Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadis
Am i stupid or something ?
Edit : Oh the "or slogans" part. excuse me, nazi state,may be she just have to tattoo it on her forehead,what would be awesome.
|
Quote:
|
violates the district's dress code, which prohibits clothing with "nudity No, vulgarity Yes, obscenity Yes, profanity Perhaps, and double entendre pictures No or slogans Yes."
|
I mean its all subjective and open to interpretation but they can easily claim the above yes's without difficulty. Vulgarity is a slam dunk. Obscenity - if they used breasts instead of boobies it would be harder to judge but they can push this one (not that they need to at this point). Obscenity is pretty much a slam dunk given just how subjective that one is.
Profanity is a grey area, you yanks are weird with swearing in general and if there is a religious teacher involved it can get weirder still. Double entendre, well the campaign slogan is pretty much the definition of it plus see Dvaut:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVaut1
Extremely disappointing content for a thread an OP titled "I Love Boobies!" posted in the middle of a weekend night US time. I know I'm not the only one who assumed someone got drunk and posted pictures of titties all over the thread.
|
Im not saying its the right thing to do. But then im extremely relaxed about swearing, double entendre and general obscenity. I also dont run a school. Even if you assume they are wrong to do it they certainly have all the grounds in the world to do so which is what i was saying.
The fact the kids are suing the school is hilarious. Isnt there several specific cases where it was specifically shown in case law that freedom of speech does not extend to slogans on school ground?