Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Has Liberal Media Bias Gotten Better Or Worse Since Inauguration? Has Liberal Media Bias Gotten Better Or Worse Since Inauguration?

06-29-2017 , 05:25 AM
well named, So there you go! I believed what they said on FOX without verifying. And if someone was to tell me that Obama voted some 4000 times [as quoted in your link] while in the Illinois Congress, I would have said that was impossible. I mean, does the Congress cast 4000 votes over an 8 year period?! That would be 500 a year! I would bet money they don't - without checking.........unless you were willing to take me up on the bet.........then my jaw would drop!
06-29-2017 , 05:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt
well named, So there you go! I believed what they said on FOX without verifying. And if someone was to tell me that Obama voted some 4000 times [as quoted in your link] while in the Illinois Congress, I would have said that was impossible. I mean, does the Congress cast 4000 votes over an 8 year period?! That would be 500 a year! I would bet money they don't - without checking.........unless you were willing to take me up on the bet.........then my jaw would drop!
It's gotten much worse since inauguration. Last year, I used to split my time between Fox and the normal media outlets, just to see what Republicans were up to. Yeah, they were cool to make fun of and all, but that was then.

After learning that Trump, as POTUS, was spending hours on the phone almost daily with the owner of Fox, and that his relationship was better with Murdoch than with most of Trump's family members, I stopped laughing.

As expected, they now need to be fact checked for bold-faced lies in every other sentence instead of a few exaggerations per topic.
06-29-2017 , 11:28 AM
Our House, The commentators on Bret Baier @ 6pm are not defending Trump CNN had to apologize for false Russian stories. Nobody to believe these days.
06-29-2017 , 11:42 AM
I suspect, although I am not certain, that the 4000 number includes votes that are not final up/down votes to pass legislation, but procedural votes related to how bills move through the legislative process, including through committees.
06-29-2017 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt
Our House, The commentators on Bret Baier @ 6pm are not defending Trump CNN had to apologize for false Russian stories. Nobody to believe these days.
Pathetic.
06-29-2017 , 12:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oroku$aki
Pathetic.
Exactly what Trump wants. Also exactly what Putin wants. Coincidence #2650.
06-29-2017 , 01:00 PM
These idiots must be on every politics forum on the internet. "He could be workin' at Burger King spittin on your onion rings."
06-29-2017 , 01:14 PM
"One side told me Obama was a muslim trying to take all my guns away and install sharia law in the USA while the other side got one source wrong, retracted the story and printed a correction. So much fake news out there I just don't know who to believe."

How have these people not had a paint eating mishap yet?
06-29-2017 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
"One side told me Obama was a muslim trying to take all my guns away and install sharia law in the USA while the other side got one source wrong, retracted the story and printed a correction. So much fake news out there I just don't know who to believe."

How have these people not had a paint eating mishap yet?
I'm sure some truly believe that, and some don't, but like clockwork they all feel compelled to get you on that level. They're like Mormons.
06-29-2017 , 05:10 PM
I'd argue that bias is inherently bad and so it can't get better.

You could talk about the quantity of it going up or down though. I'm under the impression that the media is becoming more polarized but I am not a regular news viewer. I stick to the Reuters app which seems to cut away a lot of the "The Sky Is Falling!" type of news that freaks people out here.
06-29-2017 , 06:20 PM
Liberal Bias has been sneaking into the WH and using Trump's phone to make him look like an idiot.
06-29-2017 , 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by simplicitus
Liberal Bias has been sneaking into the WH and using Trump's phone to make him look like an idiot.
I think it was Baron.
06-30-2017 , 10:07 AM
"What makes you think the president is colluding with Russia? He can't even collude with his own Congress." - Lindsay Graham [R] Senator SC
07-01-2017 , 05:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZuneIt
"What makes you think the president is colluding with Russia? He can't even collude with his own Congress." - Lindsay Graham [R] Senator SC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Despite everything that's almost at the breaking point, I'm genuinely surprised at the lack of concern about Russia taking over the US while Trump just sits back and lets it happen.

I understand he's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Even if he was completely unaware that people in his administration were colluding, and he was just "useful moron", that explanation doesn't hold. Once the election is done and the transition period is over, all decisions are owned by the president. And this FAKE POTUS lets Russia get away with not only skewering our 2016 election(s), but also is willfully ignoring the ongoing deception campaign, bot infiltration, fake news, future election threats, power grid vulnerability, buzzing of ships/planes, violating treaties, and nuclear power plant hacks.

Those are just examples of inactivity. He's also been aiding and abetting Putin in the Saudi/Qatar situation, destroying ties with EU allies, undermining NATO, defunding the State Department, barely leaving skeleton crews in other areas of the government, getting the House to impede the passing of new sanctions, trying to remove existing sanctions the first week or two in office, responding to threats over reopening the Russian spy compounds closed by Obama, hiring an unusually pro-Russian staff, weakening democracy and institutions in the US, going after people who make Putin jokes, and on and on...

AND ALL OF THIS FOR ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN RETURN!

Note: Everything listed above is REAL and not fake news. Right, Trumpkins? Pay attention to all of this so you can explain to your Trumpkin buddies why Russia + Trump = ****ing horrible and dangerous for us, and everyone else in the world.
There's more.
07-01-2017 , 01:57 PM
I didn't even know there was liberal media bias. That's just some **** Republicans like to say so they feel better about themselves.

Trump was a birther for almost a decade and nobody even talks about it. Instead we get Wolf hitting his fainting couch because Trump told a lie today. Breaking news: Trump is always ****ing lying and the media is full of disingenuous ratings whores.
07-01-2017 , 05:33 PM
The media tends to be biased towards centrism and neofeudalism (extreme capitalism), because it's owned by the incredibly wealthy and those are policies that tend to benefit the incredibly wealthy. This style of centrism tends to provide just enough stability to where people don't lash out too much at the system, while providing very little security for those at the bottom so they are forced to produce vast amounts of wealth for the owning class in relative peace.
07-01-2017 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
The media tends to be biased towards centrism and neofeudalism (extreme capitalism), because it's owned by the incredibly wealthy and those are policies that tend to benefit the incredibly wealthy. This style of centrism tends to provide just enough stability to where people don't lash out too much at the system, while providing very little security for those at the bottom so they are forced to produce vast amounts of wealth for the owning class in relative peace.
So it's no wonder that the conservatives see the media as liberal because they are going to side with the Centrist party (Democrats) over the Far Right party (Republicans) more often than not. And people on the left see the media as being conservative because the media's economic agenda largely fits in with the big corporations and the Right/Far Right, even though they "strongly disapprove" of the social policies of the Far Right.
07-01-2017 , 05:44 PM
The media has failed to confront the rise of the Far Right in any meaningful way because doing so would mean putting historians, academics, and intellectuals on their programs and explaining to people the actual practical implications of the rise in extremism among the Republican party.

A Dangerous New Americanism?
https://warontherocks.com/2017/04/a-...w-americanism/
Quote:
Extremism can be seen as the belief that an in-group can never be healthy and successful unless it takes negative actions against an out-group. For extremists, negative actions against the out-group are inseparable from the health of the in-group. These acts range from milder options, such as assimilation or voluntary segregation, to much more severe options, such as terrorism or genocide.

The evolution of British-Israelism highlights crucial tipping points in an identity movement’s march toward extremism:
  1. Demand for legitimacy: Identity-based movements are not always extreme. They begin by justifying the right of an in-group to exist as a collective. Movements become extreme when this healthy need for legitimacy escalates uncontrollably, like an auto-immune disorder. When this occurs, the in-group’s need for legitimacy can only be satisfied at the expense of an out-group.
  2. Escalating justifications: As the demand for legitimacy increases, extremist ideologues seek additional justifications for their demands, sometimes drawing on sources of questionable authenticity, such as apocryphal scriptures and conspiracy theories. The new justifications sometimes inspire further demands for legitimacy and as the cycle repeats, a movement spirals into extremism.
  3. Perception of threat: As a movement becomes extreme, the out-group is seen as an increasingly dangerous threat to the legitimacy or security of the in-group. As the perception of threat grows, so too does the range of “solutions” that an in-group is willing to consider for the “out-group problem.”
  4. Fluidity of groups: The definition of the “in-group” (the identity a movement seeks to support) and the “out-group” (people excluded from the movement’s support) changes over time. For Christian Identity, both the in-group and the out-group expanded (from Anglo-Saxon to “white” for the former, from Jewish to “non-white” for the latter). This dynamic differs for other groups; for instance, the self-proclaimed Islamic State has contracted its in-group while expanding its out-group. But shifts in group definition, regardless of direction, may be among the most dangerous points in the life of an identity movement. When identity is in the process of being redefined, it is more vulnerable to extremist formulations.

All of these factors are now at play in the consideration of American identity, and that should worry everyone. “American” is an identity collective, like any other. Identifying as part of a collective is not inherently bad. In many ways, it’s normal and healthy. People who live in communities seek definition, whether as a neighborhood or as a nation. But when the health of the in-group can only be obtained at the expense of an out-group, identity takes on sinister and destructive overtones.

The “American” identity is not immune to this dynamic, no matter how nobly it has been defined in the past. President Donald Trump and the “movement” he touts are steering America into the death spiral that leads to true violent extremism.

The opening salvo of his presidential campaign set the tone from the beginning, stating that “our country is in serious trouble…we don’t have victories anymore.” He then proceeded to list a number of out-groups to whom Americans were allegedly losing.”

Mexicans? “They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” The Chinese? “They kill us (on trade).” Muslims? “I think Islam hates us.”

He painted a despairing picture of America that he would repeat and escalate throughout the 2016 campaign and carry on into his presidency. His focus on “bad deals” hammered home the point that America’s weakness was inextricably linked to its attitudes about outsiders. Both the in-group and out-group are nebulous in Trump’s worldview. He arbitrarily redraws the lines whenever it is convenient and insists he is supported by the very people he is marginalizing.

This is the “fluidity of groups” that accompanies a transition to extremism. The definition of the “American” in-group is elusive and shifting. The definition of a core out-group of “immigrants” (including Muslims, Mexicans, and more) is crystallizing but still flexible. Around the edges, it is expanding—for instance, with the recent wave of anti-Semitic threats and vandalism, passively endorsed by an administration that attacks reporters for even asking about the issue.

Much of Trump’s rhetoric is framed in the context of business and competition, and here it is important to understand some of the subtleties of the definition of extremism. For a movement to be extremist, it must believe an in-group’s success is inseparable from negative acts against an out-group.

Competition does not by definition require negative acts against competitors. For instance, a sports team seeks to defeat competing teams, but it does not seek to destroy them. Similarly, most businesses define success by their own profits, rather than by the destruction of their competitors.

The Trump administration believes that America’s success can never be separated from hostile action against perpetual out-group threats.

“We either have a country or we don’t,” Trump has said on more than one occasion. “If we have a country, we have to have borders. We have borders, we have to have laws. We either have a country or we don’t, and it’s that simple.”
07-03-2017 , 04:41 PM
07-05-2017 , 11:00 AM
Our House: I quoted Graham, as it was funny when I watched it. Whatever is going on with POTUS, we'll find out during the G-20 Summit.
Russia, China & DPN wants the U.S.A. to stop military exercises with S. Korea.

I cannot, for the life of me, see how Mattis/Tillerson would be in favor of this, but we shall see.
07-06-2017 , 12:15 PM
ITS gotten much worse. I'm pretty liberal and I get annoyed hearing about trump bashing whenever I turn on cnn. I'm not a trump fan but we gotta let the it go and just acknowledge he won and is our president. If he does poorly, people need to make sure he isn't re-elected in 4 years. This all coming from a massive trump hater.
07-06-2017 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jkpoker10
ITS gotten much worse. I'm pretty liberal and I get annoyed hearing about trump bashing whenever I turn on cnn.
Why?

Quote:
I'm not a trump fan but we gotta let the it go
Why?

Quote:
and just acknowledge he won and is our president. If he does poorly,
He's already doing very poorly.

Quote:
people need to make sure he isn't re-elected in 4 years.
But in the meantime, shut up and don't complain?

Quote:
This all coming from a massive trump hater.
Therefore...the left here must really be out of line (since you're a massive Trump hater and you're not complaining)?
07-06-2017 , 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jkpoker10
ITS gotten much worse. I'm pretty liberal and I get annoyed hearing about trump bashing whenever I turn on cnn. I'm not a trump fan but we gotta let the it go and just acknowledge he won and is our president. If he does poorly, people need to make sure he isn't re-elected in 4 years. This all coming from a massive trump hater.
Doing so normalizes Trump. Normalizing Trump ensures that he can continue to step up attacks on democracy and the American people, while helping Putin destabilize the rest of the world's democratic systems and leaving him a weak and wide open America for gradually increasing takeover.

The only thing keeping Trump at the current pace is perpetual resistance. They should be commended for what they do. Same for MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, and lots of others.
07-09-2017 , 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Doing so normalizes Trump. Normalizing Trump ensures that he can continue to step up attacks on democracy and the American people, while helping Putin destabilize the rest of the world's democratic systems and leaving him a weak and wide open America for gradually increasing takeover.

The only thing keeping Trump at the current pace is perpetual resistance. They should be commended for what they do. Same for MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, and lots of others.
I don't think trump is doing a good job etc. I just get sick of hearing about it on cnn. Everyday i click to cnn.com or watch cnn, its trump bashing. It just annoys me bc i would rather hear other news. I'm going to get ripped itt regarding what i said or told not to watch cnn.


Basically if you are going to say trump colluded with russia, show me the details. I wanna stop hearing about it if there isn't concrete evidence. I can tell girls I have a 15 inch cock but if i dont show them how believable is that.
07-09-2017 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jkpoker10
I don't think trump is doing a good job etc. I just get sick of hearing about it on cnn. Everyday i click to cnn.com or watch cnn, its trump bashing. It just annoys me bc i would rather hear other news. I'm going to get ripped itt regarding what i said or told not to watch cnn.


Basically if you are going to say trump colluded with russia, show me the details. I wanna stop hearing about it if there isn't concrete evidence. I can tell girls I have a 15 inch cock but if i dont show them how believable is that.
The evidence so far is essentially
Nearly every ****ing one on trump team has a russian tie or had a russian meeting they lied about, then when caught on that said it was about X, then when caught on that, changed the story to Y, some of them were caught on that, and it's now Z.
the initial NSA (flynn) is a complete wacko who at the minimum was compromised by russia/turkey.
If you did collude with the russians and you were stupid or afraid; you'd do exactly what trump is doing. Trump is stupid, so here we are.

The problem is that trump is indeed an authoritarian anyway, so a lot of this can be explained simply b/c that's who he is too so he wants to be their BFF and lol america for electing the one thing we fought for our independence against.

      
m