Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlelou
If you stop after the first paragraph you will be find it quite reasonable.
Its utterly absurd on a million levels.
Quote:
The people of Liberia and other countries would be better off if the US government left them alone. Leave it to private citizens to invest in African business and trade with the African people. Private investment and trade would help these countries develop thriving free-market economies capable of sustaining a modern healthcare infrastructure.
What do you think the lead time on this is? Being amazingly generous, I would say 5-7 years before the stated healthcare infrastructure would be in place. Probably a bit slow to deal with the present crises, probably.
Quote:
Firestone Tire and Rubber Company has successfully contained the spread of Ebola among 80,000 people living in Harbel, the Liberian town housing employees of Firestone's Liberian plant and their families. In March, after the wife of a Firestone employee developed Ebola symptoms, Firestone constructed its own treatment center and implemented a program of quarantine and treatment. Firestone has successfully kept the Ebola virus from spreading among its employees. As of this writing, there are only three Ebola patients at Firestone's treatment facility.
Firestone's success in containing Ebola shows that, far from justifying new state action, the Ebola crises demonstrates that individuals acting in the free market can do a better job of containing Ebola than can governments. The Ebola crisis is also another example of how US foreign aid harms the very people we are claiming to help. Limiting government at home and abroad is the best way to protect health and freedom.
If we totally accept the unstated assumption that company X protecting employees better than guberment would somehow be universal across all employers, not everyone with Ebola will be placed in the "market" in a way that allows them access to such care and resources. That is what society and extension guberment is for.