You forgot all those sluts who like to eat babies.

In your mind I probably said that. How dare I challenge the big left machine. They're not eating babies, just carrying mattress' around trying to ruin an innocent man's life. ....and getting school credit for it I might add.

You can call people on the right hateful all you like, a lot of them are. But IMO as an unbiased observer the right does a far far better job in shaming it's most extreme members. The left applauds theirs and gives them jobs teaching at Universities.

.....When I tell a rightytard that there is no evidence God exists or that I don't think it's super easy for a Black kid to "just get a scholarship", at worst they get a little angry and I get some heated debate. Tell a lefty, "well , I don't think Darren Wilson murdered the guy"... and you're a psychopathic homophobic sexist racist who is blocked on Facebook. In the United States of America; the left-minded control. Universities are a breeding ground for already liberal minded children to have all their pre-concieved notions 100% confirmed AND to also learn that anyone who disagrees with them is intellectually inferior and needs to, "like seriously check their privilege"
Of course you will get more hateful and stupid soundbytes from the right, they are the ones losing. I'll admit I do live in NY. Perhaps if I lived in Alabama I'd hate on the right some more.

Appears staying on topic isn't all that relevant on this website, considering the fact that in PU a thread just had two full days in the Trump thread that consisted of arguing over a bet based on the income of two posters, with nary about the Donald. We derailed for a couple of posts. It's not the end of the world.

Relatively few people took that video seriously, and it was relevant for about 24 hours. Horrendous example. Try harder.

You're way high on the "half" estimate with respect to liberals, and kind of high with respect to conservatives. And cons get labeled while libs don't because the racist, backwards, hateful drivel comes from their side. Sorry, but people like me are the ones that aren't interested in thought processes that pre-date the Civil War.

All good points, except I don't see the right shaming its own more than the left.

This response makes my blood boil because it's exactly the friggan point. Idiotic leftist comments are quickly swept under the rug and are only relevant for 24 hours usually. My whole argument is that the media is absurdly biased in it's reporting. At least China TELLS YOU it's censoring your news. We're censored, and we don't even know it. Only reddneck bum****s and liberals themselves take idiotic right comments very seriously. But MSNBC and every other god damn website will make sure we hear about them day after day after day after day after day after day. When our civilisation falls and a new one is reborn thousands of years from now their students are going to have to take classes titled "The Western Media and the Fall of the West"

You're right about this I guess, shaming was the wrong word. Non extremist rights tend to ignore and pretend their extremest counterparts do not exist. Too often I see the left embrace it's extremism.

You, uh, reach the point of "blood boil(ing)" over Internet political banter with strangers? Good God, people on this site have thin skin.

The "idiotic leftist comments" weren't swept under the rug; it's just that the woman-walking-in-NYC story wasn't all that big, died quickly, and was taken seriously by very few people. I doubt the "idiotic leftist comments" about this reached the level of 1% of the RWNJ insanity that spawned on the Internet on 6/26, for example.

Well, chill blood boiling was more an expression. I actually misunderstood you, I thought you were talking about the guy on MSNBC that said the Roof shooting would have been worse if everyone in the church was armed.

Now that I know you're talking about the street-walking video, I'm going to have to just flat out disagree with your take on it. It was relevant for far longer than 24 hours and people did take it seriously. Also you lost me with your last sentence, please let me know what you're referring to.

Pretty simple. Your assertion is that leftist insanity is equal to right-wing insanity. I disagree. I gave you an example of RWNJ commenting craziness - the outrage over SSM legalization 3 months ago - and asserted that it is way worse than any perceived outrage over the woman-walking-in-Manhattan video.

You also must live on a different planet than I do. The street-walking thing came and went so quick that I doubt few people even remember it. I doubt anyone intelligent considers it some horrendously offensive example of mistreatment of women in inner cities.

So if...
Liberalism can be reduced down to - those who want change
Conservatism can be reduced down to - those who do not want change

The ideologies become "ridiculous" in the case of conservatives when they refuse to give in to change where it is clear a change should come. Liberals become "ridiculous" when they ask me to care about, or change my behavior over something silly such as "woman-walking-in-NYC"

I think we can probably agree on this. (I hope)


There are a finite # of issues that conservatives can cling too and an near infinite # of nonsense liberals can complain about; much of which I agree will not gain too much traction or will be replaced by a new hot topic the next day. To put it another way, there are a gazillion mini-incidents that liberals can complain is racist, sexist, etc-ist that to any reasonable person, clearly is not racist, sexist, etc-ist.
Does
1)Obama inviting the clock kid to the White House,
2) or giving a speech on how we need to fix the wage gap,
3) the woman walking in nyc, EVERYTHING the Huffington Post writes about, 4)some liberals are now insisting we refer people who are not transexuals as: sisexuals...


....do all of these little things add up and equalize the much more limited annoying conservative talking points; which are basically no SSM, go to Church, and a moronic display of cultural ignorance here and there.

I believe the answer is 100% yes, and I say this as an atheist! If we continue to disagree there is much more we can do about it, as how "ridiculous" we find something is rather subjective. However, I have found that in the last few years I have shooken off nearly all of the Cultural-Marxisism shoved down by throat by my liberal-biased University, and I am likely finding many liberal talking points more absurd than most Americans.

Abortions draw in money. Gay marraige licenses draw in money. Parades draw in money. This thread has actually nothing to do with politics. The reason no one has a parade for Sklansky is b/c no one would be there.
Sent from my LG-D415 using 2+2 Forums

Apparently the pope met with Kim Davis privately and "thanked her for her courage" and told her to "remain strong". This really bothers me

What should he have told her?

Nothing, he had no reason to meet her.

Hey guys, PyramidScheme is annoyed by liberals, and that should be equal on the scale to denying people their civil rights.

That Leviticus is bull**** so we have no reason to be bigoted toward homosexuals and that she should be ashamed of herself.

Cultural Marxism is just another word for not truly American which PyramidScheme is and that liberal egghead University isn't.

I don't think the Pope would say that

That's as close to a brush off as it gets.

should tho

Has that been confirmed by anyone but her lawyer? Remember he also claimed that there were 100,000 people at a prayer rally for her in Peru, which turned out to be complete fiction.

If true, though, my respect for the Pope is even lower, and I am even more disgusted with the con he is running on American liberals.

Meeting with her privately is a brush off? I don't think that makes any sense

BBC says the Vatican spokesman refused to confirm nor deny the meeting

Yeah, just saw a few stories. They "don't deny" the meeting took place. What a ridiculous bit of attempting to have their PR cake and eat it too.