Quote:
Originally Posted by Adebisi
A big part of the problem here, IMO, is people pretending that terrorists at American airports are a legitimate threat. If Al Qaeda wants to bomb/hijack a plane over the U.S., they're not going to get on in the U.S. where there are a dozen layers of security. They are going to get on in some 3rd world ********, and just wait until they are over the U.S. to do their thing.
Yeah, this is probably a better argument to those who want extra security but get pissed when this guy is getting investigated.
There are ways to provide security without being intrusive and having no actual benefit im sure. Bomb sniffers seems to be one way, i also read about a new comp program that monitors CCTV for psychological behaviour that is a couple years out.
Whilst i disagree with the porno scanners and the Thai massage frisking; investigating people who act suspiciously, such as refusing to go through security measures, seems to be a logical move.