I think it's too nice to characterize the Bombers as 'idiots' '******s' 'stupid'. That makes them seem like 'just some kids who ****ed up'. Murdering happy townfolk at the local festival is like a whole different ball park. Goh Red Sox?
So what was their motive?
The Washington post
reports that Dhokhar Tsarnaev cited the Iraq and Afghanistan war, and also that the two of them acted alone, with no outside direction.
Cool, but that doesn't make any sense.
Why would Americanized 20yos, who are politically aware enough to understand contradictions in US foreign policy, decide to blast the carnival beer tent instead of, say, Dick Cheney? The Iraq war had been over already, and Afghanistan was supposed to be the legitimate 9/11-war, so ... what? They watched a Rachel Maddow-like expose on 'Why We Did It' and suddenly got frothy? To kill women in spandex, I still see no reason.
But what about the fact that the biggest terrorist attack since 9/11 was born directly out of our post 9/11 foreign policy? Where was the consideration of that fact when Obama was weighing his options over Syria later that year? Blowback from our anti-terrorism foreign policy is actually producing terrorism, yet we fail to acknowledge that fact in our ongoing anti-terrorism foreign policy? Hellooooooo. Maybe it is better if we just stick to threatening-sports logos.