Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Law and Order 2 Law and Order 2

02-18-2013 , 02:49 PM
hmmm... It could.
02-18-2013 , 03:07 PM
Quote:
Ah, ok Omaha, so you weren't really interested in discussing a topic,
I'm certainly not interested in discussing the topic of how this murder was justified or anything less than a heinous crime, no. But yes, I think you have it pretty accurately summated. My position is **** da popo. The abuses are systemic and will continue so long as they are not criminally liable for any action they under take. Which means, so long as we have state monopoly policing and state monopoly justice courts, I will keep saying **** da popo because it's human nature to abuse power.

But some day, when the revolution comes, and police are provided on the market like bicycles, and cops who abuse individuals who are not initiating aggression are immediately fired and held criminally liable for their actions, I will no longer have a hatred against police because they will no longer be ****ing us over at every turn but instead protecting property rights and individuals from the aggression of others.


but until that day, **** da popo
02-18-2013 , 03:10 PM
And the "Revolution", will it include gunz?
02-18-2013 , 03:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaFanatical4
But some day, when the revolution comes, and police are provided on the market like bicycles...
You mean like private security guards?
02-18-2013 , 03:15 PM
Why it gotta be bicycles?

Why not segways?
02-18-2013 , 03:19 PM
On a personal note, a few months from now, I could be rotting in prison for the next 9 years.

viva the justice system!
02-18-2013 , 03:21 PM
Well that's rather vague.

Can you tell us more?
02-18-2013 , 03:25 PM
got busted for possesion of a schedule i controlled substance. apparently that's a big deal.
#mylifeisover
02-18-2013 , 03:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaFanatical4
got busted for possesion of a schedule i controlled substance. apparently that's a big deal.
#mylifeisover
02-18-2013 , 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaFanatical4
got busted for possesion of a schedule i controlled substance. apparently that's a big deal.
#mylifeisover
Well at least you learned not to struggle when handcuffed
02-18-2013 , 03:37 PM
*pardon me, maximum penalty of 7 years in prison. of course i might not get that, maybe the search was illegal, maybe I can make a deal, who knows. but either way it sucks. I wasn't hurting anyone, aside from myself, and yet here I face the prospect of rotting in prison alongside murderers, child rapists, armed robbers... truly violent psychopaths.

le sigh
02-18-2013 , 03:41 PM
oh, and in case that wasn't bad enough, the cops felt they were justified in helping themselves to the two stacks of high society i was carrying with me (came almost directly from a tournament series where I played @ the same table as former world champion Johnathon Duhamel... incidentally saw him pull off a really sick 6k river bluff w/ a high on a double paired board). "proceeds of crime" what a joke these asset seizure laws are. we'll just take your property because we're the government and **** you that's why.
02-18-2013 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaFanatical4
*pardon me, maximum penalty of 7 years in prison. of course i might not get that, maybe the search was illegal, maybe I can make a deal, who knows. but either way it sucks. I wasn't hurting anyone, aside from myself, and yet here I face the prospect of rotting in prison alongside murderers, child rapists, armed robbers... truly violent psychopaths.

le sigh
Well, i mean, you know the law and possible consequences of your actions right?

I agree that drug possession is malum prohibitum and not malum in se but getting caught is more of a bad decision than a bad break.
02-18-2013 , 03:41 PM
Where was Saylor's health aide when all this happened? I haven't seen any statement from that person.
02-18-2013 , 03:47 PM
ya ya ya. Look jayteeme, I grew up in a household of three women, I'm well aware that everything that has ever happened in the history of mankind is my fault. and kudos on teaching me those latin terms. I guess I never really considered I could go to prison, just because i liked to put something up my nose. Personally I love ketamine... it's an anti-depressant, seems pretty non toxic (on the other hand it does make me pretty ****ing delusional, so who knows could be causing some brain damage)... I just don't see why I should rot in prison because while other people are out poisoning their livers and drinking beer, getting into fights, having sex with ugly women and crashing into families of four with their vehicles I prefer to get ****ed up on ketamine and play internet chess or make like a million queens in sc 2 and loose to some marine maurauder mix.

I don't even really understand how I got caught. I think the ****ing taxi driver informed on me. I get into a cab, then the next thing I know I'm somewhere downtown trying to hail a cab, and then the cop is talking to me, and then I'm bounded and shackled on my side in the back of the cruiser. whatever. life goes on. another victory for law and order.
02-18-2013 , 03:53 PM
I'm not going to defend this country's drug laws, but having drugs on you when you've got a long string of priors is pants-on-head stupid.
02-18-2013 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaFanatical4

, and yet here I face the prospect of rotting in prison alongside murderers, child rapists, armed robbers... truly violent psychopaths.
Canadian prisons that bad?
02-18-2013 , 03:59 PM
I'm not sure, I guess I'll be able to tell u in 5 years. Look forward to my trip report "I got raped up the ass, but the food was alright".
02-18-2013 , 04:02 PM
Good thread about going to prison:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34...ty-prison-547/
02-18-2013 , 05:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
Omaha, what's the takeaway from that story IYO?

What did the police officers do wrong in your view?

(I'd like to note that they did do something wrong, so I'm not saying they didnt, but none of you will correctly guess what it was)
I'm gonna guess arresting him in the first place was the mistake.

Off duty officers have arrest power, but in the past you've been quite clear that departments rather frown on their officers doing this.
02-18-2013 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bremen
I'm gonna guess arresting him in the first place was the mistake.

Off duty officers have arrest power, but in the past you've been quite clear that departments rather frown on their officers doing this.
I dunno, guy is not leaving and being combative whatcha gonna do?
02-18-2013 , 06:17 PM
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index...ing_scene.html

this story just gets more and more awe-inspiring as it goes on, you definitely need to read the whole thing.

Cliffnotes: car with unarmed civilians gets shot up by cops (in a school parking lot!), other cops think the civilians are shooting at them and then it goes downhill pretty quickly.

To the cops' credit, nobody tried to plant a gun on the victims.

choice quote:

Quote:
"He's pointing the gun. He's pointing the gun out the back window. Heads up. Heads up. Passenger is pointing a gun out the back window. Everybody be careful," Siefer said.

Siefer later told investigators he didn't actually see a gun. "Despite not actually seeing a gun, Siefer broadcast on the radio that the passenger has just pointed a gun out the rear window," the report said.
02-18-2013 , 06:27 PM
Since he just wanted to see the movie again I'd tell him we're not showing it again today but there is a theatre down the road...

Or just get money from his caretaker for another ticket...

If you need to arrest him call for an on-duty officer to do it.
02-18-2013 , 06:29 PM
the idea that cops would ever alter or fabricate evidence in this day and age is absurd imo. checks and balances.

http://billingsgazette.com/news/stat...16d11e28a.html
02-18-2013 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DblBarrelJ
From Wikipedia:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positional_asphyxia

Here's the basics:

Guy gets combative, police are forced to place him on the ground to restrain him.

Once his hands are brought behind his back, he's struggling more to breathe, causing him to panic.

Once he begins to panic, he begins to fight more.

Once he begins to fight more, the cops apply more pressure to attempt to control him.

I think you see where this is going.

Now I know this isn't nearly as sexy as some dirty TV cop you watch choking the life out of a man with Down syndrome then going right back to work, but yea, that's what went on.

It's a training lapse, I will say that. The dept is on the hook for millions civilly, but there's no criminal intent, no criminal negligence unless their training records show they've been exposed to that training. In my experience, unless they are involved in a position that requires a higher than likely chance of having to chase someone a long distance, they likely weren't aware of that.
No criminal negligence? So if instead of being off duty cops, these guys were just some 18 year olds working "movie theater security" because they were too stupid to work the popcorn machine, do you think they'd still just be on the hook for some civil penalties, and have no criminal liability whatsoever?

Am I allowed to tackle some guy, hold him down, and ultimately cause his death, as long as I dont know any better? I'm pretty ****ing stupid, you'd be amazed at the things I dont "know any better."

      
m