Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

04-25-2017 , 07:54 AM
They fell for it too I guess. Or they decided to throw him a bone? Dunno.
04-25-2017 , 07:57 AM
By comparison though, Gorsuch was his biggest "accomplishment."
04-25-2017 , 08:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllTheCheese
Wat? You voted for Trump. You like Trump, and I have never heard you praise Johnson. You not voting for Trump makes no sense.
My political views more align with Johnson than with Trump.
04-25-2017 , 08:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Yeah I was gonna say 0% chance lew was a McMullin voters. McMullin guys would tend to value ethics highly.
I value ethics highly.
04-25-2017 , 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
My political views more align with Johnson than with Trump.
Shocking the one guy who makes Trump look smart.
04-25-2017 , 08:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
When Trump touts, everyone supporting him scrambles to find evidence to back him up. They're trying to reverse engineer the truth. Just look at the wiretapping claim and how far people have gone to justify it.

In the SCOTUS case, they often state the fact that other presidents rarely confirm someone in their first 100 days as rationale for his major achievement, ignoring the much bigger facts behind it. Just like everything else he does.
I wonder how many times scotus seats were available on day 1.
04-25-2017 , 08:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
Depends what state you live in. NJ was never going for Trump so it was any easy protest vote to vote Johnson, because I was never pulling the level for Hillary even if she was the only one on the ballot.
Your protest was not registered.
04-25-2017 , 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Your protest was not registered.
I have a clear conscious.
04-25-2017 , 08:33 AM
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...47826663460865

Going after another ally I see.
04-25-2017 , 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lew189
I value ethics highly.
Oh, I see. So what are your main concerns with the Trump administration so far, ethically speaking?
04-25-2017 , 08:45 AM
Read on CNN that Trump just imposed tariffs on Canadian lumber. Why are we buying lumber on the cheap from Canada when we have our own forests to destroy?
04-25-2017 , 08:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Your protest was not registered.
FWIW it was just as effective as yours was.
04-25-2017 , 08:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
awval is done if they ****ing take away 401k tax deduction. D.O.N.E.

I just cannot believe that the GOP would slice their own throat for that. They can't win without suburban upper middle class voters.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHA

**** off awval
04-25-2017 , 09:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...47826663460865

Going after another ally I see.
Too nitty to point out that Wisconsin doesn't have a border with Canada?
04-25-2017 , 09:11 AM
Trump’s New State Department Spokesperson Spread Anti-Muslim Hate as Fox News Anchor
https://theintercept.com/2017/04/24/...as-fox-anchor/
Quote:
The Trump administration’s new pick for State Department spokesperson, former Fox and Friends news anchor Heather Nauert, has spread toxic anti-Muslim stories for years — something that in normal times would disqualify her from taking on a top job in communicating American foreign policy to the global public.

Nauert anchored a segment in December 2013, about a YMCA group in St. Paul, Minnesota, that partnered with the local police department to offer swim classes for a group of Somali-American girls, as a positive form of community engagement.

Nauert described the event as the “minority becoming the majority at one community pool. Sharia law is now changing everything.” The chyron on the segment used an image of two young Somali-American girls with hijabs, with the headline “SHARIA LAW”



In a February 2009 hourlong special exploring “stealth jihad,” she brought in a who’s-who of anti-Muslim panelists to discuss Islam, including Robert Spencer, the anti-Muslim activist cited 162 times in Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik’s manifesto; Frank Gaffney, who theorizes that everyone from Clinton aide Huma Abedin to conservative activist Grover Norquist is in on a Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy; Tarek Fatah, who once tweeted that the entire country of Pakistan is “a cancerous tumour on [the] face of humanity”; and Nonie Darwish, who believes that “Islam should be feared, and should be fought, and should be conquered, and defeated, and annihilated.”

She also has a history of defending Trump’s anti-Muslim assertions. Trump baselessly implied in February that Sweden had recently suffered crime or terrorism as a result of the intake of migrants and refugees. A couple weeks later, when Sweden re-activated its draft in early March in response to Russian pressure, she claimed in a segment that it was a “sign that President Trump may be right about Sweden.”


https://twitter.com/HeatherNauert/st...-fox-anchor%2F


https://twitter.com/HeatherNauert/st...-fox-anchor%2F


https://twitter.com/AndrewKirell/sta...-fox-anchor%2F
04-25-2017 , 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Too nitty to point out that Wisconsin doesn't have a border with Canada?
Wouldn't have guessed that. One of those geography quirks like Denver being more east than El Paso.
04-25-2017 , 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson
Yeah, one of my the most hilarious memories of the campaign that I have is when I saw an interview with Ken Bone where he was talking about the pros and cons of Clinton and Trump and at one point he said something like, "Well Trump is going to be better for me financially, but ... "

Never heard what came after the "but" because I was laughing uncontrollably for a solid minute.
Has Kenny Bone's finance game been parsed itt? It's entirely possible that he's sitting on his late Aunt Gertie's collection of priceless cat-themed china.
04-25-2017 , 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Too nitty to point out that Wisconsin doesn't have a border with Canada?
Technically it does:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern..._United_States
04-25-2017 , 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
awval is done if they ****ing take away 401k tax deduction. D.O.N.E.

I just cannot believe that the GOP would slice their own throat for that. They can't win without suburban upper middle class voters.
Cautionary tale: Trump voters sure as **** didn't fall for the "Hillbilly Elegy" mythos. They know Trump is backed by well-off suburbanites. Don't let anyone on the left buy into it.
04-25-2017 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacktheDumb
To be honest, your democratic system is just ****. In most democracy's it is standard to have the choice between multiple (more then two) party's and it does make perfect sense to vote for them even if they cant win. A minority party can be part of the government through a coalition.

Having a two party system for decades doesnt sound healthy at all.
I agree completely, but thats the system we have, and voting 3rd party isn't going to change the system. Big money will never let Gary Johnson or anyone else up there to debate with the Dem/Rep

It was a two person race, if you voted for someone that wasn't Hillary, you voted for Trump.
04-25-2017 , 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
You mean technically it doesn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHip41
It was a two person race, if you voted for someone that wasn't Hillary, you voted for Trump.
More nittery: it's more like half a vote for Trump.
04-25-2017 , 09:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
You mean technically it doesn't.



More nittery: it's more like half a vote for Trump.

If everyone that voted for 3rd parties voted for Hillary, Hillary is the president.

So because of the third party votes, Trump wins.


Its not rocket science
04-25-2017 , 09:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
You mean technically it doesn't.
go on
04-25-2017 , 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
Too nitty to point out that Wisconsin doesn't have a border with Canada?
RE-nit to say it has a small water border.

EDIT: I see that we have other people who stalked Carmen Sandiego.
04-25-2017 , 09:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
go on
Quote:
Originally Posted by That Wikipedia article you linked
Wisconsin (has no geographic border....
.

      
m