What goes through your head to jump from that tweet to the idea that GG supports Foust re Kazakhstan? Foust wrote an article on a completely different subject (that, at a skim, seems reasonable) and GG tweeted that it was a good article. So what?
James Dobson is a worthless ****bag, but if he ever accidentally got something right, and I said so, that hardly means I'm supporting all of his other nonsense.
What goes through your head to jump from that tweet to the idea that GG supports Foust re Kazakhstan? Foust wrote an article on a completely different subject (that, at a skim, seems reasonable) and GG tweeted that it was a good article. So what?
Journalist Fails to Properly Vet Author of Article He Read before Tweeting About it!
Klinker has established on page 1 that the magic word "until" renders a time period definite. In case you still don't get it, here's an illustrative example:
We won't release you until we do
Notice how "until" causes the duration of detention to be definite!
I'll be very surprised if there is a declaration ending the hostilities in my lifetime. For the same reason authoritarian governments maintain a "state of emergency" for decades: local politics.
The title of that article is a perfect example of why GG is a dishonest hack. By saying that Holder is justifying "executions", he is implying that Holder is talking about prisoners we have under control. But Holder's central argument is that drone strikes are only warranted when capture isn't possible and there is an immediate threat of attack.
The title of that article is a perfect example of why GG is a dishonest hack. By saying that Holder is justifying "executions", he is implying that Holder is talking about prisoners we have under control. But Holder's central argument is that drone strikes are only warranted when capture isn't possible and there is an immediate threat of attack.
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
