lolololol you guys a the nutlow worst

Forgetting the fact many people with Native American ancestry don't appear on the Dawes rolls, and many who have no Native American ancestry do, neither you nor ikes has provided a single shred of evidence to support your claim that WERN LIED BOUT BEIN INJUN!

that's the chicken you two were trying to keep ****ing, as it was so eloquently put earlier

Every one of his presidential electoral victories was certified as free and fair by international observers. Do your own research bub.

From the Atlantic article I posted earlier. Harvard and some law school directory listed her as Native American. She must have claimed this at some point or another for them to have done so. Jeez you people are dense.

Well... they weren't. I'll be happy to debate you on this in another thread. We even have one on Venezuela and Chavez already.

And maybe it is unfair that you have to have a direct ancestor on the Dawes rolls to claim to be Indian but the tribes themselves hold this standard, not angry jimmy rustling white conservatives. Don't take it up with me, take that up with them. She could also take a blood test to prove the naysayers wrong.

Id still love to hear why Warren is so radical and dangerous.

Yeah it's so weird how libertarians/conservatives tend to signal sympathy towards Orwell. He would've HATED you, Row, and if you were actually aware of his body of work you'd hate him right back.

I will explain how she is radical tomorrow. But by dangerous, I meant politically speaking. Not like dangerous to the American people. Poor choice of words on my part.

LOL good luck, kid. Like I said, we're all just quaking in our boots over here. He's just super super smart and really loves America, Jesus, and the Constitution. Plus there's that one Dershowitz quote. I mean, ****, it's OVER.

Seriously, that's exactly what I'm talking about. You get one guy whose insane Dad made him go to Harvard and who rode the wingnut welfare train from there to the Senate and I think in your mind that IS an intellectual.

Here's the thing, though. I'm pretty sure Elizabeth Warren is capable of following Dr. Seuss books, "embellished resume" and all! Not so for ye old Canadian anchor baby.

I've read both 1984 and Animal farm Fly. I've also heard an an entire 1 hour EconTalk podcast on his biography. I doubt he would "hate me" lol and just because he was a lefty doesn't discount the use of libertarians quoting his works to highlight governments acting in a totalitarian manner lol. You don't get exclusive rights to quote someone due to their ideology lol.

Or, you know, you could not call her a liar.

Cruz graduated at the top of his law class at Harvard. The best college debater of his day. He was editor for the Harvard law review, an adjunct law professor for University of Texas, law clerk for a Chief Justice of SCOTUS, argued cases and won at SCOTUS.

He's brilliant and by any qualification an "intellectual".

When someone makes a claim the burden is on them to support said claim. She hasn't. And it's not just me that's taken issue with her it was Native American groups within the Democratic Party that did so along with the Brown campaign. On college applications, she said she was white when having the opportunity to claim to be Native American. Then later in life, she claimed to be NA. At some point she knowingly lied.

Going to sleep now before you guys shift the goalposts.

When Obama, a right leaning centrist, is a "radical socialist" all that is to the left is communism.

Which just shows how ****ed up America's political spectrum is.

That Americans can't identify a right leaning centrist doesn't invalidate where she sits on the spectrum.

Being the smartest guy on the short bus isn't a threat. Cruz can never out debate his own words and he will get crushed if he were to win the nomination because his moral bankruptcy can only take him so far.

Somewhere there is a Hillary employee putting together dossiers of the potential winners and his easiest day of oppo research was Cruz.

If Hillary were in Germany or the the UK she definitely would be in their conservative parties.

The US has an extremely narrow "acceptable" political spectrum. And that spectrum is shifted much further to the right than in most developed countries. When looking at politics from a global perspective she is very much center/center-right.

The bold part is the part where you make an assertion not based on fact. DUCY?

Okay... at some point she thought she had lied. Happy?

She's not a right leaning centrist, we're not in the UK or Germany. We're in the United States, and here, she is a leading member or the Democratic party. The progressive leftist party. That is where she stands. You are so self centered and so self righteous, you think the world evolves around what your country or continent's political spectrum is.

Like why should we give a damn where her current policies would put her in Germany or the UK? Sure it's an interesting case model of how the political spectrum changes from country to country, but that's about it.

Also, I doubt she would be conservative in the UK or Germany. She would probably place herself on the same spot in the spectrum relatively. So in Germany or in the UK she would probably just be that much more leftist.

See, you're doing that whole thing where you make **** up again. Oh, but that chicken is clucking in your ear so gently...

lol, do I have to quote the Atlantic article for you also? For student applications to Rutgers and other colleges, she put her race down as white. Then when she was hired as a professor for Harvard and other colleges, she was Native American. At some point she must have thought she lied. I'm not making this out to be a big deal, but let's not deny reality. I'm not just making **** up. She actually did this.

*yawn*

You've got no evidence that she isn't part NA, no evidence that she didn't think she was part NA, and no evidence that the supposed lie helped her in any way.

A complete lack of evidence that she is part NA isn't evidence that she isn't part NA!

Brilliant! Again, I'll remember that one.

She didn't start listing herself as NA for over a decade of her career and never claimed to be NA in any undergrad or law school applications. Oh well for no evidence that she didn't think she was part NA.