Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2016 Bold Electoral College Predictions Thread 2016 Bold Electoral College Predictions Thread

05-24-2016 , 03:01 PM
Moving IA to likely D, removing NH likely D, and adding NC to likely R changes my above total to 226-206. Adding MI and NV is 248 D.

Conclusion: uphill climb for the Rs
05-24-2016 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
demographics does not equal race
What would it take to turn blue states red?
05-24-2016 , 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeflonDawg
These are fun, but probably too simplistic. White people in Vermont and white people in Alabama don't really nice in unison.
05-24-2016 , 07:12 PM
Not out of the question that Missouri is at least a sweat. Only poll out on the subject had Trump +5 two months ago, and McCain only won it by .1%. Then again, '16 Dem primary turnout was abysmal.
05-24-2016 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shuffle
Wisconsin and Iowa are locks for the Dems, not tossups.

Similarly, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina are locks for the Republicans.
How are you defining a "lock"? What odds would you give that at least one of these states goes in the opposite direction of your prediction?
05-25-2016 , 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biesterfield
Does this seem right for the remainder:

Likely D:
CO 9
WI 10
NH 4

Likely R:
AZ 11
GA 16

That is 224 D and 191 R

Toss-ups:
IA 6
NV 6
MI 16
OH 18
PA 20
VA 13
NC 15
FL 29
Lean D:
CO 9
WI 10
NV 6
MI 16

Lean R:
AZ 11
GA 16
NC 15

Toss-ups:
IA 6
OH 18
PA 20
VA 13
NH 4
FL 29

IMO
05-25-2016 , 07:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2OutsNoProb
Not out of the question that Missouri is at least a sweat. Only poll out on the subject had Trump +5 two months ago, and McCain only won it by .1%. Then again, '16 Dem primary turnout was abysmal.
Missouri's only a sweat if Clinton is pushing 400+ EVs.

Honestly, I think she'd flip AZ and GA first before MO.
05-25-2016 , 08:43 AM
NC is not a lock for the Republicans. People are going to turn out in droves to vote out McCrory, etc.--it will hurt Trump a decent amount there.
05-25-2016 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstark
NC is not a lock for the Republicans. People are going to turn out in droves to vote out McCrory, etc.--it will hurt Trump a decent amount there.
McCrory is inept. He's polled in a statistical tie several times now. NC definitely winnable for D's.
05-30-2016 , 04:21 AM
Best case scenario for Hillary

05-30-2016 , 04:43 AM
Really curious how you decided her best case scenario would be the 2012 map with a red Maine
05-30-2016 , 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 425kid
Really curious how you decided her best case scenario would be the 2012 map with a red Maine
Yes, this.
05-30-2016 , 10:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by w00t
I just can't see NV or MI as a toss up.

Trump is despised in Nevada Clark County. Sheldon Adelson might win a popularity contest against Trump.
FYP.

The rest of the state is reliably red. Adelson didn't buy the Review Journal for the hell of it, he wants to sway public opinion to things he wants...
05-30-2016 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 425kid
Really curious how you decided her best case scenario would be the 2012 map with a red Maine
And what would be your best case scenario ?

2016 is the new 2012 minus Maine .
05-30-2016 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by awval999
Yes, this.
And your difference/complaint would be ?
05-30-2016 , 02:16 PM
pretty sure w00t saw "ME" and thought it was asking who he personally was voting for
05-30-2016 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
FYP.

The rest of the state is reliably red.
You're correct, the parts of the state where no people live are quite Republican.

This weird thing conservatives do where they think it's not fair that square miles don't get electoral votes is always adorable
05-30-2016 , 02:19 PM
Best case for Hillary has North Carolina blue and prob more.
05-30-2016 , 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by miajag
You're correct, the parts of the state where no people live are quite Republican.

This weird thing conservatives do where they think it's not fair that square miles don't get electoral votes is always adorable
Huh? Who said that?
05-30-2016 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASJayhawk
Huh? Who said that?
He's saying your post didn't mean anything because 80% of the population is in Clark County so who gives a **** how the rest of the state votes?
05-30-2016 , 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
He's saying your post didn't mean anything because 80% of the population is in Clark County so who gives a **** how the rest of the state votes?
The point was that the guy who pledged 100 million to Trump also purchased the newspaper in Clark county.
05-30-2016 , 05:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by miajag
pretty sure w00t saw "ME" and thought it was asking who he personally was voting for
You must be able to do better than that, cause that was lamo.
05-30-2016 , 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by miajag
pretty sure w00t saw "ME" and thought it was asking who he personally was voting for
Quote:
Originally Posted by w00t
You must be able to do better than that, cause that was lamo.
Disagree. That was solid and your not finding the humor reflects worse on you than thinking Trump can win ME.
05-30-2016 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
than thinking Trump can win ME.
Trump is a shoo in to get at least one electoral vote out of Maine, and yes could win 3 out of 4 of the electoral votes.
05-30-2016 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by w00t
Trump is a shoo in to get at least one electoral vote out of Maine, and yes could win 3 out of 4 of the electoral votes.
No Republican had gotten an electoral vote from Maine since 1988... But ok...

You're arguing with someone who voted for Trump in the primary...
But when you're wrong you are wrong.

      
m