Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
you drew that analogy, not me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
Wrong. go back and re-read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
It is relevant to all people. The color of your skin is not a factor.
It depends.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
No, it was not. If he would have said "the amount of money given to people in the form of entitlements could not be considered enough to cause harm" would have been a specific statement. Laughing that the idea of giving money to people could possibly cause harm is a blanket statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
My point was that it was an absurd statement. Of course giving people free stuff can harm people. That's not to say that giving people money/stuff will always cause harm, but that blanket statements like his shouldn't be left to stand. Reductio ad absurdum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibninjas
So you are admitting your statement was absurd?
So Jibs, ever going to spit out a point or speak to the actual topic at hand or explain why spoiling children was a relevant analogy? Or just more JAQng off?
Thesis: Giving poor people money does more help than hurt. Giving black people reparations for their ancestors stolen labor would do black people more harm than hurt.
Now you either agree or disagree and give reasons why or why not, in the form of a statement.