Define "over." Should be something we can quite easily test in say, 2015? How much of your political views would you be willing to renounce if you were wrong about your "over" prognostication?

You remind me of most first level thinkers I've played against.

You could live to be 500 yrs old and still not do as well as this first level thinker. Real life is not poker...learn the difference. You're chasing gut shot draws with this ass clown in office.

Also..lol at Wookie and his 10 pt infractions. Please Wookie...dont ban me...I need this forum for entertainment.

Define "over." Should be something we can quite easily test in say, 2015? How much of your political views would you be willing to renounce if you were wrong about your "over" prognostication?

Mitt Romney would obviously fire everyone to begin with so over the long run there would be more job creation. Duh.

They don't have any significant policy difference wrt to economy/job creation. I mildly prefer obama because he panders to people I find less annoying in comparison to those who romney panders to.

Ask not what the forum can do for you, but what you can do for the forum.

OK mike, here's a challenge for you. I challenge you to do one of three things. One, find a post in this forum between the dates of Jan 1 2008 and March 31 2012 that indicates that the poster thinks that his or her (who are we kidding, his) ideal president is one who will pay him a check every month for idleness rather than working a job. Two, find a promise made by Obama as a candidate or Obama as President in which he claims he wants to just give Americans (or just certain) continuous monthly checks rather than have them work for a living. Three, apologize publicly to the forum for making **** up. If you succeed in this challenge, I will wipe out every infraction point I ever gave you.

If you fail to meet any of these three challenges by Friday at noon PST, then you can get banned until Monday. If you will, you can consider it a martyrly dying and rising again.

Oh I've got a really good one!!!!

No, no you don't.

Lol..another 2 messages in the inbox.

First thing you should do is give yourself 50 infraction points for this post.
Then give yourself another 50 infraction points for actually taking me seriously about needing this forum. Lol you obama lovers...now youll have 9 people posting in this forum as opposed to 10.

Currently Active Users
43 (34 members & 9 guests)

Who needs to know how to count when you can just make stuff up as you go?

It's okay, mike will be able to spend even more time at stormfront after he gets banned from here.

I wonder if we could have a containment thread for 2p2 ban rant threads posted on white supremacist forums by banned peoples? CnP their OPs on why they perceive they were banned.

I think that would be pretty funny.

Sorry LirvA, even ignoring the irrelevance of that video, I'm not sure I can assume that you've correctly interpreted that woman's remarks.

People responding OMG2010! You're like the player who can't figure out why, after running good for a while you're running so bad now while the guy who's raising "too many" hands and playing crazy is winning.

Obama's a Trekker.

Live long and prosper

The jobs go to China because the labor is significantly cheaper, and because the government allows them to.

And no I didn't suggest the conclusion you pulled out of your ass. I said jobs should be allowed to exist, not that people should be exploited.

call for clarification - perma or temp?

I'd check for myself, but, y'know... >.>

Why are you not a mod anymore LK?

How does this conclusion not follow.

Premise 1: We have a national minimum wage.
Premise 2: China does not have a national minimum wage.
Premise 3: Our jobs are leaving to China because of p1 and p2.

Conclusion: We should NOT be more like China



You can use any rhetoric you want but that is essentially what you are saying.

Suicide by mod