Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Anything can be art if an artist says it is. We've known this since Duchamp.
We need to define the artist, not the art.
What I mean is, painting's status as an art form doesn't mean we have to think the guy painting a set background is an artist. But a guy doing a matte background for greenscreening could be.
You seem to agree that if creative vision is present, the work done towards realising it can constitute 'art', so we seem only to disagree about who does and doesn't have 'creative vision'.