Reuters is being awfully hasty. How do they know those aren't Chinese planes taking off with American pilots masquerading as ISIS fighters after the Saudis bought the airfield?

Near sure Anderson Cooper pointed this out last night.

Bombing ISIS = yawn.

Thanks of reminding of an even better example. Proves my point even better that we are capable of anything.

Gulf of Tonkin clearly led to an increase in U.S. activities in Vietnam under false pretenses including what I would argue were war crimes. Agent Orange. Total disregard for civilian casualties. What about that isn't relevant?

How about when Trudeau says there are continuing questions about who is really responsible?

How about you link to what he said.

Since I'm not an immensely ill-informed local crazy person, I didn't need a ****ing example from history to conceive of the concept of "a lie".

The question isn't "could American authorities be lying", the question is "are they", and your attempt at an alternative theory here involves BASHAR ASSAD being in on the conspiracy against himself.

I will apologize for being out of the loop a bit - it looks like he is now 100% on board with blaming Assad.

http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017...-tells-commons

That was not his position earlier Thursday. It looks like once he was told the U.S. was going to go ahead and strike anyway (one hour before they did) without doing a full investigation that he decided it better to play along.

**** you, stop calling me crazy. *******.

My alternative theory does not involve Assad being in a conspiracy against himself, what the ****?

This is your theory, and it is absolutely ****ing bonkers.

Rogue Syrian airforce people, planted by the CIA, did it and for some reason the non-rogue Syrians are covering that up.

Ok, where in that does it say that Assad is working against himself?

Where does it say that non-rogue Syrians (who?) are covering it up?

Uh, this **** happened several days ago. You can't just get ****ing Sarin gas out of the depot, load up a plane, and fly back without anyone noticing. If that is what had happened, Assad would be parading the unmasked foreign traitors down main street for a show trial. If he can't figure out who they are, he'd say exactly your story! He has access to state run media, he could say "I learned of this tragedy with all of you and I pledge to find the people responsible".
Instead, this,


We're not taking America's version of the story at face value. We're critically evaluating all possible options, and "Assad gassed his people, again, because he's a ****ing monster" is the only explanation that is supported by the facts. Your version makes no ****ing sense! Hope this helps you get called crazy less often in the days and weeks to come.

So here's how crazy you are: you're running crazier fan fiction PR for a dictator than the people who are actually on that guy's payroll. Good work, dude, definitely keep patronizing us from that soapbox

Not to derail too much--theballer, who do you believe is responsible for the 9/11 attacks? Sandy Hook?

why would the syrian president gas his own people 3 days after being told that he will still be in place and the rebels are on their heels, 99% sure its a last ditch attempt by turkey to keeps this pointless war going and keep the usa in the war

from reddit

Rebels captured with Sarin at Turkish border:
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/exp...=238&nid=48064
And again rebels captured with Sarin:
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/un-...=238&nid=47985
Because the Turkish government was planning on staging a false flag attack to justify intervention in Syria:
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/turkey-youtube-ban/
Turkish Whistleblowers Corroborate Story On False Flag Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/...tack-in-syria/
And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

I mean a general boots on the ground offensive against the Russian backed Syrian government, not the current situation of having special forces advisors helping some of the rebels.

Man, I'm on mobile, so it's too hard to do, but can someone please post the rainbow for:

"To top it all off, the Syrian Army already denied responsibility."

And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

And to top it all off, the Syrian Army has already denied any responsibility to using chemical

The Turkey supplies al-Nusra with sarin theory was pushed for the 2013 attack. There's loads of articles arguing both sides, encourage people to go off and read them. In my opinion the evidence for any non state forces possessing the materials is suspect, and that doesn't begin to address how they would weaponise and deliver it, but no need to take my word for anything.

Slow pony?



Money well spent.

He doesn't think of them as 'his people'.

Malcolm Nance (retired Naval officer, anti-terrorism) was interviewed last night on MSNBC. He said, among other things, that the U.S. gov had superior satellite observation tech all the way back in the Cold War than the highest resolution available on Google Earth right now. Accordingly, American intel will have ~every aspect of Syrian forces mapped out, all the bunkers etc.

so when the U.S. reports It then seems unlikely the U.S. would be wrong in their assessment of the radar data. They would probably need to be purposely lying (a conspiracy) to report as they did if it were not true.

edit: link to interview

Beautiful. Thank you, sir.

I didn't call you an imbecile. I implied you share the insight and understanding of the imbeciles who are espousing the same ridiculous nonsense you are.

Just because a conspiracy existed in the past doesn't mean any ridiculous conspiracy you can dream up has validity. Because if that is your stance you are ostensibly a sandy hook truther.

You still have to do the work if you choose to back the absolutely least likely scenario.