Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago From my cold, dead. hands! Except in Detroit and Chicago

12-15-2012 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
And no, it is not a "mental health issue period".

How many children died in the mass school stabbing in China yesterday? The correct answer is "zero".

Two apparent crazies (remember, the CT shooter has not been established to be insane). One had a gun, one had a knife. In one, there are 20 dead six year olds. In the other, there are none. On it's face, it's more than a mental health issue.
This. It's simply a "mental health issue period" only if taking guns out of the equation is unacceptable. Then ya, I guess society may as well work on what they can if the real (and real obvious) issue is off limits.
12-15-2012 , 10:14 PM
So due to all the gun snatching talk, I felt the need to go get a totally irrational gun.

So I did.

Spoiler:


12-15-2012 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
Just a paperweight:

Just for the LULz, I'm curious if you'd mind amusing us by telling us how you envision the process for obtaining that gun to go.
12-15-2012 , 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mondogarage
Trolls gonna troll.

You got more to contribute other than more pictures of adult Counter-Strike cosplay, we're all ears.
Any possible chance you can logically show that you're a huge fan of privacy from government while maintaining your desire for millions and millions of US citizens to turn over their medical histories to the government?
12-15-2012 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
LOLZ no... you are are a completely irrational child who is scared of the equivalent of a paper weight. If you had the same sort of fear of cars, swimming pools, or laders you would be locked in an asylum.

And again you are ignoring the facts, and not looking at the mental health issues that cause this sort of outlier behavior.
Tell that to the children yesterday. Oh ya, cars, swimming pools, and ladders aren't explicitly designed to cause harm.
12-15-2012 , 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
LOLZ no... you are are a completely irrational child who is scared of the equivalent of a paper weight. If you had the same sort of fear of cars, swimming pools, or laders you would be locked in an asylum.

And again you are ignoring the facts, and not looking at the mental health issues that cause this sort of outlier behavior.
Get back to me when paperweights kill entire classrooms full of students about once a year.

Gun nuts need to be careful this time around, people like me who dont own guns are generally pretty sympathetic towards the 2nd amendment and gun ownership on general principle. But a lot of folks are starting to wonder if we really should have this happening every 2 months, and having gun nuts make super callous remarks is not making you all any friends.

I know gun folks are feeling rightfully smug because they know having all the super small population density states in their corner means it would be super hard to amend the constitution even if eventually 85% of the population want that, but you all are not helping your cause at all in times like these.
12-15-2012 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Now I know that my last few statements are going to cause a ****storm of furious butthurt, let me clarify ftr.

from a personal standpoint, I am still fighting the urge to vomit, freak out, and cry my eyes out over what happened yesterday. I would give anything to have a button to press or other magical solution to use in order to erase this person and everything associated with him from the human timeline.

from a realistic and purely utilitarian perspective guns have more value than 5X the current level of firearms murders.

I am not even a utilitarian and utility alone is a waffelcrushing argument. When you add to that everything else there is just no question.

Again this is a mental health issue not a tool issue. I understand that you guys want an easy answer, but there isn't one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
just want to make sure this is highlighted and pointed out
highlight away... and we still have cars and sedatives because their utility completely outweighs the risk.

ahh **** it im supposed to be out of her you kids have fun
12-15-2012 , 10:27 PM
Who called out the gun nuts?
12-15-2012 , 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by surftheiop
having gun nuts make super callous remarks is not making you all any friends.
that should only be reserved for anti-gun fearmongers?
12-15-2012 , 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
I have been avoiding this thread and this issue, mainly because I knew that you ambulance chasing scum would be dancing on the graves of innocent children for your own ignorant benefit. So yeah.. I didn't want to double down on my disappointment with humanity...

and with that im out of here. you tards sling whatever poo you want, I don't care.
The NRA?
12-15-2012 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by surftheiop
Get back to me when paperweights kill entire classrooms full of students about once a year.
not that I'm willing to try because im not a psyco but this would be trivially easy to do.

Quote:
Gun nuts need to be careful this time around, people like me who dont own guns are generally pretty sympathetic towards the 2nd amendment and gun ownership on general principle. But a lot of folks are starting to wonder if we really should have this happening every 2 months, and having gun nuts make super callous remarks is not making you all any friends.
yeah I know... but being a completely irrational lunatic who can't comprehend logic, reason, utility, economics, morality, natural rights, or history doesn't win you any fans either.

Quote:
I know gun folks are feeling rightfully smug because they know having all the super small population density states in their corner means it would be super hard to amend the constitution even if eventually 80% of the people want that, but you all are not helping your cause at all in times like these.
Again its not smugness, its outright fear that ignorant assclowns are about to start civil war II.
12-15-2012 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoefish
Who called out the gun nuts?
low key, pvn, etc. have been here all along, they just called in backup
12-15-2012 , 10:30 PM
good night thread
12-15-2012 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
It's missing some specifics, but it's not a bad place to start at.
Its good to hear there seems to be at least some common ground here. Too many people IIT are like "he wants to ban all guns, thats ******ed" when pretty much nobody is saying that or "he wants to give guns to everyone" when pretty much nobody is saying that (except that tsao guy). I'm not saying goofy's idea of adopting similar laws to japan is the perfect solution, but i do agree it seems like a solid starting point and has some good ideas in it. It prob wont satisfy the extreme pro-gun people or the extreme anti gun people but it seems like it has the potential to be a solution most people would be OK with.
12-15-2012 , 10:34 PM
Could I get a quick raise of hands on the number of people willing to intervene if witnessing a paper weight attack vs. a shooting?
12-15-2012 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Leme pose for you a hypothetical. In the room I am typing this from there are 14 firearms, there are more in other areas, I also have maybe 30,000 rounds of various ammo. Now .. if I were to snap and want to kill a bunch of people I wouldn't even consider using these except as a last resort. I can use simple primers and powder to set off a bomb at the airport that is one exit south of me and kill hundreds or thousands. Come on man... use your brain.
Try not to snap pls.
12-15-2012 , 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by #Thinman
Could I get a quick raise of hands on the number of people willing to intervene if witnessing a paper weight attack vs. a shooting?
I'd be more likely to intervene in a gun attack than a paperweight attack.
12-15-2012 , 10:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
not that I'm willing to try because im not a psyco but this would be trivially easy to do.



yeah I know... but being a completely irrational lunatic who can't comprehend logic, reason, utility, economics, morality, natural rights, or history doesn't win you any fans either.



Again its not smugness, its outright fear that ignorant assclowns are about to start civil war II.
In 30 years once you can't have all of your sweet metallic penile prosthesis to wave around anymore, just remember its comments like this that swayed public opinion against you.
12-15-2012 , 10:44 PM
cool - adults with above average intelligence that less than 3 guns wonder why others with above average intelligence don't want idiots having guns
12-15-2012 , 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
If we're going to have more gun restrictions, can we start with banning ownership by anybody who thinks having armed civilians in an elementary school is a good idea?
cosigned.


the answer to the gun problem. more guns.
12-15-2012 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeBlis
Competency of murderous lunatics is not what we are arguing here.

Leme pose for you a hypothetical. In the room I am typing this from there are 14 firearms, there are more in other areas, I also have maybe 30,000 rounds of various ammo. Now .. if I were to snap and want to kill a bunch of people I wouldn't even consider using these except as a last resort. I can use simple primers and powder to set off a bomb at the airport that is one exit south of me and kill hundreds or thousands. Come on man... use your brain.
Competency isn't what he's arguing either. In Japan i'm sure they make it tough to get powder and primers and most other possible tools for a mass killing spree as well. It's the easy availability of those tools in the US that's part of the problem. You call it freedom, I call it being reckless.
12-15-2012 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Tsao
k but if she had a gun 20 children would have been saved.
This is a fact. If she had a gun she would have guaranteed to take him out. Absolutely no chance she's still dead. It's a fact that she absolutely would have outshot the shooter and saved all the kids.

Well thought out post by taso.
12-15-2012 , 10:57 PM
tsao's insistence on "armed teacher = no spree" is one of the lulziest things in this thread
12-15-2012 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
tsao's insistence on "armed teacher = no spree" is one of the lulziest things in this thread
Yeah I mean I don't know the exact situation that happened at the school, but unless you frequently practice shooting, isnt it rather difficult to hit something at more than like 25 feet away with handgun? (Especially if your a school teacher just wondering what that noise is in the hall and it turns out to be an experienced gun user shooting an assault rifle at you).
12-15-2012 , 11:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
It is confirmed the mother was a gun nut. How many of you in this thread have taught your kids to shoot?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1220893



Hmm, this seems familiar.

This is the only story I've read about the mom so far. She very well may be a "gun nut" but what in this particular story backs that label IYO?

      
m