Man I love this game. Forum liberals love ripping Paul's plagiarism, stupidly defends and/or downplays Warren lying about her heritage throughout her academic career.

Wonderful.

Sorry for the typo....misspelled "full ikes".

The new birthers.

Inb4 Trump gets involved.

b

Lol, she obviously did knowingly lie. She's using the Ron Paul newsletter defense, and you guys are partisan enough to actually believe it.

Or what I actually said....its a big deal if she knowingly lied (enough to lose a job or not be potus) but its stupid to think that she got a job at harvard because of that lie.

Yes and I haven't actually said she got the job simply because she claimed to be Native American. She did lie, and you're calling me a full ****** for saying that. Get your **** together.

Nobody knows whether or not she actually is part Native American and it might be impossible to know, she might have heard it by word of mouth passed down from her grandparents or something, she might have read it in family documents, she might have made it up. We don't know, it doesn't matter, nobody cares.

The last 6 posts before your ridiculous comparison to paulbots was how "we don't know!!!!!" how much her 1/16 Cherokee claim helped (that hasn't been confirmed to be known by the faculty at that time, and hasn't been confirmed to be false or confirmed to be an intentional lie on her part) in her week long grueling Harvard faculty interviews. Hence the full ikes, which granted, is more of a lifetime achievement award anyway.

So you're basically make up things I said? Awesome. You should agree with me based on your statement if she lied its a big deal. That fake princeton education is failing you.

Yes, if she lied its a big deal for political aspirations and any employer can fire her if they want to (or decide its not a big enough deal and do nothing). You are the only one certain that she did purposefully lie and are broadly painting my stance, amongst others, as paulbotish.

http://www.skwirk.com/p-c_s-56_u-427...ion/background

Why does Elizabeth Warren and the far left's thinking seem so similar to Karl Marx?

That's because it is. Warren claimed to be Native American for years, and was put in a report claiming she was a woman of color. It takes a special kind of naïveté to believe she was uninvolved in those actions.

I'm not sure which is worse, that you asked such a ridiculous question or that you linked to a grammar school homework site to illustrate it.

Clearly W was more qualified.

b

Not sure what it is in this sentence....but again, we don't know if she has some grandparent with part Cherokee heritage or was at least incorrectly told that as a child and later on. Either of which largely exonerate her in my opinion. The claims of being a "women of color" seem to come from University press releases, which are notoriously terrible and written with almost 0 influence from faculty. I've shown nonsensical press releases about papers I worked on with full professor co authors that they just shrugged off with "yeah, lol standard press release". Its complete ignorance to think that she had to have been involved in those actions.

Desperation?

b

We have plenty of information about warrens grandparents. Being told as a child doesn't excuse making the claim as an adult midway through your career without confirming the information. She was included in the press release because she claimed to be Native American, not because the school made it up. Ron Paul newsletter denial level naïveté itt confirmed.

You'd have a better comparison if she came from University of Warren. Then you could claim she should've known about the public relations within the university.

b

Ikes level Ikes itt. We've gone from LYING.....to well maybe she is guilty of "not confirming largely irrelevant parental lineage on a resume". By your rate of learning maybe in 10 more posts we can get you to admit that maybe she does have some random Cherokee lineage and you will be caught up to literally everybody else itt from moment 1. Awful, awful stuff man.

WTF???

Sooooooo.... being an 'expert' on bankruptcy makes one qualified to be President?

And I just love her 'groundbreaking research'.... she (with the help of 2 colleagues) divined often bankruptcy is caused by, wait a minute..... not just yet.... ****ing unemployment!!!! Or serious medical problems!!!!

Whodathunkit. Only on the far left is the notion unemployment can cause bankruptcy breaking news if you aren't a trust fund baby. That kind of out of the box thinking is certainly the stuff of Presidential timber!

You fellas are awfully funny defending a member of your tribe.

You don't have to keep confirming the newsletter level denial.... it's already done.

To be fair, if she made it up, that is kind of important.

It's not at all likely that's what happened, though.

lol ikes walk it back

LOL minus the 9 other parts of her resume listed. (many(including conservs who blame those bankrupt on their own choices) thought the cause for bankruptcy was in overspending on luxury items--in fact, that was what Warren thought it would show.)

Even so, the comparison was with W. Whose only major accomplishment was being born to the right parents. Minus that, he doesn't come anywhere near political office.

But you guys keep acting like it's the same as Lance Armstrong failing a drug test.

b

Man, if this fauxcahontas thing is the best dirt on Warren, maybe she's got a legit shot at the White House.

Hahah, right. The side saying that she could have lied, could have been misled by relatives or could be telling a truth that was twisted terribly in an artcile written by somebody else is the same as the "ron paul did nothing wrong ever and certainly not wrt to the racist newsletters written in his own name that he admits to lying about, giving the excuse of "well, it was in the middle of a campaign!" while he was in the middle of another campaign" crowd. Like I said awful, awful derp and getting into bad even for you territory.