Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Discipline in public schools Discipline in public schools

03-21-2014 , 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Haywood
This is why when I give an F for the course for using phone Wiki during an exam, the students are stunned and believe a grave injustice has been done to them and are certain all will be reversed as soon as they go to the dean. Ha.

What you describe is horrible and an example of school gutlessness. They change anything to get white parents off their back because that's who they go to church with, but expel black kids for making an alleged gang sign.

I hope you raise hell. They are cheapening your kid's genuine accomplishments. Wouldn't the National Honor society want to know about this?

When you get the "this will prevent Muffy from going to medical school" the proper response is "Good. Cheaters should not be cutting people open."

I really hate cheaters.
Yeah, this is a big issue. Anyone that is interested should google "school to prison pipeline."
03-21-2014 , 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
The real victim of the school to prison pipeline is, as you might expect, ikestoys.

Ikes what additional information would you want someone to collect before they could mention racism without bruising ikesybaby's fee-fees?
Damn it my pony slow.

Also, not shocked that Ikes jumps in to mock well-documented institutional racism in schools.
03-21-2014 , 10:59 PM
Ikes. You are right. OP did not provide a racial breakdown of his kid's school.

But why does it have to be the same school to be an issue?

I linked to a kid EXPELLED for posing in a picture his science teacher requested and making a gesture alleged to be gang related. Expelled as in kicked out of school.

You don't think whites getting a pass on cheating is a little divergent from black kids getting expelled for nothing? I can give you another link of a basketball player suspended for making the three point sign and a white kid ignored for making the exact same sign. When the black kid did it, they said it was a Bloods sign. This in frigging Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin.

I think you a racked by white guilt.

Last edited by MrWookie; 03-22-2014 at 11:31 AM.
03-21-2014 , 11:15 PM
It doesn't have to be the same school to be an issue but you asserted this school had the issue and was why they weren't punished severely. That's you making **** up
03-21-2014 , 11:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
The fact that they got no real punishment is atrocious.

I remember back in my high school days (I am old) and computers were not standard faire. My dad owned a very expensive Macintosh and a very expensive laser printer. This was back when people bought macs because of desktop publishing.

Anyways I was one of the first kids to have access to such equipment. (I had long had computers but not my own laser printer). As many classmates were still using typewriters to write reports, I was doing everything on computer. Since I enjoyed screwing around more than writing reports or studying I quickly figured out I could stretch papers just by increasing the spacing between the lines. I would let friends type papers on my dad's computer and shared this trick.

By my senior year others were getting access to computers as well. In one class that we had to write a paper for, perhaps extra credit, because for whatever reason I did not do it. Now that I think of it, the teacher hand picked the "best" students to do a special report. Well the teacher was keen to this spacing trick and by measuring he managed to catch almost every single student who turned in a paper for widening their spacing to meet the page requirements. This included the co-valedictorians and salutorian of my class. When I first started to share this I thought they might have gotten punished but now I think we all just got sternly lectured (including those of us not involved). So I guess not punishing the top students is a long standing tradition.

On the other hand this dbag physics teacher (same teacher) made a deal with the class that if your grade on the open book final was higher than your average for the semester that would be your grade for the semester. Like I mentioned I did not really care or pay attention so I had a C in the class. On the final everything clicked for some weird reason and f really did equal m a and I got the highest grade out of anyone on the final, a 97 I believe. So this meant I would get an A for the semester in the class. I guess this did not sit well with the teacher so he reneged and gave me a B instead.

Super smart bookworm nerds get caught cheating no punishment. Lazy and bored slacker crushes the final and makes a mockery of your class by learning, gets punished.

Back to the op's issue. I certainly would raise a fuss about it. The school I went to had an honor code yet everyone cheated in one way or another. I suspect at the high end of super competitive academics cheating is a bigger problem than most would guess. However the educators have a lot to lose by punishing high achieving cheaters. These are the students they are most invested in. These are the students that prove to them they are churning out bright minds. You start knocking students down for cheating and the foundation and esteem of these institutions come crashing down. Of course not realizing that doing the right thing is a much better lesson for all students involved and aware of the situation than just letting those who cheat skate because it is so very important we have those two kids be extraordinarily well versed in geography or English literature.
There is a very important socialization lesson to be learned here.

If you are high achieving people are apt to like you, think favorably of you, and treat you with leniency when necessary.

When you blatantly disrespect someone they are likely to do the opposite.
03-22-2014 , 10:52 AM
Ikes wants to believe his successes were 100% free from privilege; that his talent and intellect were the only reasons for getting where he has gotten.

Institutional racism, while being a social reality, doesn't jive with his pure self-efficacy theory.

We frequently see in the forum what happens when ones internalized, prejudicial beliefs are challenged by scientific realities: Rejection of science to ease the dissonance! It happens in thread after thread.
03-22-2014 , 11:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single

The only penalty was they had to retake the exams. Not detention, not suspension, not kicked out of anything extracurricular, not an F for the exams, absolutely nothing. I am tempted to write a letter to the school saying I am going to allow my daughter to cheat and she better not be punished or kicked out of anything if she gets caught.
See Chicagoland. All those punishments serve no purpose. Just creates another person who wont be able to function in society as an adult.
03-22-2014 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Ikes wants to believe his successes were 100% free from privilege; that his talent and intellect were the only reasons for getting where he has gotten.

Institutional racism, while being a social reality, doesn't jive with his pure self-efficacy theory.
Because winning the genetic/nurture lottery is somehow better?
03-22-2014 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeImBetter
Ikes wants to believe his successes were 100% free from privilege; that his talent and intellect were the only reasons for getting where he has gotten.

Institutional racism, while being a social reality, doesn't jive with his pure self-efficacy theory.

We frequently see in the forum what happens when ones internalized, prejudicial beliefs are challenged by scientific realities: Rejection of science to ease the dissonance! It happens in thread after thread.
1) You don't get to talk about science with any authority ITF. Go play with barbies.
2) You've done nothing but fail when you try to soul read me. You sure you want to go down that path again?
03-22-2014 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Because winning the genetic/nurture lottery is somehow better?
The correct answer is all of the above obviously. Although I would argue that genetics and environment outside of race make up a much larger portion of a persons success. I don't think that's controversial to anyone.
03-22-2014 , 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
1) You don't get to talk about science with any authority ITF. Go play with barbies.
2) You've done nothing but fail when you try to soul read me. You sure you want to go down that path again?
Spending 5 minutes on Google would lead to discovering how Barbie has gotten critical attention from psychologists and social researchers for years. Outside of a general aversion to social science I don't get why you're so fired up about Barbie.

70,000 comments is a lot of behavior to work with, and while determinations made by observing human behavior might seem mysterious and require 'soul reads' to you, there actually are methods to the madness. Again, your aversion to social science leaves you woefully disadvantaged.
03-22-2014 , 03:31 PM
Is there a thread in this forum that racism does not work it's way into?
03-22-2014 , 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single
Is there a thread in this forum that racism does not work it's way into?
Not anymore.
03-22-2014 , 04:08 PM
And, it seems, there has been no progress in the last 60 years.
03-22-2014 , 06:26 PM
Are there any other aspects of reality that you racists want other posters to never mention lest it hurt your fee-fees?

Like can we get a list stickied of the prohibited social and political influences?

Was it insensitive of the people doing this study to accurately report the results?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/21/us...education&_r=0

Won't somebody think of the old white men??!?!?!
03-22-2014 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Not anymore.
Jesus Christ. Oh how you long for the days when you could defend Jim Crow in peace and quiet, eh? Now everything is so uncouth and uncivilized.
03-22-2014 , 07:18 PM
But we denied racism! How can it still exist?
03-22-2014 , 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
And, it seems, there has been no progress in the last 60 years.
The tools to destroy racism are more widely available than ever. Look at us using some of them to insult each other!
03-22-2014 , 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Jesus Christ. Oh how you long for the days when you could defend Jim Crow in peace and quiet, eh? Now everything is so uncouth and uncivilized.
Is that what you did when you used to call yourself a libertarian? I know I never did.
03-22-2014 , 09:51 PM
Both the students that were caught cheating were white females since everyone needs to keep score. They are kind of minorities I guess. This thread was somehow hijacked by people who are obsessed with race. Since both the students that went unpunished are female we should be talking about reverse sexism and how if these students were white males what would have happened.
03-22-2014 , 09:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Is that what you did when you used to call yourself a libertarian? I know I never did.
Did you go off your meds again or something? You were posting better after the big old meltdown where essentially every reg berated you for being a huge racist while you tried your "raised by wolves" act, but it seems like were back to the same guy who whined bitterly whenever anyone brought up Ron Paul's newletters. Why do you think PB, DrM, DVaut, me, Trolly, Wookie, etc all thought you were racist, if not for your defenses of Jim Crow? Just an amazing series of guesses?

Very little whining that Ron Paul wrote the newsletters, though! Funny how that **** works. (Do you honestly think you fool anyone?)

Should grownups capable of having adult discussions about the issues of the day*, such as Bill earlier in this thread, not mention the racism problem in public school discipline in this here "Discipline in public schools" thread?

*Note this group does not include you. By choice. You have chosen to relegate yourself to the fringes.
03-22-2014 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single
Both the students that were caught cheating were white females since everyone needs to keep score. They are kind of minorities I guess. This thread was somehow hijacked by people who are obsessed with race. Since both the students that went unpunished are female we should be talking about reverse sexism and how if these students were white males what would have happened.
No disrespect meant to your OP, but the thread title touched upon a general topic that is related to racial issues and is timely. Race and discipline in public schools is getting examined from a variety of angles in recent times. News just last week ( I only caught the headline) about racial disparity with regard to public preschool suspensions.

Do you really think it is an obsession, an unhealthy need or urge? Should we stop examining the evidence? Choose not to discuss related events and outcomes?
03-22-2014 , 11:06 PM
So, is it that you are bitter towards libertarians because someone explained to you that you were actually defending Jim Crow when you were a libertarian?

As for me being the same old me, I dunno. I mean, I have an over-sensitivity to bullying, and that makes me go a little overboard defending people sometimes whether or not they deserve it, which some people might have overzealously mistook for racism if I were defending someone accused of that, but I've never said anything actually racist, and you know it. And I'm not doing that now anyway. You're just bringing it up as a distraction because I'm saying true things about what an awful poster you are.
03-22-2014 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
1) You don't get to talk about science with any authority ITF. Go play with barbies.
firetruckonfire.jpg
03-23-2014 , 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweep single
Since both the students that went unpunished are female we should be talking about reverse sexism and how if these students were white males what would have happened.
Wall Street would have showed up to offer them lucrative jobs, I'm sure.

Or do you have evidence that the same thing happened to white boys at this school and they were punished?

I'm not saying you're wrong. The justice system shows us that men get worse punishments than women for the same crime. And minorities harsher sentences than whites. I'm not sure anyone disputes this.

      
m