LOL this ****ing trumpkin here

I wouldn't call it Presidential. He's not bending the knee. No one with that kind of training, who is doing what he's doing, is bluffing. We need a hell of a lot more McMuffin types out there, a lot less "all we are saying is give Don a chance." McMuffins come in many variations, fortunately.

Of course [Phil] is the peanut gallery. Dude, your reading comp skills need a whole lot of work. That part where you mistook the tweets for a statements about historic facts, they aren't there. I am deeply troubled by the interpretive skills of our brethren across the pond. Do you even speak American?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ed-naacp-says/

You're still missing the part where Obama says F THE POLICE.

I honestly get your confusion though. There's not a disclaimer before every post saying, "Remember guys, trump ran a platform of blatant white ethnonationalism, with huge white supremacy support."

I like this McMullin fellow. He sounds very naive but his heart seems to be in the right place.

That's exactly why he'll never be POTUS

He had an interview on NPR before the election and even though he was clearly a moderate, in this climate he sounded liberal.

http://www.silive.com/northshore/ind..._incident.html

So obviously there's a non-zero chance of winning, which is best with SOME sort of approach. What is it?

I'm guessing the best, which most of us may not be willing to use, is... "Yeah, eff that Hillary ****, she's a murderous, lying, anti-American corporate shill... Just like Obummer. They're taking our jobs, and they're screwing over all of the regular guys. But, Trump makes me uncomfortable too... He's just a rich guy, and he's said some crazy **** when it comes to race and stuff like that. I mean, can't someone sane just run who's not saying racial stuff?"

So, perhaps some sort of conciliatory tone in which we concede a lot of points, and only argue against Trump's racially charged rhetoric?

"Look, politicians on both sides have been screwing over the average guy for years and it's GOTTA stop. They're stealing our country, I agree... But we've gotta find a sane candidate, not someone involving all this race stuff... Because that's not what we're really about, right? We're about jobs for good Americans of all races, genders, beliefs, etc."

I agree that hitting them on facts doesn't matter, pathos won't work because they don't have enough empathy for others, so maybe it's picking the self-interest that they can share with others. Eventually, after getting some agreement on the jobs for good Americans part at the end, you would delve into how they have a lot more in common with the working class minorities than they realize, and both groups have been getting screwed over by "the man," for years.

It's not the best factual argument, but it mixes some of it in and it may be the most effective for these people.

Actually, it was the lowest classes of Germany that fueled the rise of the National Socialists. Most of the upper and middle classes were Social Democrats, and the academics and the students and the immigrants were communists. The upper class viewed Hitler as a joke, and considered the Nazi's as uneducated boorish thugs. Oh, sure, there were a few prominent Germans who were in to the whole Thule Society stuff, mysticism, Aryan Nordic nonsense, but most of the elitist class of Germans did not support the Nazi's till the late 30's. The lower class workers were the ones who made up the SA Brown Shirts who were leftist National Socialists who thought Germans were being screwed over by internationalism and immigrants.



It was only when Hitler made the other parties illegal and when he realized he needed the support of the Army (who hated the SA) that he had Rohm killed and purged the SA leadership during the Night of the Long Knives.

Once international war looked like a possibility, the loans started flowing on both sides. Lot's of money gets made on international war, and they really could care less what they're even fighting about.

What nonsense is this? Practically noone in the upper and most of the middle classes voted for social democrats in the Weimar Republic.
Workers, while there was some "defection" to the Nazis, were mostly solid voters for them and communists.
http://www.johndclare.net/Weimar6_Geary.htm

Its to much of a tangent to bother with and I am sure you have some sources for thinking the above, but if anyone of reasonable intelligence who has read both our statements spends ~20M on google researching our two statements, they will concur with mine.

lol indio outed himself as a real deal neo-nazi well versed in the tradition in another thread. he should definitely cite sources, lul.

Trump saying there might be something to this global warming thing afterall.

Must have been some interview, he sounds like a neo-con to me. Personable and Likable though I definitely agree with that

What kind of psycho doesn't call the police after shooting someone?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...=NYDailyNewsTw

Always fun when old white guys murder someone for something like being bumped into or because someone was texting during the previews at a theater.

id still like to hear your side of it.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...#storylink=cpy

North Carolina...

Trump to cut NASA "politicized" environmental research to focus exclusively on deep-space exploration...paging Dvaut, looks like we need to reopen THAT discussion.

On a small point all those Indians loving Donald Trump because he's anti Muslim and they're anti Muslim, might want to read up on the scorpion and the frog.


http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/McK...lowFB_DFWBrand

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinney,_Texas

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign...-reagans-party