Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Georgia's 6th - Ossof v. Handel. Georgia's 6th - Ossof v. Handel.

06-07-2017 , 01:54 AM
He had a D by his name several times, I assume, so that's like 20 points off for him
06-07-2017 , 02:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wheatrich
Being bitter and angry and calling people liberals as a pejorative is winning optics in republican country because it's what they are now.
****. That's true.
06-07-2017 , 08:17 AM
06-07-2017 , 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
Did she say anything about hospitalizing reporters? Because that would lock up her victory.
06-07-2017 , 08:39 AM
She did get a couple of good digs in at the press.
06-07-2017 , 09:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
"PELOSI zomg" "3k miles" "San Francisco "
06-07-2017 , 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Did she say anything about hospitalizing reporters? Because that would lock up her victory.
She actually did
06-07-2017 , 09:36 AM
Wow. Obviously I didn't watch. WTF?

I was about to tell einbert that digs at the press are so 2016. This is Trump's America and we beat them up now.

This is what it's come down to, and will keep getting worse. These actions perpetuate each other. Normal education and resistance beget stronger and more impactive means of combating them. Republicans laugh and Dems vote against this nonsense. But votes may or may not count too much longer because Russia. That, and Trump really hates taking losses. One would think he'd be used to it by now.
06-07-2017 , 10:00 AM
I had no idea this debate was even happening, last I heard he had declined to debate her.
06-07-2017 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melkerson

Can someone who watched it maybe point me to Ossoff's weakest part of the debate. In all the segments I saw, I think he did very well.
Thought defending planned parenthood a lot on that one Q from the susan komen stuff to handel was a huge huge mistake. He got killed on that Q despite handel bumbling around. People are far more motivated to vote against that than for.

People usually don't remember much of what's said in these; so if that's the thing that stuck with people then he got killed in the debate.
06-07-2017 , 11:21 AM
after watching the debate, he really stands no chance to win.
06-07-2017 , 11:37 AM
It's so sad that such a small issue has such a big impact on the voting. Like Trump being pro life. He's ripping the world apart, ripping the country apart, breaking laws, pocketing unprecedented amounts of money, using democracy against itself, feeding off the poor, But...BUT...

But he MAYBE MIGHT POSSIBLY (or probably never) look into talking about proposing a change that could affect the legal status of abortion.

These people eat bags and bags of dicks.
06-07-2017 , 11:40 AM
Maybe we can stop calling it "pro-life" since that is not what the GOP is. They are simply anti-legal abortion. They don't care that their policies bring about more abortions. They just want promiscuous sluts to possibly die seeking abortions or at least be incredibly inconvenienced. The abortion rate isn't something they ever consider.
06-07-2017 , 11:52 AM
Ossoff's people are going hard with their GOTV efforts. I've been called twice this week, someone stopped by last week, and another canvasser came to my house just a few minutes ago while I was scooping my dog's ****. I have assured them all that I'm voting - they are very concerned with whether or not I'm voting early.
06-07-2017 , 12:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Maybe we can stop calling it "pro-life" since that is not what the GOP is. They are simply anti-legal abortion. They don't care that their policies bring about more abortions. They just want promiscuous sluts to possibly die seeking abortions or at least be incredibly inconvenienced. The abortion rate isn't something they ever consider.
They just call it whatever appeals to religious people who think their views are so important that others who don't even share them should have to live by them. You know, freedom of religion but not freedom from religion.
06-07-2017 , 12:32 PM
DCCC claims pro-Handel PACs are outspending Dems on this race 5 to 1
06-07-2017 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
Ossoff's people are going hard with their GOTV efforts. I've been called twice this week, someone stopped by last week, and another canvasser came to my house just a few minutes ago while I was scooping my dog's ****. I have assured them all that I'm voting - they are very concerned with whether or not I'm voting early.
Probably concerned that there will be fake line-standers on election day and people will give up and not vote or something
06-07-2017 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
Ossoff's people are going hard with their GOTV efforts. I've been called twice this week, someone stopped by last week, and another canvasser came to my house just a few minutes ago while I was scooping my dog's ****. I have assured them all that I'm voting - they are very concerned with whether or not I'm voting early.
An early vote is a vote guaranteed. Super easy to fail to get to the polls on election day. If they have decent data, they'll stop bugging you within a day or two of your vote being cast.
06-07-2017 , 01:22 PM
Oh yeah, I definitely understand why they want me to vote early. There's a good chance that I will, either tomorrow or Saturday. I've told them all that I can't promise to vote early, I can guarantee I will vote.
06-07-2017 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
DCCC claims pro-Handel PACs are outspending Dems on this race 5 to 1
This could become a problem in future elections, among other things. If Trump has already been grabbing government money with both hands and has already started making mini oligarchs out of the RNC and others, we're going to be operating at a huge disadvantage.
06-07-2017 , 01:35 PM
That's been an ongoing problem for a long time. Republicans recognized the importance of labor unions at the critical moment and dismantled them, and that's where the Democratic money used to come from. Since Citizens United we've just been walloped by ridiculous margins by deep out of state money.
06-07-2017 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
after watching the debate, he really stands no chance to win.
Explain?
06-07-2017 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
after watching the debate, he really stands no chance to win.
Your reasoning being? Based on the primary results, he pretty much has 48.5%, 49% of the vote locked up at minimum.
06-07-2017 , 05:21 PM
I think the poster might've accidentally written he instead of she
06-07-2017 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by einbert
That's been an ongoing problem for a long time. Republicans recognized the importance of labor unions at the critical moment and dismantled them, and that's where the Democratic money used to come from. Since Citizens United we've just been walloped by ridiculous margins by deep out of state money.
TeamClinton did have way more money than TeamTrump, and that still wasn't enough.

      
m