being an unbelievable disaster
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.

The DNC is responsible for getting Trump elected to a large extent. Clinton was the most untrustworthy, disliked candidate in recent history. She was damaged goods to be blunt.

Huge mea culpa by the DNC. They will never admit it though.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 02-02-2017 at 04:10 PM.
02-02-2017 , 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.
It's a bold move to repeat this argument at this point.
02-02-2017 , 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.

The DNC is responsible for getting Trump elected to a large extent. Clinton was the most untrustworthy, disliked candidate in recent history. She was damaged goods to be blunt.

Huge mea culpa by the DNC. They will never admit it though.
clinton would have been fine and, more importantly, boring as president. you just maybe shouldnt be doing politics when you cant connect to other people.

but yeah, whatever happened to make biden/warren/whoever not run wasnt one of the great moments in history. in hindsight, obama should have told her to **** off too after she lost the first time.
02-02-2017 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfg
It's a bold move to repeat this argument at this point.
Hardly. It's pure boilerplate Party Of Personal Responsibility stuff; everything, everywhere, always, is the fault of the nearest liberal.
02-02-2017 , 04:18 PM
Yeah I'm sure Hillary would have hung up on Australia and allowed the Russians to take over more of the Ukraine. Six of one half a dozen of the other amirite?
02-02-2017 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.

The DNC is responsible for getting Trump elected to a large extent. Clinton was the most untrustworthy, disliked candidate in recent history. She was damaged goods to be blunt.

Huge mea culpa by the DNC. They will never admit it though.
You act like the republican prelims didn't happen.
02-02-2017 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-In Flynn
Hardly. It's pure boilerplate Party Of Personal Responsibility stuff; everything, everywhere, always, is the fault of the nearest liberal.
The DNC could have run a chimpanzee and it probably would have beaten Trump.

But no, they are so arrogant that they put up the most distrusted candidate in history and expect to win in a cake walk.
02-02-2017 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.

The DNC is responsible for getting Trump elected to a large extent. Clinton was the most untrustworthy, disliked candidate in recent history. She was damaged goods to be blunt.

Huge mea culpa by the DNC. They will never admit it though.

Wow, a Trumpkin just admitted Trump is ****ty.

Three of the 5 stages of grief in this post.
02-02-2017 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life
Wow, a Trumpkin just admitted Trump is ****ty.

Three of the 5 stages of grief in this post.
He's just trolling. Of course he still has a huge boner for trump.
02-02-2017 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by m_reed05
R's are terrified of trumpkins. They know they can't win without them. Trump would have to do something truly unspeakable for them to do anything before 2018, and even then they will probably do nothing out of fear.
But they can slowly change the narrative through fox. Pieces that are mostly complimentary to trump with small negatives. Eventually that changes to small positives with huge negatives. These republican morons are easily persuaded after all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
You give voters a choice between two ****ty candidates. Guess what happens?

They choose a ****ty candidate.

The DNC is responsible for getting Trump elected to a large extent. Clinton was the most untrustworthy, disliked candidate in recent history. She was damaged goods to be blunt.

Huge mea culpa by the DNC. They will never admit it though.
Lolllll sushy has been sucking trumps Dick for as long as he's been posting about him, now calls him a ****ty candidate. Lol
02-02-2017 , 04:51 PM
When the FBI interfered illegally in the election, Russia interfered illegally in the election, and Trump was probably involved with one or both of them, there's no way we can call Trump a legitimate President until full and complete independent investigations are completed. We know these won't happen, because Trump has already basically shut those avenues down. It's pretty clear to me he's shut them down because he knows what would be exposed--that he is even more illegitimate than people already know he is.

And with all that cheating, he still lost the vote by 2,900,000 votes. That's a lot of people. I don't know about you, but to me that's absolutely taxation without representation.
02-02-2017 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
But no, they are so arrogant that they put up the most distrusted candidate in history and expect to win in a cake walk.
And the dogs in the street knew Clinton would be the candidate. So, in answer to the question "What would you attempt if you knew you couldn't fail?", the Republicans answered "Make Donald Trump President".

But yeah nah this is def 100% the fault of literally everyone on Earth except the people who voted for Trump.
02-02-2017 , 04:55 PM
People are still talking about the popular vote and electoral college? Good god people.
02-02-2017 , 04:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-In Flynn
And the dogs in the street knew Clinton would be the candidate. So, in answer to the question "What would you attempt if you knew you couldn't fail?", the Republicans answered "Make Donald Trump President".

But yeah nah this is def 100% the fault of literally everyone on Earth except the people who voted for Trump.
Trump won the Republican nomination because he out performed the other candidates.

Quite simple really.
02-02-2017 , 04:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustafson26
People are still talking about the popular vote and electoral college? Good god people.
Not just that, but also the blatant cheating the election. It's important to talk about because the election was stolen, it was very obvious, it was done right in front of all of us, but noone is willing to admit it. Even many liberal posters and personalities feel a strong internal desire for the system to be fair, for things to have gone down without foul play. People want so badly for our democratic system to be working. But it's not. It's been compromised, in multiple ways.
02-02-2017 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
The DNC could have run a chimpanzee and it probably would have beaten Trump.

But no, they are so arrogant that they put up the most distrusted candidate in history and expect to win in a cake walk.
The republicans ran like 15 chimps and they all lost to trump
02-02-2017 , 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Then the FBI cheated, Russia cheated, Trump most likely cheated, and he still lost by 2,900,000 votes but "won" by a strange fluke of a 200-year old system. Yeah he's not legitimate and we are going to continue protesting him and his minority regime until they're gone.
Lol
02-02-2017 , 05:02 PM
But the electoral college didn't compromise anything in our Republic. It's there to stay and I highly doubt it will ever be removed. You may not agree with it, but it works.
02-02-2017 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustafson26
But the electoral college didn't compromise anything in our Republic. It's there to stay and I highly doubt it will ever be removed. You may not agree with it, but it works.
"Works" how?
02-02-2017 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autocratic
"Works" how?
Gets Republicans elected - I think?
02-02-2017 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Not just that, but also the blatant cheating the election. It's important to talk about because the election was stolen, it was very obvious, it was done right in front of all of us, but noone is willing to admit it.
Could you please elucidate how the election was "stolen". I am sure Mrs. Clinton would be very interested....

I DO have a nice brown paper bag you can use to breathe into to cure your hyperventilation.

Specifics, please.
02-02-2017 , 05:11 PM
Do you really need someone to explain to you how it "works" as you put it? It did what it was set to do. Just because Trump won doesn't mean it didn't work. The biggest populated cities/states do not speak for the rest of the country. Do a little research.

      
m