NBA 2016-17 regular season picks, discussion etc. - Page 26 - Sports Betting

Classic case of overthinking, idk why I even looked at 1st Q anything, haven't bet em all season, and it was against my initial like of the over.

Def didn't see all this small ball lineups BS going on tho. Pop kinda like Belichick sometimes as far as unpredictability. Gotta love it if you have the over though.

Quote

05-20-2017 , 09:45 PM

#627

DisGunBGud

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 23,708

Took Spurs 1q online. Tried to get a little action in SE unsuccessfully

Figured get out quick win or lose

Quote

05-20-2017 , 10:25 PM

#628

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

I'm in on both 2nd H lines hah I don't even wanna watch til last half of 4th Q

Quote

05-20-2017 , 11:32 PM

#629

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

2nd H Over hits by 4 pts, GS 2nd H loses by 1 pt hah sht.

Quote

05-20-2017 , 11:33 PM

#630

OMGmartingale

grinder

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 440

2017 WCF and ECF

Quote

05-20-2017 , 11:38 PM

#631

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

1 ****ing FT or bucket of any kind and I have a big night ugh, good job playing the final possessions like it was the 1st Q Spurs backups.

Took so much to get me to bet against my team too, guess that's what I get.

Last edited by ProfBets; 05-20-2017 at 11:45 PM.

Quote

05-20-2017 , 11:46 PM

#632

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Quote:

Originally Posted by OMGmartingale

2017 WCF and ECF

Seriously. Is it just me or does it *** with ur whole thought process with the favorites hitting this often? Certainly they can't do it again etc etc

Quote

05-21-2017 , 12:38 AM

#633

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

3 for 3 tonight.

+24 units

Didn't watch most of the game. Just saw the last minute of half and last 2 min of game.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 11:23 AM

#634

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

Meh, can't stop from betting.

Took the over
And then I teased 4 pts for Cavs and Over.

I think 6 units total. I don't have a good feel for the game. Spreads and overs are tough. Just kinda gambling

Quote

05-21-2017 , 01:33 PM

#635

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackitos

Meh, can't stop from betting.

Took the over
And then I teased 4 pts for Cavs and Over.

I think 6 units total. I don't have a good feel for the game. Spreads and overs are tough. Just kinda gambling

if anything Unders have been hitting a ton on close out games. I have some more info to dig up about that and when IT was out for BOS, will be back later with what I find.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 01:52 PM

#636

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

Would be interesting to read, but bets are placed. Gotta lie in that bed now.

Did small bets though. Small ish.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 06:15 PM

#637

fansrajoke

adept

Join Date: Mar 2015 Posts: 1,182

Hey guys, celtics +16 seems like a good bet tonight?

Quote

05-21-2017 , 07:36 PM

#638

OMGmartingale

grinder

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by fansrajoke

Hey guys, celtics +16 seems like a good bet tonight?

does it?

Quote

05-21-2017 , 07:53 PM

#639

fansrajoke

adept

Join Date: Mar 2015 Posts: 1,182

Lol I think so. The under 216 looks good too. But I like celtics +16 better.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 07:56 PM

#640

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackitos

Would be interesting to read, but bets are placed. Gotta lie in that bed now.

Did small bets though. Small ish.

Something that is promising is that the point totals were even higher @ CLE in the reg season matchups, it went to 250 and 242 pts, of course both games with IT tho.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 07:57 PM

#641

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProfBets

Something that is promising is that the point totals were even higher @ CLE in the reg season matchups, it went to 250 and 242 pts, of course both games with IT tho.

We gon do this and do it hard. Maybe

Quote

05-21-2017 , 08:01 PM

#642

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

No real patterns in the games IT has been out, small sample size too but BOS is 2-4 ATS and 3-3 O/U in the 6 games he was out in the regular season.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 08:11 PM

#643

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Don't put anything more then a very small amount on this cuz it's a long shot most of the time, but 3 of the 6 first plays of the game when IT was out was either a 3pt or FT. 3pt pays +450 and FT +750 on the site I'm at.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 08:28 PM

#644

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Think like Marcus Smart U12.5 pts scored. Yes I know he's starting, but if you've ever played fantasy with him or focused on his stats he's not much of a scorer, but all around defensive presence, rebound, and assist guy. It would be Under 5 of 6 teams between these teams and hasn't topped 9 points even in the past several games, and he usually plays a good 30 mins+ even off the bench.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 08:36 PM

#645

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

Pretty not excited about the unders for Boston starters. Because no IT, someone has to score. I should have looked at the props

Quote

05-21-2017 , 08:36 PM

#646

Jackitos

srs biz

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 17,561

Missed them all anyways. Lost track of time

GL all!

Quote

05-21-2017 , 09:45 PM

#647

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

still like the 2nd H pts total, it's been 121 and 113 pts in 2nd H in the playoffs so far even in garbage time and was 131, 117 pts in 2nd H at home earlier during reg season.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 09:49 PM

#648

OMGmartingale

grinder

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 440

Quote:

Originally Posted by fansrajoke

Lol I think so. The under 216 looks good too. But I like celtics +16 better.

Hit it again at +240 at half.

Quote

05-21-2017 , 10:07 PM

#649

ProfBets

old hand

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,976

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackitos

Pretty not excited about the unders for Boston starters. Because no IT, someone has to score. I should have looked at the props

Yea Horford, Bradley and Smart's useage goes up obv with IT out.

Wow why did I pick Smart when he's shooting 75% on 3s though, that's just unlucky. He's a terrible 3 pt shooter on avg; 28% this season usually doesn't even take them.

***Right after I posted that he hit another 3 lol dicck