Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
I Don't Know If Libertarians Are Right But... I Don't Know If Libertarians Are Right But...

09-07-2010 , 12:29 AM
The only guys I see on cable TV who rarely make moronic logical errors when arguing their points are Stossel and Napolitano.
09-07-2010 , 12:34 AM
watch both of them more
09-07-2010 , 12:35 AM
Well, now we know where you get your cable news.
09-07-2010 , 12:39 AM
Max,

link to either making moronic logical errors?
09-07-2010 , 12:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Well, now we know where you get your cable news.
David's preferences in news anchors are well-known, and incidental exposure to Stossel and Napolitono are unavoidable given those preferences.
09-07-2010 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
David's preferences in news anchors are well-known, and incidental exposure to Stossel and Napolitono are unavoidable given those preferences.
Well known, you say? I'm always the last one in on anything.
09-07-2010 , 12:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
Max,

link to either making moronic logical errors?
I think this is ******ed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXs7oBynYA

Or should no company ever have a boss?
09-07-2010 , 12:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
I think this is ******ed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXs7oBynYA

Or should no company ever have a boss?
Wow dude. If you think that Stossel is arguing that companies should not have bosses then I'm not sure what to say to you.

Specifically, what logical error is Stossel committing with that piece?
09-07-2010 , 12:55 AM
David Sklansky,

Low Political Content thread

Consider using it.
09-07-2010 , 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
I think this is ******ed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXs7oBynYA

Or should no company ever have a boss?
Maybe you're intentionally missing the point? Its not even Stossel's idea its a concept that economists came up with.
09-07-2010 , 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nichlemn
David Sklansky,

Low Political Content thread

Consider using it.
I think less people should use the LC thread and more should start threads like David does. Not everyone reads the LC thread and by starting a thread the idea is exposed to wider discussion.
09-07-2010 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Well known, you say? I'm always the last one in on anything.
09-07-2010 , 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
Wow dude. If you think that Stossel is arguing that companies should not have bosses then I'm not sure what to say to you.

Specifically, what logical fallacy is Stossel committing with that piece?
Hitler's world view had no "logical fallacies" and of couse neither does Stossels. You can't reduce everything to logic. Why does Stossle's argument work for governments but somehow fails for smaller groups of people?

(FWIW i think he is generally correct, there is too much control of what people do from government, but it doesnt make the ice staking argument correct)
09-07-2010 , 01:05 AM
The Stossel bit is a nice populist statement, but people need leadership. Children, who act as if they have to run free, really want someone at some time to reign them in.
09-07-2010 , 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
Hitler's world view had no "logical fallacies"
Love it.

When cornered break out a Hitler reference. That'll get the subject changed if nothing else.
09-07-2010 , 01:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
Hitler's world view had no "logical fallacies"
wat
09-07-2010 , 01:08 AM
You implied in your post that if Sklansky watched Stossel more often he would see Stossel making logical errors. Sklansky wasn't saying that Stossel was right, but that he didn't make logical errors in his arguments.
09-07-2010 , 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iron81
Ok, that one I knew about and if a certain somebody disapproves we are both going down in flames together.
09-07-2010 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
Love it.

When cornered break out a Hitler reference. That'll get the subject changed if nothing else.
Or you can try to actually read, think and respond to what I said. Yes, Stossel did not violate Modus Ponens..... but I don't think that alone makes him right
09-07-2010 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
You implied in your post that if Sklansky watched Stossel more often he would see Stossel making logical errors. Sklansky wasn't saying that Stossel was right, but that he didn't make logical errors in his arguments.
I thought that the stossel priece i posted was an obvious logical error. Or atleast something a fascist as well as an ACist would think is an error
09-07-2010 , 01:16 AM
Or you could try and read Max. Sklansky explicitly said he didn't think that Stossel was right. He just said he didn't make logical errors. You implied that Stossel did make logical errors, and Sklansky just needed to watch more of him to see them.
09-07-2010 , 01:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
I thought that the stossel priece i posted was an obvious logical error. Or atleast something a fascist as well as an ACist would think is an error
Describe the logical error Stossel was making.
09-07-2010 , 01:21 AM
By the way Napolitano seems the more impressive of the two. But I have only watched their shows maybe ten times each.
09-07-2010 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjkidd
Describe the logical error Stossel was making.
He did not make a "logical error". Neither did Jesus, Buddha ghandi hitler etc.... i thought that was clear
09-07-2010 , 01:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Raker
I think this is ******ed

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXs7oBynYA

Or should no company ever have a boss?
Stossell is my new hero just for the "What would Brian Boitano do?" line.

Also I think you misunderstood the point of the piece...

      
m