Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise + 2 cops + aides (?) reportedly shot House Majority Whip Steve Scalise + 2 cops + aides (?) reportedly shot

06-15-2017 , 10:39 AM
Most shootings are committed by men. More men are republicans than democrats. Most shootings are committed by republicans. QED.
06-15-2017 , 10:42 AM
Lol of course the answer is not gun control, it's more security for Congressmembers.


https://twitter.com/YahooNews/status/875357304010547201
06-15-2017 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dagger9
Can CNN go one day without lying?

Define "lying."
06-15-2017 , 10:43 AM
At the UPS shooting yesterday where they DIDN'T have Capitol Police on hand to personally protect them, three people ended up killed. Four if you count the suspect.


https://twitter.com/ABC/status/875059424997625856
06-15-2017 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Lol of course the answer is not gun control, it's more security for Congressmembers.
This is their go to solution for all shootings. It's amazing they're always able to find money for increased security but the cupboards are bare when poor people need healthcare or food.
06-15-2017 , 10:49 AM
Guys lets not overreact
06-15-2017 , 11:14 AM
"Mainstream press fans the flames" as they're calling it the start of a ****ing war lol.
06-15-2017 , 11:23 AM
What will they do? Before I guess the answer, are we sure Info Wars people believe the original Civil War happened? They don't have a good track record wrt major historical events
06-15-2017 , 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
"Mainstream press fans the flames" as they're calling it the start of a ****ing war lol.
Well infowars has credentials at the white house now so maybe they are referring to themselves.
06-15-2017 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dagger9
"the gun nuts voted for Trump" but 70% of shootings are done by Democrats.



sauce:
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...n-affiliation/
holy cow, this made my day.
my third-grader cousin would see that this methodology is bull**** and you actually came here and quoted that
06-15-2017 , 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
LMAO the gun nuts voted for Trump you bumpkin, and no where in the 2A does it mention well armed police. Try again.
Define gun nut.

And while you're at it, define bumpkin as it relates to someone who's spent his entire life living in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd largest urban American cities.

Lastly, if you're feeling ambitious explain why you feel it's necessary for local police forces to be so much better armed than the citizens they serve.
06-15-2017 , 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minirra
And of course, that doesn't really address the epidemic of gun violence that currently exists in the US.
I'm all for reducing guns on the streets through buy back programs or whatever. Also, common sense gun control, background checks, waiting periods, etc. Heck, I'm even fine with gun laws that limit to one revolver per household.

I'm just saying citizens should be allowed to arm themselves up to the extent that police forces can.
06-15-2017 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
"Mainstream press fans the flames" as they're calling it the start of a ****ing war lol.
It sounded to me like +Rep is ready to get it on a few posts back. It's the first time I ever found myself cheering him on.
06-15-2017 , 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
I'm all for reducing guns on the streets through buy back programs or whatever. Also, common sense gun control, background checks, waiting periods, etc. Heck, I'm even fine with gun laws that limit to one revolver per household.

I'm just saying citizens should be allowed to arm themselves up to the extent that police forces can.
Obv I'm a lol brit but this seems crazy to me. Police should have more firepower than the average citizen because they're, you know, the police. They should be on the side of good so we want them to be stronger than the bad guys. I get that the police in the US have issues let's say but surely even so if you want to balance the scales just take guns off of everyone police and civilian alike. The cops have tanks so the citizens should have bazookas? Just take the tanks off the cops.
06-15-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
Define gun nut.
You
Quote:

And while you're at it, define bumpkin as it relates to someone who's spent his entire life living in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd largest urban American cities.
You
Quote:
Lastly, if you're feeling ambitious explain why you feel it's necessary for local police forces to be so much better armed than the citizens they serve.
That's not material to a 2A argument. The 2A says nothing about what arms a well trained militia shall have.
06-15-2017 , 12:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat

I'm just saying citizens should be allowed to arm themselves up to the extent that police forces can.
LMAO
06-15-2017 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
LMAO
You laugh a lot. That's either a sign of either a very low IQ or a person with no argument and ground to stand on.
06-15-2017 , 12:07 PM
I could say the same about you and the arguments you make, but it's faster to just laugh at their stupidity.
06-15-2017 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
You
First Google listing:

Gun nut" is a term of derision that anti-gun supporters roll out when they don't have a substantive argument to make and want to belittle and dehumanize their opponents.

Quote:
You
bump·kin
ˈbəm(p)kən/Submit
nouninformal
an unsophisticated or socially awkward person from the countryside.
"she thought Tom a bit of a country bumpkin"

You're also wrong a lot.

Quote:
That's not material to a 2A argument. The 2A says nothing about what arms a well trained militia shall have.
Right because if it did, it would say muskets d'oh!

I'm not going to copy and paste the 2nd Amendment for you. It's available online if you ever want to read through it.
06-15-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
I could say the same about you and the arguments you make, but it's faster to just laugh at their stupidity.
At least I make arguments and let them be criticized. You just guffaw a lot. Wait... Isn't guffawing something a bumpkin does?
06-15-2017 , 12:28 PM
85% of the readers of this thread know your argument is complete junk and rather than debate what everyone but you already knows they just lol, which is appropriate in these situations
06-15-2017 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
Most shootings are committed by men. More men are republicans than democrats. Most shootings are committed by republicans. QED.
If you keep going you'll draw the conclusion that Chicago has a sky high density of Republicans.
06-15-2017 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
At least I make arguments and let them be criticized. You just guffaw a lot. Wait... Isn't guffawing something a bumpkin does?
Dude, your arguments don't deserve consideration they are so stupid. No where is it ever even remotely claimed that citizens should be as well armed as the police, citizens don't fight the police, criminals do. Basing your support of the 2A an that lame ass idea is ridiculous on the face of it and deserves derision so you may realize you have stupid ideas and un**** yourself. No one is holding their breath for it mind you...
06-15-2017 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
Define "lying."
Publish false news because it fits your narrative then come up with the real news.

Some more examples:









Maybe I missed your point and you're suggesting incompetence over dishonesty?
06-15-2017 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
If you keep going you'll draw the conclusion that Chicago has a sky high density of Republicans.
you realize you've never made a good post in your life and with that response, you're really just reinforcing the point that he's making

idk how much money i made shamelessly clicking it back against xr's on paired flops because of your dumb plo8 book, so tks for that at least

      
m