Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Assange Says Hacking Wasn't Russian Gov't Assange Says Hacking Wasn't Russian Gov't
View Poll Results: Who's Telling the Truth Regarding Email Hacking?
Julian Assange
25 30.12%
CIA
58 69.88%

01-06-2017 , 03:10 PM
There is lots of evidence who did it. I posted a link, you're just parroting the dumb assange line. He also threatened to doxx every verified twitter account today, so I look forward to who defends him first on that.
01-06-2017 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
We don't know who phished Podesta's email. It was a fake googlemail, "someone has your password, click here to reset it". Despite being suspicious, Podesta still clicked on the link.

Phishing scams are super common and easy to send out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by leavesofliberty
This may be hair splitting, but phishing isn't even hacking. A child could do it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
Alright, we narrowed the culprit down to anyone over 12 years old. lol
Lots of twelve years olds go on spearphishing campaigns for 1800 accounts that include US political party officials, Ukrainian officials, military spouses and authors whose expertise is Russia.

Whacky kids! Always messing around with their dedicated geopolitical shenanigans!
01-06-2017 , 03:11 PM
Ah, so we're going with phishing scams are okay, then?
01-06-2017 , 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
13ball, Are you saying this quote is not real?

Former assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser to President Reagan has come forward confirming that William Casey did indeed say this.
Is it Barbara something? She's a 9/11 truther.

He may have said it. The source is dubious.
01-06-2017 , 03:28 PM
Also, wikileaks today was angry that the Cia leaked info about the Russia briefing to NBC. That's right, wikileaks tweeted out in opposition to leaking government information! Gee, I wonder why!

Imagine actually still supporting those frauds.
01-06-2017 , 03:30 PM
There's mountains more evidence that Russia hacked the US than there is evidence that that quote is real just lol these ****in people man
01-06-2017 , 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrModern
Ah, so we're going with phishing scams are okay, then?
in trump's america, any kind of scam that doesn't involve violent coercion is legal and socially acceptable
01-06-2017 , 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
Alright, we narrowed the culprit down to anyone over 12 years old. lol
No, we narrowed it down to the GRU, actually.
01-06-2017 , 04:47 PM
#spiritCooking
01-06-2017 , 04:49 PM
01-06-2017 , 04:56 PM
Mr. Trump also said that the hacking of emails from the D.N.C. and top campaign officials for Mrs. Clinton had revealed that she received advance notice of debate questions and “many, many other things that were horrible.”
01-06-2017 , 05:00 PM
but he hates leaks
01-06-2017 , 05:16 PM
Maybe the RNC did the hacks themselves and made it look like they were coming from Russia. #anythingispossible
01-06-2017 , 05:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
Proof? Evidence?

especially when Assange JUST TOLD US IT WAS NOT THE RUSSIANS. Wikileaks has a 100% accuracy rate so far this last decade.
Be interesting to see what happens when Assange next comes out with leaks exposing Trump-somehow I suspect people like you will be demonizing him.
01-06-2017 , 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumpley
gbv, you're GUESSING what I would do in a HYPOTHETICAL situation in an attempt to CHARACTERIZE me... quite the worthless post. You add nothing to the discussion.

How about we only demonize people who have been proven to do actions worth demonizing?


lawnmower man, so you're saying it COULD NOT have been someone impersonating the Russians?
To state the f***ing obvious, Assange has no idea who the source of his info is. The Russians obviously have the capability to route it through other sources and Assange has neither nor the capability nor likely the will to uncover that.

Only somebody reflexively partisan would make such comment.
01-06-2017 , 05:35 PM
Obviously we can't know what this previously banned poster has said or done in the last until he shows a hint of honesty and tells us what his last account was
01-06-2017 , 05:38 PM
01-06-2017 , 05:50 PM
https://twitter.com/jonathanweisman/...73618498256896

Here is the declassified report... Huge letdown as expected, nothing we didn't know already and half of it was about RT. There's actually zero evidence in this one.

However looks like 25 pages were scrubbed between classified and declassified.
01-06-2017 , 05:57 PM
What is "evidence" that can be released to the public, in your mind?
01-06-2017 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
What is "evidence" that can be released to the public, in your mind?
he wants the names of the russian officials caught celebrating made public. and if that happens to help russia's counterintelligence efforts, that's great for Tien too
01-06-2017 , 06:01 PM
Whole thing is mystifying frankly.

Did the Russians interfere? Almost certainly. They probably interfere in every election. That's what intelligence is for. The CIA does the same thing everywhere.
01-06-2017 , 06:04 PM
I'm thinking the "evidence" is in the 25 other pages that were scrubbed, like how they know which computers in Russia or "actors" uploaded data to wikileaks. That to me is strong evidence.

If they indeed scrubbed that part, and its legitimate, then fine.
01-06-2017 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreaminAsian
he wants the names of the russian officials caught celebrating made public. and if that happens to help russia's counterintelligence efforts, that's great for Tien too
I'll need a lot more than James Clapper's "take my word" for it testimony.

The Clowdstrike data had a lot more technical evidence, I was hoping there would be some technical breakdown, we got zero.
01-06-2017 , 06:07 PM
how would that help you? Are you an experienced, qualified infosec professional for whom that data would mean anything?
01-06-2017 , 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tien
I'll need a lot more than James Clapper's "take my word" for it testimony.
Participating in the briefing were James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence; John O. Brennan, the director of the C.I.A.; Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency; and James B. Comey, the director of the F.B.I.

      
m