Law and Order 2 - Page 108 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

Law and Order 2

...

Page 108 of 235

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158 208

Last

Page 108 of 235

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158 208

Last

02-27-2013 , 10:39 AM

#2676

pvn

Guest

Posts: n/a

we should have a "cop shoots dog" containment thread

02-27-2013 , 10:54 AM

#2677

DblBarrelJ

2+2 Resident Enforcer

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,857

Don't we?

02-27-2013 , 11:19 AM

#2678

pvn

Guest

Posts: n/a

Oh if this is that thread then I guess we need a "cops **** up and kill innocents during botched macho cowboy paramilitary drug raid cause they can't figure out the right house" containment thread.

02-27-2013 , 01:08 PM

#2679

DblBarrelJ

2+2 Resident Enforcer

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,857

I think one thread can contain two things.

02-27-2013 , 02:01 PM

#2680

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

*Head explode*

02-27-2013 , 02:05 PM

#2681

DblBarrelJ

2+2 Resident Enforcer

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,857

Damn. I really did it. I completely shattered the BBS idea. In one eight word post, I've changed EVERYTHING.

02-27-2013 , 02:18 PM

#2682

grando1.0

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 17,111

I see absolutely nothing wrong with killing a dog that's being aggressive around anyone's kids while not on leash

02-27-2013 , 03:29 PM

#2683

OmahaFanatical4

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 5,123

Spencer Adam Schulman from the comments on the article

Quote:

The dogs were harmless, look how small they are. The reason they weren't on the leash was because I was helping my father whose foot was pinned under a rock in the stream. It's kind of hard to help someone stuck in water while simultaneously holding on to three dogs. Besides it was Catawba Falls where there are dogs running free all the time. One more thing the article failed to stress was the fact that there were two other hikers who witnessed the incident and gave statements to the police. They were absolutely mortified by this guy's overreaction and both went on record saying that it was completely unnecessary. The dog was nowhere near the kids when he shot her nor was she lunging in their direction. The whole thing was a disaster and completely avoidable. Guy is just a typical hick law enforcement looking for any excuse to use his weapon to 'defend himself'. He wasn't remorseful and was even joking around with the other officers who arrive.

Cops love to shoot people and dogs.

02-27-2013 , 03:30 PM

#2684

OmahaFanatical4

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 5,123

Seems like unnecessarily firing your weapon is pretty dangerous.

02-27-2013 , 03:39 PM

#2685

DblBarrelJ

2+2 Resident Enforcer

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,857

Quote:

Originally Posted by grando1.0

I see absolutely nothing wrong with killing a dog that's being aggressive around anyone's kids while not on leash

Bro, if you haven't noticed he could've shot a visibly rabid wolf and the response would be the same.

02-27-2013 , 03:59 PM

#2686

OmahaFanatical4

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 5,123

Who are we supposed to believe? The disinterested eye witnesses, or the cop who recklessly endangered people's lives by murdering a harmless dog, and needs to fabricate a story in order to avoid felony charges? Clearly a LEO would never lie. Police officers are our friends.

02-27-2013 , 04:01 PM

#2687

DblBarrelJ

2+2 Resident Enforcer

Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 13,857

Yea bro, that dogs owner is a disinterested witness.

The worst part is, I'd probably agree with you that shooting the dog was unneccessary, but you tack on so much extra stupid **** I have to LOL at first it takes a long time to get around to it.

02-27-2013 , 04:44 PM

#2688

pvn

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ

Bro, if you haven't noticed he could've shot a visibly rabid wolf and the response would be the same.

lol @ u

02-27-2013 , 04:45 PM

#2689

pvn

Guest

Posts: n/a

Quote:

Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ

Yea bro, that dogs owner is a disinterested witness.

oh and the cop who was playing target practice is disinterested?

and I guess we should ignore the actually disinterested third party witnesses?

02-27-2013 , 06:59 PM

#2690

grando1.0

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 17,111

the third party witnesses' statement may be why the police don't care

honestly, I would have no issue if someone shot that dog if there was a 0.0000001% chance that dog would hurt their kids

I'm sure he really wanted to kill rover in front of his kids YEAHHHHHHH I SHOT THAT DEM DERE DOG KIDSSSSSS like wtf

02-27-2013 , 07:00 PM

#2691

vhawk01

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 31,866

Quote:

Originally Posted by grando1.0

I see absolutely nothing wrong with killing a dog that's being aggressive around anyone's kids while not on leash

And vice versa

02-27-2013 , 07:01 PM

#2692

grando1.0

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 17,111

Quote:

Originally Posted by vhawk01

And vice versa

killing kids being aggressive towards a dog?

02-27-2013 , 10:16 PM

#2693

OmahaFanatical4

banned

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 5,123

Quote:

honestly, I would have no issue if someone shot that dog if there was a 0.0000001% chance that dog would hurt their kids

Really? You know firearms are dangerous and not toys right? You shouldn't just go firing them without cause. What happens is, after you press the trigger, there's a huge explosive force, and then a small piece of metal goes flying out the end of this device. That piece of metal has the potential to hurt or even kill someone. It's also a felony, not that it matters, since cops are allowed to commit felonies.

02-27-2013 , 10:45 PM

#2694

grando1.0

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 17,111

yep I'm pretty sure he aimed between his son and daughter to get the dog between the eyes for TEN POINTS BABY!!!

Last edited by grando1.0; 02-27-2013 at 10:45 PM. Reason: ONE HUNDRED AND EIGGGGGHTY!

02-27-2013 , 11:31 PM

#2695

Huehuecoyotl

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 29,257

You know who you never hear shooting dogs? Mail carriers.

02-27-2013 , 11:45 PM

#2696

grando1.0

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 17,111

easier to sue for holla dollas

(plus they don't take kids to work)
(plus most dogs aren't in the mailbox)
(plus they just avoid houses with dogs)

02-27-2013 , 11:58 PM

#2697

zikzak

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 22,198

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huehuecoyotl

You know who you never hear shooting dogs? Mail carriers.

I knew a dog who barked at the mailman because the mailman gave him treats when he barked because the mailman was afraid of the barking dog. That was a wicked smart dog.

02-28-2013 , 02:52 AM

#2698

joeyDizzle

banned

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 2,227

The dog was barking. He had it coming.

02-28-2013 , 04:51 AM

#2699

JayTeeMe

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 29,410

Chances the shooter is in jail if the story is "Off-duty pharmacist shoots dog"? 97%?

02-28-2013 , 05:04 AM

#2700

Bremen

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 15,799

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayTeeMe

Chances the shooter is in jail if the story is "Off-duty pharmacist shoots dog"? 97%?

0.1%

Even if you're in the wrong, you're rarely going to jail for shooting a dog. You might have to pay damages to the owner, which at most will be a couple hundred for the cost of the dog.

Now if PETA ran the world...

Page 108 of 235

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158 208

Last

...

Page 108 of 235

First

8 58 88 98 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 118 128 158 208

Last