Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Freedom of speech, press, the free flow of information and the like, that are integral to our democratic way of life, greatly increase the chance that if you are right, your message will catch on with large numbers of people, so that through fair elections you can gain the political power to prevent those catastrophic things from happening.
The main difficulty for the left in communicating its ideas is that most people have a set of assumptions so far removed from reality that it is really impossible to have a conversation.
Here, you talk about freedom of speech like it is a given. It has never existed for all practical purposes.
Newspapers and other media outlets depend on advertising. Without four-page corporate colour supplements they go under. So they won't run stories which offend their corporate clients too much.
So, for example, the Daily Telegraph noticeably sat on the HSBC banking scandal for over a year. We know that happened because the finance editor quit in protest and stated publicly this was happening repeatedly: in most cases we won't ever know.
You think we have free speech. This is because the idea has been drummed into you from an early age. It is a noble idea. But it doesn't exist any more in a capitalist state than it does in a dictatorship. In fact the control mechanism is far more effective and insidious than the crude methods dictatorships use.
I have to write something article length to explain one misconception you have that most of the public share: that's one of the reasons why it is impossible for a far left candidate to win, even in France where political radicalism is arguably strongest.