http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/08/justic...gun/index.html

I like when a thread title has more substance than the post.

It's miles better than his last thread.

eta: Oh, that's because he didn't try writing the headline himself this time.

This thread is terrible.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/08/justic...gun/index.html



Quote:
July 9, 2012

A woman who witnessed the 1968 assassination of Robert F. Kennedy says she has agreed to testify for Sirhan Sirhan's new defense team.

Nina Rhodes-Hughes insists Sirhan was not the only gunman firing shots when Sen. Kennedy was murdered only a few feet away from her at a Los Angeles hotel. She says there were two guns firing from separate positions and that authorities altered her account of the crime.

"What has to come out is that there was another shooter to my right," Rhodes-Hughes has told CNN. "The truth has got to be told. No more cover-ups."
(continued)

WHAT IS HAPPENING?

He saved his thread. And at least his conspiracy theory is, minimally, willing to be run by CNN. I mean, I'm pretty hard on the conspiritards, but most of them can't even meet this minimum standard. This? This'll do, pig. This'll do.

Was Batman involved?

I think there were outside forces at work. OP's gotta be working with someone for this thread to be reopened like this.

Like Batman?

Think this describes my feelings on OP:

free Dale Gribble