If you're given an order as a soldier and you don't follow it because you interpret one of those bull**** slogans as infringed, you should be shot.
Soldiers have absolutely zero business forming political orders. You have an oath to your country and constitution, if you don't feel that is enough, maybe you should go get unlost on your way to McDonalds. Talk about something contrary to the Founding Ideals.
Cops, Meh. Lower standard. They get guns to murder with impunity, and I guess they like to pretend they aren't Big Brother.
Wow, after working with tyrants and nutcases for most of my lifetime, you've become hands down the most tyrannical fascist I've ever heard.
To state that you would stand behind any soldier completing any of those orders is physically disgusting to me.
People like you are the reason for the tyrannical nanny state we're in.
There is no way any Oathkeeper could be a police officer if he refused to conduct "warrantless searches". Warrantless searches, such as those incident to arrest, happen like every day.
Also,
Quote:
Orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.
Forrest fires and hurricanes are likely just NWO false flag attacks!
There is no way any Oathkeeper could be a police officer if he refused to conduct "warrantless searches". Warrantless searches, such as those incident to arrest, happen like every day.
Yea, except we really have no issue following established SCOTUS precedent.
To your second point, massive troll points given for your ability to completely ignore the operative phrase, "Martial Law", and instead pretend that "state of emergency" was being used to describe red cross workers handing out clothes rather than the proper context of armed soldiers wandering the streets in packs, which is what was meant by the phrase.
Honestly I have no Earthly idea why the phrase was put there, other than the fact that under normal circumstances military personnel aren't sent to "maintain order" during a "state of emergency" and "state of emergency" rather than "Martial Law" (the correct term) is how it would likely be described to deploying military members.
If you're given an order as a soldier and you don't follow it because you interpret one of those bull**** slogans as infringed, you should be shot.
Soldiers have absolutely zero business forming political orders. You have an oath to your country and constitution, if you don't feel that is enough, maybe you should go get unlost on your way to McDonalds. Talk about something contrary to the Founding Ideals.
Cops, Meh. Lower standard. They get guns to murder with impunity, and I guess they like to pretend they aren't Big Brother.
You might want to familiarize yourself with the military before embarrassing yourself further.
They still do electrotherapy and yes it is effective. But not in a school without consent. WTF is this story??
Yeah, they also use anesthesia when conducting applying the shocks. It doesn't even look like they were applying the shock to the head, which is the purpose of electroconvulsive therapy. It's supposed to induce a seizure, not whatever hell that kid was going through.
Yea, except we really have no issue following established SCOTUS precedent.
1) Japanese internment camps were repeatedly found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States. Those decisions have never been overturned.
2) Uh, they are still warrantless searches. So you'll refuse to perform some warrantless searches but not others? How does an Oathkeeper know which warrantless searches are allowed?
Quote:
To your second point, massive troll points given for your ability to completely ignore the operative phrase, "Martial Law", and instead pretend that "state of emergency" was being used to describe red cross workers handing out clothes rather than the proper context of armed soldiers wandering the streets in packs, which is what was meant by the phrase.
Honestly I have no Earthly idea why the phrase was put there, other than the fact that under normal circumstances military personnel aren't sent to "maintain order" during a "state of emergency" and "state of emergency" rather than "Martial Law" (the correct term) is how it would likely be described to deploying military members.
Dude, it seems like your heart is in the right place, but Stewart Rhodes is a dip****(and comes from a long line of cookie cutter interchangable and eminently predictable dip****s) and you should stop listening to him. The Oaths weren't written on stone tablets in Hebrew and so it's understandable that some of them would use the wrong words or be unclear, he wrote them like 3 years ago.
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
