Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Comey in the House: A Sweat Thread Comey in the House: A Sweat Thread

06-09-2017 , 09:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggymike
This is the only post anyone should care about. Inso0's life hasn't changed due to political powers so why should he really care or be invested in it? Why he might even get a little tax break, how nice! The #1 trait that unites conservatives/Republicans in this country is not being able to give a damn about anyone else not just like them.
Liberals overwhelmingly chose the candidate who literally ran on keeping the status quo over the candidate who could actually help out the poor/downtrodden(Bernie) because they were afraid of their taxes going up. Liberals are amazing at providing lip service to the poor/minorities, but the second you tell them you are going to raise their taxes to help those groups of people out you will get attacked and defamed even worse than trump!
06-09-2017 , 09:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Indoctrination goes on in church.

EZ game
Pedophilia goes on in church.
06-09-2017 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
ITT: Anti-religion types who have absolutely no clue what goes on in most churches.

Don't worry, boys. I'll pray for you.
Hmmm, before you start telling us godless heathens what happens in "most" churches:

How many churches have you been a member of in your life?

How often do you attend services at a church where the majority of the congregation isn't white? Where the services are conducted in a language other than English?

How many times have you gone to services of a different denomination than the one you belong to (Baptist, Methodist, Anglican, Unitarian)

Do you regularly attend services in different regions of the country?

If you think that someone's ability to speak about religion comes from their personal religiosity and or how much time they spend in church, I hope you have some receipts.
06-09-2017 , 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtd353
Liberals overwhelmingly chose the candidate who literally ran on keeping the status quo over the candidate who could actually help out the poor/downtrodden(Bernie) because they were afraid of their taxes going up. Liberals are amazing at providing lip service to the poor/minorities, but the second you tell them you are going to raise their taxes to help those groups of people out you will get attacked and defamed even worse than trump!
Is this the part where it's Clinton's fault that Trump beat 18 members from the GOP to get the nominee?

And WTF is the bolded part? Liberals want taxes going to help the poor, not tax cuts for the elite.
06-09-2017 , 09:21 PM
LOL Inso.

For the 3rd time, answer my question about the ban, wall and jobs. Or admit you are a troll.
06-09-2017 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtd353
Liberals overwhelmingly chose the candidate who literally ran on keeping the status quo over the candidate who could actually help out the poor/downtrodden(Bernie) because they were afraid of their taxes going up. Liberals are amazing at providing lip service to the poor/minorities, but the second you tell them you are going to raise their taxes to help those groups of people out you will get attacked and defamed even worse than trump!

And Republicans chose someone who wants to completely **** over the poor, so you can climb down from your high horse now. How does your side manage to turn everything into massive hypocrisy? FWIW most people who post here voted for and supported Bernie (even Inso0!)

Also the tax line is just bizarre, I've never heard liberals ***** about taxes, you must be projecting again.
06-09-2017 , 09:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiggymike
And Republicans chose someone who wants to completely **** over the poor, so you can climb down from your high horse now. How does your side manage to turn everything into massive hypocrisy? FWIW most people who post here voted for and supported Bernie (even Inso0!)

Also the tax line is just bizarre, I've never heard liberals ***** about taxes, you must be projecting again.
What was the reason for not nominating Bernie, if not for taxes? I find it hard to believe he didn't get nominated because Hillary was such an amazing candidate.
06-09-2017 , 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtd353
What was the reason for not nominating Bernie, if not for taxes? I find it hard to believe he didn't get nominated because Hillary was such an amazing candidate.
The 15th Amendment
06-09-2017 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
Indoctrination goes on in church.

EZ game
And politics. Don't forget the politics.
06-09-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
ITT: Anti-religion types who have absolutely no clue what goes on in most churches.

Don't worry, boys. I'll pray for you.
The ****? What exactly do you think praying for people does?
06-09-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtd353
Liberals overwhelmingly chose the candidate who literally ran on keeping the status quo over the candidate who could actually help out the poor/downtrodden(Bernie) because they were afraid of their taxes going up. Liberals are amazing at providing lip service to the poor/minorities, but the second you tell them you are going to raise their taxes to help those groups of people out you will get attacked and defamed even worse than trump!
Wat?
06-09-2017 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
The ****? What exactly do you think praying for people does?
I'm gonna go with "makes them feel inferior because most of the people who pray for you feel the need to tell you about it" for 500 please.
06-09-2017 , 09:49 PM
Should've gone with the wink face instead of the heart.

No need to derail this into a religion thread, gents. FSM GOAT. I get it.
06-09-2017 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
What are your estimates of the probability of the following events:

1) Trump is impeached before the 2020 election.

2) Trump wins the 2020 election.

?
1 is like 1% and 2 is 0% so Rara is wrong just by not as much as most think.
06-09-2017 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Namath12
Wow I agree with this too! Of course it would have to pretty much be a lock that he was getting got before he stepped down as it was for Nixon. Otherwise I think he hangs in there like Clinton, let's the Dem-controlled House file there little Articles and the GOP senate bails him out.
For all intents and purposes, stepping down before his first term expires for any reason should be equivalent to impeachment in any of these discussions.
06-09-2017 , 10:12 PM


Look for it this summer
06-09-2017 , 10:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raradevils
Perjury is nothing now, gotcha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
JFC Gowdy is replacing Chaef****er

Yes, you do know that name from 187 BENGHAZIIIIIIIII hearings

Republicans
Fml he is the worst of the worst. We may have a huge issue with population imbalance influence in the senate there is a similar issue with backwoods rock heads holding the majority of power in the house as well. I still remember from the previous hearings and laughing at the thought Gowdy is a lawyer.
06-09-2017 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inso0
Should've gone with the wink face instead of the heart.

No need to derail this into a religion thread, gents. FSM GOAT. I get it.
For the 4th time, please answer my question. You should be able to explain in great detail since I am so frightened.

LOL Inso. Forever and always. Trump slappies gonna Trump slappy.
06-09-2017 , 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtd353
What was the reason for not nominating Bernie, if not for taxes? I find it hard to believe he didn't get nominated because Hillary was such an amazing candidate.
Taxes were part of it. There is also the self-pwnage of branding himself a socialist in America. It's not so much that socialist policies are hated, but more that the word is a scary, unfamiliar ism in America, likely to be conflated by low-info voters with communism. I also suspect Hillary being a familiar quantity helped. The two primary-winning candidates were the two most known figures in the field.
06-09-2017 , 11:21 PM
lol, Inso is gonna come in here and act all woke now? INSO? REALLY?
06-09-2017 , 11:38 PM
Any ex-employee who was fired by their boss will come off disgruntled and biased. Right or wrong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-09-2017 , 11:43 PM
particularly in writings they made months before being let go, back when their boss kept calling them to tell them what a great job they were doing
06-09-2017 , 11:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV Life

And WTF is the bolded part? Liberals want taxes going to help the poor, not tax cuts for the elite.
I was referring to how Bernie got treated in the dnc primaries. He got treated worse than trump because he wanted to raise taxes and help the poor.
06-09-2017 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by golfnutt
Any ex-employee who was fired by their boss will come off disgruntled and biased. Right or wrong.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He made all those memos and told all those people before he was an ex disgruntled anything.

Right or wrong?
06-09-2017 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
He made all those memos and told all those people before he was an ex disgruntled anything.



Right or wrong?

Not the point rally. It was his disclosing it after being fired. He comes off far too biased like anyone else would who is given the opportunity to speak about their former who boss who publicly fired them.

      
m