Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Politics Gun Owners Thread*** *** Politics Gun Owners Thread***

05-25-2009 , 02:50 PM
Quote:
Machine-gun ownership has never been outlawed by the federal government as many people believe. In 1934, president Roosevelt signed the 1934 National Firearms Act into law. It was brought about with pressure from constitutionally ignorant politicians after the Kansas City massacre and recommendation from J. Edgar Hoover, then head of the FBI. Basically, the law put a $200 tax on any machine-gun purchased. Later a tax was put any short-barreled shotgun purchased. This tax would be paid to the federal government and federal approval of the gun sale was also needed. A machine-gun is described in federal law as a firearm that fires more than one round per single pull of the trigger.



Some common myths about machine gun ownership:

* A license required to own a machine gun, or any NFA (Class 3) firearm.
* A tax must be paid every year to own a Class 3 item.
* The BATFE can come into my house whenever they want to search it, stomp my kittens, and trash my house if I own machine guns.

No, There is a one time tax that must be paid to BATFE when you apply to have the registration transferred to your name. There is no ongoing yearly fee charged by the BATFE. For machine guns, suppressors, short barrel shotguns, short barrel rifles and destructive devices, there is a one time $200 tax in addition to the purchase price of the firearms. For AOW (Any Other Weapon) firearms, there is a $5 transfer tax.

And having legally registered NFA items in your home does not give the BATFE or the police the right to enter at will.

The Chief Law Enforcement Official, (CLEO), sheriff or chief of police (or limited others) must be willing to sign your Form 4 (Application for Tax Paid Transfer and Registration of an NFA Firearm) attesting that he does not know of any reason that you should not have the NFA firearm. BATFE will not process your Form 4 and you will not get the firearm. If you own a corporation, or LLC you can transfer the NFA firearm to the entity and no CLEO signature is necessary.
- www.blackguns.com

Not referenced, however.
05-25-2009 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
someone PM'd me asking about how to get an automatic weapon. I did some googling, and it is apparently no where near as difficult as I thought it was? I thought you needed a class III permit, but apparently thats only if you want to sell it - the only extraneous requirement is to pay a $200 tax - well, that, and that the weapons themselves cost around $10k lolz.

Can anyone confirm/deny my findings? As my understanding stands, getting a machine gun/submachine gun would not be such a bad idea.
same is true for a suppressor iirc, i have no idea how hard it is to get approval for these but i know tons of people have them so it can't be that difficult

EDIT: just saw boro's post, sounds similar to CCW (at least here in MN) where you need to send an application to the sheriff and he must approve it
05-25-2009 , 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
Not referenced, however.
wtf don't they put references. they think we're just going to go "ohhh, okay, great!" if they're wrong its prob a huge legal problem, lol.
05-25-2009 , 04:11 PM
Well seeing as anyone that improperly sells you a machine gun is probably going to prison for a few decades, and they sell machine guns, I'm pretty sure they know what they're talking about.
05-25-2009 , 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottySo
I didn't think they would really cost 10k though.
Some do, most the ones I have seen are between $3k and $10k.... That on top of the ridiculous amount of money you would spend on ammo it would be pretty expensive.

Heres an MP40 with a starting bid of $8,500
http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=129868951
Still kind of spendy.

MP44 starting bid $17k, prob has a lot to do with the fact thats its an original
http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=129408863
05-25-2009 , 05:59 PM
Machine guns are so expensive because the supply has been limited. When Reagan was president, the Firearm Owners Protection Act was passed which got some good reforms on gun laws. No more logging of ammunition sales among other things. One bad part of this law was the Hughes amendment. Any machine gun made after May 19, 1986 could not be sold to civilians. All the legal machine guns out there are registered before that date.
05-25-2009 , 09:08 PM
Does anyone have any idea what's going to happen October 1, 2009 when the Montana Firearms Freedom Act goes into effect? Have any Federal or State officials gone on record, forewarning or foreshadowing what's going to happen? What are the chances D.C. backs off and lets Montana do their pesky 10th amendment agenda?
05-25-2009 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonsaltron
What are the chances D.C. backs off and lets Montana do their pesky 10th amendment agenda?
given Obama and Holder's gun comments, I'd have to say 0.
05-25-2009 , 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
given Obama and Holder's gun comments, I'd have to say 0.
So the bill is likely going to be just another trumped document?
05-25-2009 , 09:14 PM
I imagine some confrontation between the state and the federal government will happen. I believe someone was telling me about Montanan officials saying if the FDA tried to enforce federal regulations, state officers would arrest them.

Should be interesting, whatever happens. I fully expect to hear Montana threatening to secede like they did during the Heller case.
05-25-2009 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
I imagine some confrontation between the state and the federal government will happen. I believe someone was telling me about Montanan officials saying if the FDA tried to enforce federal regulations, state officers would arrest them.

Should be interesting, whatever happens. I fully expect to hear Montana threatening to secede like they did during the Heller case.
FDA? Or ATF?
05-25-2009 , 09:31 PM
ATF tyvm.
05-25-2009 , 09:35 PM
I know they'd like D.C. to smell secession in their threats, I just wonder how far Montana is willing to go.
05-25-2009 , 09:38 PM
BRING IT ON!

05-25-2009 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
I imagine some confrontation between the state and the federal government will happen. I believe someone was telling me about Montanan officials saying if the FDA tried to enforce federal regulations, state officers would arrest them.

Should be interesting, whatever happens. I fully expect to hear Montana threatening to secede like they did during the Heller case.
hahaha montana is awesome
05-26-2009 , 01:28 AM
Well, this thread wasn't intended to be about gun control, but I guess it's sort of turned into that, so:

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Holds that the Second Amendment Applies to the States
05-26-2009 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borodog
- www.blackguns.com

Not referenced, however.
From another forum I frequent, a post from one of the moderators detailing the steps to get a machine gun etc in PA:

http://forum.pafoa.org/nfa-class-3-t...a-jaybell.html

This forum is pretty credible, a few lawyers around that jump on mistakes.
06-08-2009 , 05:47 AM
Mentioned picking up a gun when I move to my friends the other night. One agreed that an appartment complex whose security method is 'provide your own security' leaves much to be desired, so it may be a good idea.

Another didn't. I talked to him about getting a gun for his place, but he didn't because he thought 'it makes no sense for someone to rob' him, also, that it isn't likely.

I tried explaining it in terms of thinking like an insurance policy, but I'm not used to arguing this side, so I probably sucked. =(
06-08-2009 , 07:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
Mentioned picking up a gun when I move to my friends the other night. One agreed that an appartment complex whose security method is 'provide your own security' leaves much to be desired, so it may be a good idea.

Another didn't. I talked to him about getting a gun for his place, but he didn't because he thought 'it makes no sense for someone to rob' him, also, that it isn't likely.

I tried explaining it in terms of thinking like an insurance policy, but I'm not used to arguing this side, so I probably sucked. =(
It sounds like he's basically unfamliar/afraid of guns. I wouldn't recommend people like that keep one for self defense. The proper order of operations is to first learn, then evaluate from a more educated point of view, then buy if they decide they are up for the responsibility. Some are and will, and some just aren't and never will be. But at least they made an informed decision.
06-08-2009 , 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metric
It sounds like he's basically unfamliar/afraid of guns. I wouldn't recommend people like that keep one for self defense. The proper order of operations is to first learn, then evaluate from a more educated point of view, then buy if they decide they are up for the responsibility. Some are and will, and some just aren't and never will be. But at least they made an informed decision.
How do I start? Literally, what's my first step on the gun ownership path?
06-08-2009 , 12:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
How do I start? Literally, what's my first step on the gun ownership path?
If you don't know anyone personally who can show you how to shoot, go to a range where you can ask for someone to show you basic safety and handling, and where you can rent a pistol and shoot in a controlled environment. Many ranges will also offer various classes, depending on what you want to learn. Generally, people are happy to help complete beginners and will offer all kinds of advice.

Of course it isn't remotely rocket science. But it does require coming to terms with a bit of awareness and responsibility for safety, and there are some well-known techniques that will accelerate your ability as you practice (which is incidentally quite a fun process).

This assumes you're in the US -- I don't know how it works in other countries.
09-18-2009 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
So I'm trying to sell this now, looking to replace it with something in .308.

Any recommendations? I'm thinking about this:


The M1A Socom 16

And also possibly an XCR, though they haven't come out with their .308 set up yet.
09-19-2009 , 12:40 AM
your 223 is hard to beat for the ability to carry a large amount of rounds on your person. 500 rounds of 308 gets heavy fast.
09-19-2009 , 02:02 AM
223 fail
09-19-2009 , 02:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taso
That was 7.62, not .223 (5.56)

edit: 7.62 is pretty close to .308 iirc...

      
m