Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotawerewolf
If he cannot engage productively, he should ignore - up to the point of decrying violation of legitimate rules.
I think the Ignore approach is bad because it precludes both, but it is better than rolling around in the **** alongside 'em.
What these people mean by "engage productively" is "agree with me".
I've contributed more actual substance to this discussion of free speech and how it ties in with both the larger context of Trump and the immediate context of this forum than any of these Free Speech Discourse Heroes, who basically just rewrite the same ****ing zero-knowledge-necessary take about Engagement With Ideas(no specific ideas ever identified) over and over again.
werewolf and Clovis are heartbroken over seeing asterisks in my posts because they know those are naughty words, oh my, heavens to betsy.
I'm pretty peeved myself over how it's incredibly obvious from their posts that they have no ****ing idea what they are talking about, they aren't aware of the context of any specifics, and generally are just pointlessly "virtue signalling" with no actual thought put into the debate.