Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sarah Palin, BruceZ, and Mean People on the Internet Sarah Palin, BruceZ, and Mean People on the Internet

07-08-2017 , 03:17 PM
Clovis man, you're putting on a clinic for how not to respond to criticism. Just drop it and everybody will have moved on to something else by the end of the day.
07-08-2017 , 03:24 PM
wow i haven't seen a meltdown like this since trump's only solo presidential press conference
07-08-2017 , 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Clovis man, you're putting on a clinic for how not to respond to criticism. Just drop it and everybody will have moved on to something else by the end of the day.
Just say penis or dick more. Works for me. I really enjoyed the Clovis farewell to the troops scene from Glen Gary Glen Ross. Good stuff.
07-08-2017 , 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Poor old Fly. I find him interesting and engaging, but then I haven't incurred his wrath yet.
fly is elite and hands down the funniest descriptive writer in this forum
07-08-2017 , 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
I'll leave it to you which observations to make from here. Yet again when you get there, consider that you compared humor where in racist frogs target blacks as the object of the joke whereas Fly targets chez and you really just tried to draw a moral equivalency. Which I think is sort of what I was saying about white privilege. You figured out the "cruelness is every where on the internet" then threw up your hands to figure out how to separate the targets of Breitbart and Fly's targets.
You are taking a lot of liberties in filling in the blanks in my thought process.

I never said that there was a "moral equivalency" between Fly and "racist frogs who target blacks."

I never "threw up my hands" and said that it is impossible to distinguish between Breitbart's targets and Fly's targets.

I guess my point was that "have thicker skin" and "get a sense of humor" are not all-purpose justifications for incivility, as Ann Coulter has proven for the better part of two decades.

Fly serves a purpose. He has a keen sense of smell for racism. No one on this forum is better at sniffing it out. And he is funny. On the other hand, it seems a little overbroad to say that anyone who takes Fly's attacks personally has a terminal case of white privilege. Fly often is deliberately insulting and abrasive. He often seems to draw no distinction between people who are awful and people who are well-intentioned but wrong. And sometimes his attacks are simply misdirected.
07-08-2017 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Clovis man, you're putting on a clinic for how not to respond to criticism. Just drop it and everybody will have moved on to something else by the end of the day.
Definitely this. Fly is Fly. He is the Michael Moore of this forum. The best approach is to enjoy the parts of him that you enjoy and ignore the parts you don't.
07-08-2017 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
-super long winded whining-
bro, you jumped to the defense of sarah palin, a revolting human being who has been trying her hardest to cozy up to alt-right and other white nationalists for years...and then you trotted out and subsequently doubled down on this silly idea that the tea party was a "small economic govt movement", not about racism, and then you likened those who disagreed with you to pizzagaters and r/donald posters

if you want people to defend you, try posting better.
07-08-2017 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
Clovis was inexplicably starting with the assumption that Palin wasn't a racist, err sorry, wasn't a full blown white supremacist that rocks KKK gear. That don't make no sense. She's obviously on the side of racists, and by extension is obviously one herself.
and more than that, she's not just some inconsequential, ordinary dip**** racist hick from boonie**** alaska, shes a goddamn former elected official and VP candidate who played a direct role in advancing policies of white supremacy on the local and national stage. she's a fixture at republican functions and, regrettably, is a person who thousands of people look to for political guidance. yet somehow she's not as "white supremacist" as cletus the klan member in alabama? gtfo here with that nonsense imo
07-08-2017 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
I have unfortunately noticed a significant change in this sub-forum over the past year. More an more it is simply a echo chamber where everyone tries to out scream each other and claim the label of most extreme poster. Myself included.
I noticed this too.
07-08-2017 , 04:05 PM
Tweet is still up.
She shares young con stuff regularly.
Young con posts stuff like:

07-08-2017 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
I generally agree that people should have thick skin if they are going to discuss politics on the internet. I'm not sure why Clovis cares what Fly thinks of him. Just put him on ignore if he pisses you off.

That said, I would note that "have thicker skin" and "get a sense of humor" is the inevitable response of the literate alt-right whenever anyone claims to be offended by their antics. I'm not sure what to make of that observation.
wat? so you're confused because in your mind, "normies" calling racists racist is just as bad as when racists post pepe memes with jews and ovens?
07-08-2017 , 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
I noticed this too.
right, people aren't just pissed off AF at the current state of affairs, no, they really care about being labelled "most extreme poker politics forum poster"

get a grip
07-08-2017 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
You are taking a lot of liberties in filling in the blanks in my thought process.

I never said that there was a "moral equivalency" between Fly and "racist frogs who target blacks."

I never "threw up my hands" and said that it is impossible to distinguish between Breitbart's targets and Fly's targets.

I guess my point was that "have thicker skin" and "get a sense of humor" are not all-purpose justifications for incivility, as Ann Coulter has proven for the better part of two decades.

Fly serves a purpose. He has a keen sense of smell for racism. No one on this forum is better at sniffing it out. And he is funny. On the other hand, it seems a little overbroad to say that anyone who takes Fly's attacks personally has a terminal case of white privilege. Fly often is deliberately insulting and abrasive. He often seems to draw no distinction between people who are awful and people who are well-intentioned but wrong. And sometimes his attacks are simply misdirected.
But I wasn't justifying incivility for the sake of it, simply that the response to Fly is over the top given that Fly's rhetoric isn't that bad and the people that are targeted aren't being unduly victimized by anything that bad.

Yet again-- the comparison to Ann Coulter? The **** yo?

Ann Coulter:

Quote:
“We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
Quote:
She stood by those comments three years later, and has since suggested Islam is a “car-burning cult” with a “predilection for violence.”
Quote:
In 2012, she called President Obama a “******” – and after she was criticised by people with disabilities for the use of the term, she replied: “Oh, screw them.”
On 9/11 widows:

Quote:
"I've never seen people enjoy their husbands' deaths so much," she writes in the book.
Yet AGAIN I am struck by all the counter examples Fly that I'm told Fly is just like are in fact notable for saying really atrocious things to say about literally billions of people and Fly's great sin is offending a few white guys on the internet and I'm told all of this is really similar and I should see the point.

But we're on YOUR SECOND ATTEMPT NOW and all I've taken away is actually yeah, there's a whole lot of asinine analogies made here that speak to a drastic lack of understanding about context likely borne out of tremendous amounts of privilege and lack of basic human decency to be able to separate Fly from Ann Coulter.

I know, I know, you didn't mean that Fly was just like Ann Coulter, you didn't mean Fly was just like the alt-right, but all of your analogies seem to be simply begging me to assume white guys on the internet facing down Fly are l like 9/11 widows and Muslims and the mentally disabled vis a vis Ann Coulter.

Like, yo, Rococo, you seem OK on the whole but...my spidey sense is tingling here.
07-08-2017 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
wat? so you're confused because in your mind, "normies" calling racists racist is just as bad as when racists post pepe memes with jews and ovens?
JFC. I must suck at writing. As I just explained in response to DVaut, that was not my point at all.
07-08-2017 , 04:22 PM
I don't think your writing is the problem.
07-08-2017 , 04:25 PM
"Man Fly is really uncivil to white guys on the internet! Just like this person who has a decades long career in media insulting Muslims, Jews, Mexicans, women, the mentally disable and terrorist victims' widows."

"Uh, woah, wtf?"

"Sorry, I'm really bad at written communication."
07-08-2017 , 04:30 PM
It's uncomfortable to argue from the right when Fly is around, which I've done before. That's not a value judgment, outrage is appropriate when Trump is the President.
07-08-2017 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
I don't think your writing is the problem.
Yeah, the Ann Coulter post was pretty clear and seems to have gone totally over your head.
07-08-2017 , 04:32 PM
It's worth noting that a lot of forums, including this one when I was in charge, handled insults differently based on whether the target is a poster.
07-08-2017 , 04:35 PM
the whole thing is ludicrous anyway because, rightly or not, 95% of clovis' posts in this forum are dedicated not only to bashing donald trump and trumpkins, but americans as a whole. i'm not stepping up in defense of usa#1 here, but i think it's pretty ridiculous that he's sitting here tone policing, drawing up ludicrous false equivalencies, and acting so offended at being talked down to, as if he's above all the incivility when he's so clearly not.

this all boils down to having thicker skin and not doubling down on a bunch of easily refuted hawt takes about how economic-minded the tea party is/was
07-08-2017 , 04:36 PM
lol at this charade
07-08-2017 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Like, yo, Rococo, you seem OK on the whole but...my spidey sense is tingling here.
Oh well. I don't know why your spidey sense is tingling, but there isn't much I can do about it.

To be clear, I'm not equating Fly to racists. I just think of him as a polemicist whose main audience is those who already agree with him. But when someone is trying to defend a billboard that shows Obama bowing to a Saudi as "not racist", yeah, Fly is the best in the business at exposing them.

Perhaps I am overreacting to the "get a sense of humor" argument. I have a negative reaction generally to that response because the right has used it so frequently as a defense to charges of racism.
07-08-2017 , 04:39 PM
i dont think "get a sense of humor" was ever part of dvaut's argument/thesis
07-08-2017 , 04:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
Oh well. I don't know why your spidey sense is tingling, but there isn't much I can do about it.

To be clear, I'm not equating Fly to racists. I just think of him as a polemicist whose main audience is those who already agree with him. But when someone is trying to defend a billboard that shows Obama bowing to a Saudi as "not racist", yeah, Fly is the best in the business at exposing them.

Perhaps I am overreacting to the "get a sense of humor" argument. I have a negative reaction generally to that response because the right has used it so frequently as a defense to charges of racism.
OK, but are those of us on the left allowed to be thin skinned when people white night obvious Neo-Nazi dogwhistles and insist Sarah ****ing Palin always be given the benefit of the doubt? Cuz, that **** is sort of offensive, yo.
07-08-2017 , 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +rep_lol
i dont think "get a sense of humor" was ever part of dvaut's argument/thesis
OK. If DVaut wasn't the one who made the get a thicker skin and get a sense of humor post, then I misread and there is no point in me directing comments at him.

I have to go to a wedding. Have fun everyone.

      
m