Quote:
Originally Posted by qdmcg
#1 something like this would absolutely never work. i refuse to believe having seen your other posts that you are naive enough to believe this.
Well... thh... anks? I think?
Anyhow, why wouldn't it work? Because they'd break the law and do it anyway?
Quote:
Originally Posted by qdmcg
#2 shocking that a bunch of political figures release soundbites completely misrepresenting a supreme court ruling (you know, an interpretation of whether or not a law is legal under our constitution).
I see... So they're all, collectively (both left and right), lying, or just all dumb?
Why don't you detail for us what the ruling means, and how those individuals completely have it wrong?
Quote:
Originally Posted by qdmcg
#3 you will never get fair exposure. funding, among many other traits, dictate the exposure of a candidate. Politicians have (in Presidential elections) thousands of exposure opportunities, all which rely on funds.
Once more, I'm talking about the final internationally televised, head-to-head debates before the general election. Not the entire campaign trail itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by qdmcg
#4 If you mean some sort of system where it is harder for governments to spend/borrow money, I'm all for it
I'm clearly talking about the corporate banking model of debt and expansion based on that debt and nothing tangible. Until that changes, lower Manhattan dictates to the Beltway, not the other way around.