Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Tragic Death of the Democratic Party The Tragic Death of the Democratic Party

11-12-2016 , 06:47 PM
The Constitution was amended due to those issues.
11-12-2016 , 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Compromise

Do you not understand American history?

Anyway, the electoral college is never going away because it takes 38 states to amend the Constitution and the little states out West and the competitive Electoral states (midwest, Florida, NC, VA, et al) are never signing on.

You whining about this the the equivalent of whining why the sky is blue and wanting to change it.

It will just literally always be this way.
On second thought California should split into 60 different states so a person living here has the same voice as someone in Wyoming.
11-12-2016 , 06:47 PM
I do think it's fair to think about tyranny of the majority before shelving the current system.
11-12-2016 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Of all the sad, pathetic, obviously bull**** arguments I've seen you Trumpers make over the past 18 months, defending the Electoral College has got to be among the worst.
My main aggravation is libtards projecting the current popular vote onto the current election. If the winner was decided that way the entire election would be different, specifically due to turnout. A liberal in Kansas may not vote because they know their vote doesn't matter. A conservative in California may not vote because they know their vote doesn't matter.

My second aggravation is the waste of electronic text on the matter. It will take a constitutional amendment to end the electoral college. And that will never happen because their are not 38 states that want it to end.
11-12-2016 , 06:53 PM
Yeah well good thing I never said any of that. My point was that Dems are and remain a competitive party, thus making the thread title dumb and not true.
11-12-2016 , 06:57 PM
It's also important to remember that Trump was elected to install exactly the kind of system the Electoral College represents. It's purpose now is to take power away from black voters and give more power to white voters in swing states. Those 1 to 2 million voters who won the popular vote for Clinton matter, and we're going to continue reminding people of these voters for Trump's entire Presidency. It speaks to the general nature of our times--the argument over whether Black Lives Matter, whether pussy grabbing matters, well now we are going to argue over whether All Votes Matter. And the conversation isn't going away, I can promise you that. It's only beginning.
11-12-2016 , 06:59 PM
Also it speaks to the fact that Trump and the Republicans do not have the mandate they claim to have. Another reason it will continually be pointed out for the next four years.
11-12-2016 , 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Yeah well good thing I never said any of that. My point was that Dems are and remain a competitive party, thus making the thread title dumb and not true.
I know you what you meant by your post.

You posted raw vote numbers like it mattered for the Presidency.

You posted a completely asinine raw vote total for Senate, when you obviously know that in California there were 2 Democratic candidates running.

The numbers literally mean nothing.
11-12-2016 , 07:00 PM
Awval, are you proud of your two votes for Obama?
11-12-2016 , 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Is that sarcastic? Because the current system very clearly ****s Californians. Explain why a person living in Wyoming should have 60 times as much influence on a major body of the federal government than a person who lives in California.
Compromise requires that you give up something.

Folks in CA agreed to give up some political power to folks in WY when they joined the union.

I suppose further compromise would be necessary to get folks in WY to give up that political power.

So what would you give up in exchange for the removal of the Electoral College?
11-12-2016 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
I know you what you meant by your post.

You posted raw vote numbers like it mattered for the Presidency.

You posted a completely asinine raw vote total for Senate, when you obviously know that in California there were 2 Democratic candidates running.

The numbers literally mean nothing.
You obviously don't understand what I meant, that's why I explained it. The posts are just a few posts up, you can go back and read them again if you still don't get it.
11-12-2016 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Also it speaks to the fact that Trump and the Republicans do not have the mandate they claim to have. Another reason it will continually be pointed out for the next four years.
Let me check.

Trump/Republicans

[ x ] Presidency

[ x ] House

[ x ] Senate

11-12-2016 , 07:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
Awval, are you proud of your two votes for Obama?
Yes.
11-12-2016 , 07:05 PM
Another very good reason to keep bringing up the fact that Hillary won the popular vote by over a million votes: people keep saying Hillary "failed to connect with voters." She absolutely connected with voters. In fact, she connected with 1 to 2 million more voters than Donald Trump did.
11-12-2016 , 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
It's also important to remember that Trump was elected to install exactly the kind of system the Electoral College represents. It's purpose now is to take power away from black voters and give more power to white voters in swing states. Those 1 to 2 million voters who won the popular vote for Clinton matter, and we're going to continue reminding people of these voters for Trump's entire Presidency. It speaks to the general nature of our times--the argument over whether Black Lives Matter, whether pussy grabbing matters, well now we are going to argue over whether All Votes Matter. And the conversation isn't going away, I can promise you that. It's only beginning.
Let's check and see if your protests have done anything?

Spoiler:
Nope, Trump still President-Elect
11-12-2016 , 07:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Let me check.

Trump/Republicans

[ x ] Presidency

[ x ] House

[ x ] Senate

[ x ] Supreme Court

[ x ] Majority of Governorships and State Legislatures

fyp
11-12-2016 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
This poster is a lock to throw his chips across the table at the guy who gives him a bad beat.
You're the type to donk off all your chips on 27. What's your point?
11-12-2016 , 07:14 PM
I can handle Trump as POTUS.

I'll deal with the awful fact that the Republicans control the house and senate and stole a Supreme Court nomination that was rightfully Obama's pick.

But this emboldening of Shuffle is too much. Somebody please make it stop.
11-12-2016 , 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
I do think it's fair to think about tyranny of the majority before shelving the current system.
Maybe a house of legislature where every minority group gets equal representation?

I'm good. Jews need "equal" representation the same as people who live in Alaska.

But seriously then, why not 60 states in California?

What is a minority based on geography?

A farmer in California has more in common with a farmer in Iowa and a computer programmer in SF has more in common with a programmer in Raliegh.

Last edited by microbet; 11-12-2016 at 07:21 PM.
11-12-2016 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
I can handle Trump as POTUS.

I'll deal with the awful fact that the Republicans control the house and senate and stole a Supreme Court nomination that was rightfully Obama's pick.

But this emboldening of Shuffle is too much. Somebody please make it stop.
Our political discourse has gotten worse and worse over the last ten years, but it feels like after Tuesday it's like completely dead. These aren't conversations, it's like me and these other guys aren't even speaking the same language. It's just some weird tribal back and forth screaming. I'm embarrassed to be a part of it.
11-12-2016 , 07:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
I'd argue the exact opposite. Instead of doing what they really wanted when they had the numbers to jam it through, they wussed out and basically took the Republican health reform ideas from 20 years ago and went with that.

If they got single payer or a public option through, they probably have a much more popular program right now... and one that would be MUCH tougher to repeal.
It was worth noting during the democratic primary that the Bern coalition was basically completely unimpressed and (often downright hostile) with anything legislatively that Obama administration did. So Ds try to pass a moderate healthcare reform in the ACA and are brutally battered from the left and the right for doing so for years to come. This kind of outcome isn't sustainable. Also, i think Yglesias' take that Obama's administration really blew it by not having any high profile banker prosecutions, from the public perspective all the rich wallstreet elite got off easy for their role in the great recession, when during the saving and loan crisis and aftermath 100's of execs were prosecuted and went to jail. The public doesn't understand the nuances of dodd-frank and other financial reforms, but they do notice major prosecutions or the lack thereof. Dodd-Frank is also another good example of a moderate win that was savaged as a corrupt failure by both the bern coalition and republicans. Same goes for Obama's foreign policy or his attempt at passing TPP.
11-12-2016 , 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Yes.


Biden vs. Trump: Who you voting for?
11-12-2016 , 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapidator
Compromise requires that you give up something.

Folks in CA agreed to give up some political power to folks in WY when they joined the union.

I suppose further compromise would be necessary to get folks in WY to give up that political power.

So what would you give up in exchange for the removal of the Electoral College?
How about we get the idea of boycotting Wyoming and not shipping any food or imported goods or all the stuff they need to live there and then we give that up in exchange for equal representation?
11-12-2016 , 07:36 PM
I'm having a hard time deciding what is most delicious...

First up... NYT promises to return to the honest reporting of the news.

New York Times: We blew it on Trump

Quote:
But bad or sloppy journalism doesn’t fully capture the Times sins. Not after it announced that it was breaking it rules of coverage because Trump didn’t deserve fairness.

As media columnist Jim Rutenberg put it in August, most Times reporters saw Trump “as an abnormal and potentially dangerous candidate” and thus couldn’t be even-handed.

That wasn’t one reporter talking — it was policy. The standards, developed over decades to force reporters and editors to be fair and to build public trust, were effectively eliminated as too restrictive for the Trump phenomenon.
Then there is... you know things are bad when the DNC looks to the Tea Party for an example to follow.

Seething liberals vow revolution in Democratic Party

Quote:
“We have to install the playbook of the Tea Party,” said Ohio state lawmaker Nina Turner, a Sanders surrogate.”
Perhaps this... political discrimination, Ivy League "cry-ins", and cancelled exams... "best and brightest" tho.

Scenes from the liberal meltdown

Quote:
... Meanwhile, the CEO of Grubhub, the online food-delivery service, demanded that employees who agree with Trump resign, because “you have no place here.” (He had to retreat: His lawyers read him the First Amendment and noted that political discrimination also violates California law.)

...
 The University of Michigan offered its traumatized students coloring books and Play-Doh to calm them. (Are its students in college or kindergarten?)

 The University of Kansas reminded its stressed-out kids that therapy dogs, a regular campus feature, were available.

 Cornell University, an Ivy League school, held a campus-wide “cry-in,” with officials handing out tissues and hot chocolate.

 Tufts University offered its devastated students arts and crafts sessions. (OK, not kindergarten — more like summer camp.)

 At campuses from elite Yale to Connecticut to Iowa and beyond, professors canceled classes and/or exams — either because students asked or because instructors were too distraught to teach.
I don't think this is the demise of the Democrat Party. Seems like the cognitive dissonance will continue to assert itself.
11-12-2016 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
How about we get the idea of boycotting Wyoming and not shipping any food or imported goods or all the stuff they need to live there and then we give that up in exchange for equal representation?
I can plow a field all day long
I can catch catfish from dusk till dawn
We make our own whiskey and our own smoke too
Ain’t too many things these ole boys can’t do
We grow good ole tomatoes and homemade wine
And a country boy can survive
Country folks can survive


      
m