Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court The Great ObamaCare Debate, Part 237: Back to Court

05-08-2014 , 01:44 AM
youre doing that thing again
05-08-2014 , 01:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neg3sd
That's not how it's done. 60 Minutes had a report on rural care. They use a nurse practitioner. She drives a large trailer within her territory. She can text and email a doctor if necessary.
Ffs
05-08-2014 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh cute marksman, more nonsensical posts from you. See the rest of the conversation if you want to know why you're wrong
It is pretty clear where you are wrong.
05-08-2014 , 02:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh cute marksman, more nonsensical posts from you. See the rest of the conversation if you want to know why you're wrong
lol
05-08-2014 , 09:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh cute marksman, more nonsensical posts from you. See the rest of the conversation if you want to know why you're wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
It is pretty clear where you are wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
lol
Thanks to markksman and goofyballer for their solid, valuable, and enlightening comments regarding the discussion ikes is referring to.

This rule:

2. Don't be a troll.

is vital in maintaining the high level discussions that make this forum interesting. Glad to see you take it seriously and wouldn't even consider trolling ikes.
05-08-2014 , 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
I mean, she still should want to avoid bankruptcy
I think the appropriate answer is that it depends. She may be able to use the threat of bankruptcy to negotiate a lesser amount owed. She almost certainly can negotiate a payment plan. Ymmv on financing costs and terms. Then there is the issue of whether or not she can discharge her debts in a chapter 7 or she'll be required to pay back her creditors a portion of what she owes in a chapter 13. Bankruptcy is a legal process and I think it is fair to say that if she goes the bankruptcy route a lawyer would be highly recommended.
05-08-2014 , 09:51 AM
So all you self-proclaimed experts on healthcare don't know that you need to be 65 to qualify for Medicare. You better have continuous health insurance from now to Medicare. Obama wants to fine anyone with any break in his healthcare insurance coverage. You better be covered while you are between jobs.
05-08-2014 , 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
youre doing that thing again
Yeah, I'm doing that thing were someone else ignores the entirety of the conversation and has been proven hopeless time and time again. I'm the problem.
05-08-2014 , 10:05 AM
you can only control what you post and it will either make the discussion better or worse. i know i know, lol schu and all.
05-08-2014 , 10:06 AM
And like fly, markksman isn't worth any actual effort.
05-08-2014 , 11:32 AM
Some feel good stories from Arkansas about people benefiting for Obamacare.

http://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/the...wFullText=true
05-08-2014 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Thanks to markksman and goofyballer for their solid, valuable, and enlightening comments regarding the discussion ikes is referring to.

This rule:

2. Don't be a troll.

is vital in maintaining the high level discussions that make this forum interesting. Glad to see you take it seriously and wouldn't even consider trolling ikes.
Spoiler:
lol
05-08-2014 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by adios
Thanks to markksman and goofyballer for their solid, valuable, and enlightening comments regarding the discussion ikes is referring to.

This rule:

2. Don't be a troll.

is vital in maintaining the high level discussions that make this forum interesting. Glad to see you take it seriously and wouldn't even consider trolling ikes.
That isnt a tiger you should pull the tail of.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neg3sd
So all you self-proclaimed experts on healthcare don't know that you need to be 65 to qualify for Medicare. You better have continuous health insurance from now to Medicare. Obama wants to fine anyone with any break in his healthcare insurance coverage. You better be covered while you are between jobs.
That is a feature not a bug.

People have thought about this already:
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-...im-unemployed/
05-08-2014 , 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Ffs
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
It is pretty clear where you are wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Spoiler:
lol
i'm sure schu will be here to chastise you at any moment.
05-08-2014 , 03:09 PM
Hi ikes
05-08-2014 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Phill]

That is a feature not a bug.

People have thought about this already:
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-...im-unemployed/
Millions of Americans are unemployed for 3 to 6 months every year. Going onto Medicaid isn't really a viable option for them.
05-08-2014 , 03:14 PM
If their income is too high for Medicaid, Obamacare is viable.

Possibly even loltastic COBRA.
05-08-2014 , 03:28 PM
Medicaid looks at current income, not yearly. I was on it for 6 months I wasn't working (2 three month chunks).
05-08-2014 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
i'm sure schu will be here to chastise you at any moment.
Hahahahaha you can't see the difference between the post you responded to and the post I responded to
05-08-2014 , 05:08 PM
No goofy I can. They're both idiotic posts though.
05-08-2014 , 05:21 PM
I feel the like the ACA is such an easy scapegoat. Corporations are using it as a scapegoat now:
http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/...ngs-scapegoat/
05-08-2014 , 05:25 PM
Now? They've been using it as a scapegoat since before it was enacted.
05-08-2014 , 05:30 PM
Companies are also massively hiking the rates they charge employees for insurance even though their overall premium hadn't gone up nearly as much. They then just pocket the difference in profit and blame Obamacare. Pretty disgusting
05-08-2014 , 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rawkfanseth
I feel the like the ACA is such an easy scapegoat. Corporations are using it as a scapegoat now:
http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/...ngs-scapegoat/
You can't make up stuff in SEC filings there has to be some basis for your words.
05-08-2014 , 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
Companies are also massively hiking the rates they charge employees for insurance even though their overall premium hadn't gone up nearly as much. They then just pocket the difference in profit and blame Obamacare. Pretty disgusting
My company is doing the same thing, just not blaming Obamacare while doing it. My plan this year went from $200 deductible to $600 deductible and the premiums went up 40%. My company also conveniently stopped showing anywhere the % of the premiums they're covering. Last year it was 2/3 this year it's ???

Next year I think we only get high deductible plans. Thanks Obama!

      
m