Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
It's still functionally the same thing, and can have just as disastrous consequences, even if for some reason people think being bigoted against a race is somehow less deplorable than being bigoted against a religion.
The victims of religious bigotry, such as homosexuals, would have just cause in being 'bigoted' against the religious (imo). Whilst it's a generalization to charge every religious person with being a consistent follower of scripture (and thus necessarily homophobic), they are
enablers of gay hatred by spreading these texts as the literal word of God (despite their selective readings).
A gay person would not have just cause in being bigoted against blacks, citing something such as their disproportionate support for prop 8. People do not chose to be black nor does being black necessitate following a certain moral code antithetical to gay rights. Being religious is a choice and does necessitate an (admittedly broad) adherence to texts that if read literally are against gay rights.
There was an interesting documentary about gay Orthodox Jews and their attempt to reconcile their sexual orientation with scripture... whilst I had admiration for them, their attempts were futile and merely set the stage for further torment, not just for themselves but future gays who would be better off liberated from and actively opposed and segregated from the religion of their forefathers.
How can you justify your position that being bigoted against religion (something someone subscribes to voluntarily which defines their moral code) isn't less deplorable than being bigoted against race (a superficial involuntary attribute).