Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
UK Politics Thread UK Politics Thread

06-21-2017 , 09:56 AM
BBC reporting that the DUP's price for propping up the cons is £2bn

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-norther...itics-40347632.

£2bn just so Disaster May can keep her job for a few months.

Last edited by SootedPowa; 06-21-2017 at 09:58 AM. Reason: it appears the magic money tree has been found
06-21-2017 , 10:19 AM
If she keeps her job for 6 weeks then it's £350 million a week. I think ive seen that figure somehwere before. Some kind of transport vehicle...
06-21-2017 , 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
The decision is reversible.

What do you think would have lengthened the odds that Brexit was a complete **** up? It seems you think had May had a stronger majority and strengthened her position domestically that would translate to her position wrt Brexit negotiations being stronger and I'm not sure why.
I wish it was reversible. I can't see a way out of it though that doesn't involve angering 52% of the population and result in Farage as an MP. Happy for you to paint a picture of a good outcome that I can hope for though.

Because she now has to consider multiple views on the approach to take. It's the same reason why the markets think there is more chance of a soft Brexit and appear to be reacting vaguely positively. There probably is more chance of a soft Brexit, but I also think that going into negotiations without a clear picture of what we want means we're going to get shafted.
06-21-2017 , 10:35 AM
only real difference imo is that there's now a greater chance of the govt crashing down and labour getting in

3 months to go for negotiations to be finalised, lots of stuff agreed, bam jeremy corbyn's mates turns up with different negotiation aims and priorities and you have to pretty much go over everything again. problem

but on balance i think this is better than a big tory landslide and MANDATE FOR HARD BREXIT
06-21-2017 , 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
but on balance i think this is better than a big tory landslide and MANDATE FOR HARD BREXIT
Were they really asking for that though? I always thought the "no deal is better than a bad deal" was an empty threat.

I don't really care what Brexit we get, as long as it's not a **** brexit.
06-21-2017 , 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeccross
I wish it was reversible. I can't see a way out of it though that doesn't involve angering 52% of the population and result in Farage as an MP. Happy for you to paint a picture of a good outcome that I can hope for though.

Because she now has to consider multiple views on the approach to take. It's the same reason why the markets think there is more chance of a soft Brexit and appear to be reacting vaguely positively. There probably is more chance of a soft Brexit, but I also think that going into negotiations without a clear picture of what we want means we're going to get shafted.
There was never clear view on what they wanted from brexit. Her reason for going to the polls was specifically to prevent her having to take account of the various views present within the conservative party, largely because the views of the eurosceptics and europhiles are irreconcilable. Now you can argue that she could have taken a more moderate line but that doesn't seem consistent with the pre election posturing.
06-21-2017 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
Do you think people should be members of a political party?
My gran used to be a member of the Conservative party. She cancelled her membership over some of the **** that Thatcher pulled. There's nothing wrong with being a member of a party as long as you don't take their side unquestioningly.
06-21-2017 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Csaba
My gran used to be a member of the Conservative party. She cancelled her membership over some of the **** that Thatcher pulled. There's nothing wrong with being a member of a party as long as you don't take their side unquestioningly.
I've never suggested taking a side unquestioningly what I would argue that if you consider some version of socialism correct then you are probably better served working for change within the Labour party than you are joining the Tories over the **** that Blair pulled.
06-21-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
There was never clear view on what they wanted from brexit. Her reason for going to the polls was specifically to prevent her having to take account of the various views present within the conservative party, largely because the views of the eurosceptics and europhiles are irreconcilable. Now you can argue that she could have taken a more moderate line but that doesn't seem consistent with the pre election posturing.
She also could have just not ****ed up the non Brexit parts of the campaign entirely.

I am interested if you can paint a picture of how Brexit is reversible that doesn't end in anarchy from the 52%.
06-21-2017 , 12:03 PM
Yep, her main problem apart from the whole Brexit thing being incredibly complicated and no one who campaigned for it having a view what it would look like is that the politicians in favour are largely ****ing terrible, unsurprisingly, and so her negotiating team are dumb as ****.
06-21-2017 , 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dereds
I've never suggested taking a side unquestioningly what I would argue that if you consider some version of socialism correct then you are probably better served working for change within the Labour party than you are joining the Tories over the **** that Blair pulled.
Is the correct answer.
06-21-2017 , 12:54 PM
Great speech for Mr Corbyn

06-21-2017 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeccross
She also could have just not ****ed up the non Brexit parts of the campaign entirely.

I am interested if you can paint a picture of how Brexit is reversible that doesn't end in anarchy from the 52%.
Most of the 52% didn't feel very strongly about it. Exiting the European Union was not a big issue of interest but for a wing of the Conservative party + a few others. Plus the 52% lean old, they're not going to riot. It would get reversed after a second referendum making it to some degree democratic.
06-21-2017 , 02:01 PM
06-21-2017 , 02:17 PM
Christ. And people complained about Diane Abbott's interviews, but at least she had a genuine illness that was affecting her performance.
06-21-2017 , 02:21 PM
lol @ comparing that to abbottgate
06-21-2017 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epcfast
Brilliant.
This isn't just Boris the buffoon, this is reflective of a govt with zero legitimacy to rule. Every significant policy is ditched, as predicted, the only thing left is brexit which is in fact the most controversial on the Tory side.
06-21-2017 , 02:28 PM
Can't wait for RTJ featuring JC at the weekend
06-21-2017 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
lol @ comparing that to abbottgate
Don't know which way you're leaning tbh. Forgetting the detail of a policy <<<<< forgetting everything.
06-21-2017 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
lol @ comparing that to abbottgate
Eh?

It's about ten times worse.
06-21-2017 , 02:47 PM
behave yourselves lads

he doesn't have the answer to the first question, is audibly looking through his notes so he can answer it, finds the relevant bit and then mair goes on a 90 second monologue and doesn't let his guest get two words out
06-21-2017 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
behave yourselves lads

he doesn't have the answer to the first question, is audibly looking through his notes so he can answer it, finds the relevant bit and then mair goes on a 90 second monologue and doesn't let his guest get two words out
You one of Boris's ****? How does he like his crumpet toasted?

This is horribly biased jumping through the hoops perspective on that interview, just wtf????
06-21-2017 , 02:52 PM
06-21-2017 , 02:55 PM
lol BOIDS, unbelievable.
06-21-2017 , 02:57 PM
Ten times worse than Abotts is obvious lolperbole but it is 100% in the same ball park.

Obvious racism is obvious.





bites?

      
m