Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Other Topics > Politics

Notices

Politics political discourse

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2012, 12:20 PM   #91
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Ashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Polishing crystal football brb
Posts: 12,368
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

I'm getting ready to head out to nourishment lunch, bbl
Ashington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:23 PM   #92
Politics Court Jester
 
Ineedaride2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Warning: This post contains sarcasm
Posts: 16,539
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Don't let the door portal plank hit you on your posterior ass on your way out.
Ineedaride2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:51 PM   #93
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UTG-3
Posts: 3,093
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils View Post
1. I just find it very insulting to think that my property (income) is somehow the govs. And that tax cuts are a zero sum game. 2. How many times in our history does it need to be pointed out that when you reduce taxes you actually increase revenue to the gov?
1. It's disgusting how you conservative punks think you are entitled to what you work for.

2. What's next are you going to claim that 1/6th of an XL pizza could be larger than a 1/4 of a personal pan pizza. RIDICULOUS!
bahbahmickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:00 PM   #94
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,516
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils View Post
How many times in our history does it need to be pointed out that when you reduce taxes you actually increase revenue to the gov?
wow, some conservatives still believe the US is on the right side of the laffer curve?
Vael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:01 PM   #95
Pooh-Bah
 
dinopoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Must...bet...more!
Posts: 5,200
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils View Post
Was I accusing him of troll posting? Nor was I troll posting.

I just find it very insulting to think that my property (income) is somehow the govs.
Please explain the difference between taxes and my condo fees. Is my condo association 'stealing' my money when they make me pay $400/month to live here? After all it's zomgmymoney, right?

Also, please explain how, if they decide to cut my condo fees, this will affect the services the condos are provided. Will we have to fund the cuts with, say, less gardening services, or maintenance?

So now, if they give us the fee reduction, but don't cut the services at the same time, wouldn't you call that an 'unfunded' cut to the condo fees?

Quote:
And that tax cuts are a zero sum game. How many times in our history does it need to be pointed out that when you reduce taxes you actually increase revenue to the gov?
But taxes are that their lowest point relative to GDP in history, so by your logic the govt coffers must just be overflowing, right?

But they're not. How do you explain that?

Quote:
If Obama would have given every one a tax holiday for 6 months when he took office instead of his "stimulus" our economy would be fine now.
Can you enlighten me on why the GOP tried to block the payroll tax holiday twice in two years then?
dinopoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:28 PM   #96
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
[Phill]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 40,145
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vael View Post
wow, some conservatives still believe the US is on the right side of the laffer curve?
The Laffer curve is like the best test ever created for whether someone has the first clue about economics or not. Cos 99% of the time the ones who dont love that thing without understanding it in the slightest including what its actual purpose is.
[Phill] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:30 PM   #97
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Ashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Polishing crystal football brb
Posts: 12,368
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vael View Post
wow, some conservatives still believe the US is on the right side of the laffer curve?
The next person (conservative or otherwise) who can tell me where we are on the LOLaffer curve will be the first.
Ashington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:42 PM   #98
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UTG-3
Posts: 3,093
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker View Post
1. Please explain the difference between taxes and my condo fees. Is my condo association 'stealing' my money when they make me pay $400/month to live here? After all it's zomgmymoney, right?

Also, please explain how, if they decide to cut my condo fees, this will affect the services the condos are provided. Will we have to fund the cuts with, say, less gardening services, or maintenance?

So now, if they give us the fee reduction, but don't cut the services at the same time, wouldn't you call that an 'unfunded' cut to the condo fees?



2. But taxes are that their lowest point relative to GDP in history, so by your logic the govt coffers must just be overflowing, right?

But they're not. How do you explain that?



3. Can you enlighten me on why the GOP tried to block the payroll tax holiday twice in two years then?
1. When you bought the condo you agreed to the fees. You could have bought an apt or a house to avoid condo fees. It is much more difficult to find a job where you don't pay taxes.

Your 2nd paragraph is looking at things backwards. You are not funding the cut in condo fees with less services. You are funding those services w/ the fees.

The cut in condo fees will most likely lead to a need to cut some of the services provided my the condo association, which like the govt I am sure is very inefficient. Condo owners will most likely be able to figure out how to make up for those lost services in more efficient ways. The cut in condo fees will tend to raise the value of the condos as well.

2. Well not ever, but for a really long time. Are you suggesting we finally ask the lower and middle classes to start paying their fair share?

3. Weren't they both temporary?
bahbahmickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:44 PM   #99
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Ashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Polishing crystal football brb
Posts: 12,368
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ineedaride2 View Post
Don't let the door portal plank hit you on your posterior ass on your way out.
My dead baby calf veal was delicious.
Ashington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:44 PM   #100
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,555
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker View Post
Please explain the difference between taxes and my condo fees. Is my condo association 'stealing' my money when they make me pay $400/month to live here? After all it's zomgmymoney, right?
I do not have a dog in this fight but this analogy in this context does not make sense. You are not being forced to live in that condo, you accepted the terms freely. Taxes on property are being forced upon you.

Quote:
Also, please explain how, if they decide to cut my condo fees, this will affect the services the condos are provided. Will we have to fund the cuts with, say, less gardening services, or maintenance?
This makes more sense as an analogy.

Quote:
So now, if they give us the fee reduction, but don't cut the services at the same time, wouldn't you call that an 'unfunded' cut to the condo fees?
You then water it down with this.....

Number of ways the HOA or whoever can become more efficeint, thereby saving money for the residents.....example: an equally effective security firm out bid the current higher paid firm.



I really don't care either way, just wanted point out that your analogy is not effective in some cases.
FleeingFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:45 PM   #101
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UTG-3
Posts: 3,093
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashington View Post
The next person (conservative or otherwise) who can tell me where we are on the LOLaffer curve will be the first.
We will never know where we are on the Laffer curve since there are way too many other variables. Not to mention those variables are constantly changing.

I fail to see you point here. Are you saying since we don't know where we are on it that we should ignore that it exists?
bahbahmickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:51 PM   #102
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Brons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,380
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

It kinda matters where you are on the curve if you're going to base policy on it.
Brons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:53 PM   #103
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Ashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Polishing crystal football brb
Posts: 12,368
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey View Post
Are you saying since we don't know where we are on it that we should ignore that it exists?
Close. What I'm saying is that if we cannot even calculate where we are on it at any given point in time then it is a pretty useless tool in anything other than abstract discussions. Obviously nothing comes in when we're at 0% and when we're at 100% but everything in between is wide open to interpretation/propaganda.
Ashington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 02:13 PM   #104
veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UTG-3
Posts: 3,093
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashington View Post
Close. What I'm saying is that if we cannot even calculate where we are on it at any given point in time then it is a pretty useless tool in anything other than abstract discussions. Obviously nothing comes in when we're at 0% and when we're at 100% but everything in between is wide open to interpretation/propaganda.
Ok good, glad to see we at least partly agree. Tired of hearing people say that raising tax rates will automatically raise tax revenues.

I would agree it would be a useless tool if commonsense was far more common than it is today. However, I believe we will continue to have a need to explain such basic concepts to liberals through pictures and simplified ideas.
bahbahmickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 02:20 PM   #105
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Ashington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Polishing crystal football brb
Posts: 12,368
Re: The Presidency of George W. Bush

Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey View Post
Ok good, glad to see we at least partly agree. Tired of hearing people say that raising tax rates will automatically raise tax revenues.
Not nearly as tired as I am of hearing idiots say things like, "Revenues ALWAYS INCREASE when we lower tax rates!"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bahbahmickey View Post
I would agree it would be a useless tool if commonsense was far more common than it is today. However, I believe we will continue to have a need to explain such basic concepts to liberals through pictures and simplified ideas.
I would settle with you just telling us where we are on the laffer curve right now.
Ashington is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive