Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Tragic Death of Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman, Responsible Gun Owner The Tragic Death of Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman, Responsible Gun Owner

03-20-2012 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brons
Felonious Assault in Iowa is a Class D felony (same as third offense OWI and incest fwiw), the lowest you can get. Why would I want the penalty for that to go from 5 years in prison to death?
Because after the fact a court can determine that the perpetrator failed in his attempt to kill you, or that he stopped short of killing you. It is unreasonable to assume that a person being assaulted can just decide "I don't think he's really going to kill me with this gun, knife, beating etc... I'll just let him continue instead of defending myself".
03-20-2012 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Because after the fact a court can determine that the perpetrator failed in his attempt to kill you, or that he stopped short of killing you. It is unreasonable to assume that a person being assaulted can just decide "I don't think he's really going to kill me with this gun, knife, beating etc... I'll just let him continue instead of defending myself".
You quoted the wrong person somehow

Anyways you just have to think that person is about to assault you and fear you'll be injured and it justifies deadly force under the proposed law. Like I told wil or whoever it was the other day I don't really care to argue about this specific law anymore as the Iowa Senate won't pass it so it won't matter anyways. We can argue more generally in the poll thread :P

Last edited by rjoefish; 03-20-2012 at 02:50 PM.
03-20-2012 , 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Lol it's almost 100% he did more than simply walk out of a 7/11. .
Show your work.

I'd even lower it to 90% to make it easier for you.

And please try not acting like you're not blaming the victim when it's so obvious that you are. Hence the quote above.

b
03-20-2012 , 02:52 PM
Thread needs a funnier, more ikes related name.
03-20-2012 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
You quoted the wrong person somehow
sorry I prolly got confused during the merge.

Quote:
Anyways you just have to think that person is about to assault you and fear you'll be injured and it justifies deadly force under the proposed law. Like I told wil or whoever it was the other day I don't really care to argue about this specific law anymore as the Iowa Senate won't pass it so it won't matter anyways. We can argue more generally in the poll thread :P
OK but as I see it you would still have to have a reasonable fear for your life or permanent injury given the new Iowa law you cited or the Fla law we are talking about ITT. And I think that is the part that you are missing. IE someone would have to be threatening you with a weapon or a group of thugs are trying to strong arm you at minimum. In all of these laws you have to prove that the treat was real.

I get what your saying, it is bad if you can just say "yah It was self defense" and the cops say "kewl have a nice day sir" but thats not what is happening in this case or others.
03-20-2012 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Thread needs a funnier, more ikes related name.
The Tragic Blaming of White People
03-20-2012 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
The Tragic Blaming of White People
LOL like a Fly to honey.
03-20-2012 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money2Burn
The article claims he made the statement "They always get away," when he was on the phone with the emergency operator. It was pretty clear he was assuming this random black kid walking through his neighborhood was a criminal based on his own prejudice.
He also went around knocking doors warning the neighbors of criminals and asking if they had seen any black men around
03-20-2012 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
sorry I prolly got confused during the merge.
No wonder this thread is confusing as **** to read. WTF mods?
03-20-2012 , 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
sorry I prolly got confused during the merge.



OK but as I see it you would still have to have a reasonable fear for your life or permanent injury given the new Iowa law you cited or the Fla law we are talking about ITT. And I think that is the part that you are missing. IE someone would have to be threatening you with a weapon or a group of thugs are trying to strong arm you at minimum. In all of these laws you have to prove that the treat was real.

I get what your saying, it is bad if you can just say "yah It was self defense" and the cops say "kewl have a nice day sir" but thats not what is happening in this case or others.
That is pretty much what happened in this case until people made a **** storm out of it though.
03-20-2012 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
That is pretty much what happened in this case until the cops had more time to figure it out meanwhile, people made a **** storm out of it though.
fyp
03-20-2012 , 03:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPVP
No wonder this thread is confusing as **** to read. WTF mods?
they are doing the best they can, give em a break they are drunker than we are.
03-20-2012 , 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
fyp
Are we talking about the same case here? The cops were pretty much defending him in the press and also subtly blaming the victim (I bet he'd of done something different that day!) so I'm at a loss to why you would think that.

ETA:

Quote:
The police department of the city of Sanford has been in the news due to racial tensions before. The police chief in 2011, Brian Tooley, was forced from office after the son of a lieutenant was caught on camera beating up an unsuspecting homeless black man, but whom the department declined to prosecute. After the footage went viral on YouTube, the perpetrator, Justin Collison, was arrested.[27][28][29]The officer in charge of that case was also the one in charge of the Trayvon Martin shooting scene.

Last edited by rjoefish; 03-20-2012 at 03:21 PM.
03-20-2012 , 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Are we talking about the same case here? The cops were pretty much defending him in the press
Saying that the shooter claimed selfdefense and that they are investigating != defending.

Quote:
and also subtly blaming the victim (I bet he'd of done something different that day!) so I'm at a loss to why you would think that.
Well I think it is a poor choice of words and not something I would put out in press statement like that but... Calling your girlfriend instead of the cops and thinking "ima put my hoodie on and duck between these houses" is a pretty terrible decision. If he thought the guy was stalking him the best thing to do would be stay out in the lighted street and call the cops. So yes I think that in hindsight he would have done something different.
03-20-2012 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I'm on a bus, but he got shot after the fight, not after running.
LOL.
03-20-2012 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
they are doing the best they can, give em a break they are drunker than we are.
Meh, don't really see the point of merging threads. Lock the latest one, tell us to continue in the relevant thread and be done with it imo.
03-20-2012 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Saying that the shooter claimed selfdefense and that they are investigating != defending.



Well I think it is a poor choice of words and not something I would put out in press statement like that but... Calling your girlfriend instead of the cops and thinking "ima put my hoodie on and duck between these houses" is a pretty terrible decision. If he thought the guy was stalking him the best thing to do would be stay out in the lighted street and call the cops. So yes I think that in hindsight he would have done something different.
That's good blame the victim mentality. The guy was being stalked by a crazy person. He did the best he could to try and avoid a gun toting crazy person.
03-20-2012 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCPVP
Meh, don't really see the point of merging threads. Lock the latest one, tell us to continue in the relevant thread and be done with it imo.
It was all in the monthly NC thread...
03-20-2012 , 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case Closed
That's good blame the victim mentality. The guy was being stalked by a crazy person. He did the best he could to try and avoid a gun toting crazy person.
No I was just pointing out the numerous mistakes he made, and there are more. The best way to not become a victim is to not set yourself up to become one. Not trying to be a jerk just pointing out decisions that he made were not the wisest.
03-20-2012 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
No I was just pointing out the numerous mistakes he made, and there are more. The best way to not become a victim is to not set yourself up to become one. Not trying to be a jerk just pointing out decisions that he made were not the wisest.
He made ZERO mistakes. I can make the inference from your posting history as to why you feel this way. It's not that complicated to figure out why you blame this guy and back the openly racist and corrupt cops. I'm not an idiot NeBlis.
03-20-2012 , 03:45 PM
His mistake was walking outside while being black.
03-20-2012 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Case Closed
He made ZERO mistakes. I can make the inference from your posting history as to why you feel this way. It's not that complicated to figure out why you blame this guy and back the openly racist and corrupt cops. I'm not an idiot NeBlis.
WAT? im just pointing oout something I was thinking about. I was thinking of what I would have done if I was this him. What do you think I'm saying? I don't think that Zimmerman did much of anything other than be outside that was justifiable give the evidence. That doesn't meen that I cant look at the other things that happened and critique them as well. At the end of the day the fault for this falls squarely at Zimmerman's feet, that doesn't mean others didn't make mistakes.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Brons
His mistake was walking outside while being black.

GMAFB thats not even close to what I'm saying.
03-20-2012 , 03:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
WAT? im just pointing oout something I was thinking about. I was thinking of what I would have done if I was this him. What do you think I'm saying? I don't think that Zimmerman did much of anything other than be outside that was justifiable give the evidence. That doesn't meen that I cant look at the other things that happened and critique them as well. At the end of the day the fault for this falls squarely at Zimmerman's feet, that doesn't mean others didn't make mistakes.


GMAFB thats not even close to what I'm saying.
Neblis, I was not born yesterday. You were making excuses for opening racist cops and blaming a guy murder victim for trying to get away from his murderer. You've done this before and I have a strange feeling you'll do it again.
03-20-2012 , 03:59 PM
Case Closed... reading your post again I guess you are trying to pull some Fly style accusation of me as a racist? Is that what your getting at? Seriously? If so FU if not plz explain what you ment.
03-20-2012 , 04:02 PM
What is with certain people and their inescapable need to constantly blame the victim? Poor people are lazy, worthless, leeches on society. Employers should have every freedom in the world, because after all they are the OWNERS, and they should have every leverage over their employees. And now, unarmed people who are gunned down in the street, well they should have known better, clearly.

      
m