Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
If I was part of the braintrust working for Hillary, I'd suggest she literally take a stack of newspapers he's been quoted in this year up to the podium to call him out when he lies about something he's said, then memorize which one is which so you can hit him with, "No Donald, you said that on X/X/16 in the ____ Post/Times/whatever."
He denies it, she says, "Oh, really?" and pulls out the newspaper.
It wouldn't be that hard to walk him right into it. You simply have a few prepared attacks that you know will likely lead to him denying something he's been quoted as saying, and have the corresponding quote ready.
She probably won't be able to bring actual newspapers with her (debate rules typically prohibit the use of "props", and I think newspapers would fall under that), but I'm sure that she and her team have a few of those lines of attack ready to go and will be ready to spoonfeed the newspaper/tv citations to reporters after the debate.
The big question, of course, is whether that approach can be effective in a world where (a) most people just generally assume that politicians will lie/flip flop and (b) specifically when the person making the claim is Hillary.