Thx for the replies guys, it is much appreciated!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HailLucifer
Seems like a pretty easy call to me
[QUOTE=spiritrockv2;46474232]Not sure if I like check jamming. I think villain would feel like u would d/barell your fds, I would assume you are betting all qx on the turn to (this may be wrong) so I don't think c/r the river works enough if villain can hand read, you said he was decent post-so I don't think he folds a pair bvb in that spot.
as played I think its a c/c
what did you make of his pot sized bet on river?[/QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nash_equilibria
With villain's pot bet, I don't think you're getting enough fold equity to jam. If I was the villain needing 34% equity vs. your jam, I would call with less than 2-pair such as any Q. You also need the same ~33% probability of having the best hand with a 10-A, so after looking at his river betting stats, I'm leaning towards calling.
Seems like the majority of the opinions advocate a call. In hindsight, I do believe his river sizing polarizes his range, thus making it a trivial call. When played though, I thought he was value oriented (thus reducing my options to folding or shoving, imo).
Quote:
Originally Posted by worried
I like it
Pokersnowie indicates that it is a shove 100% of the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keybattle
To those who vote for call, By calling here, what hands we actually beat?
In retrospect, I do think he is polarized on the river. Meaning he would of had to float the flop with broadways like KJ, AJ, K9 etc. that become a gutter/OE OTT and missed the river.
Quote:
Originally Posted by woolly
would be okay with x jamming against a reg but not too pleased doing it against a fish.
i also prefer to xc this flop against most villains, including this one.
Yeah, I folded the river but would of shoved vs a reg. I elected to bet flop vs this specific villain, but would of checked vs a reg.