PokerStars - $0.25 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com

BTN: 100 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 9)
Hero (SB): 204.2 BB
BB: 100 BB (VPIP: 28.36, PFR: 20.90, 3Bet Preflop: 14.29, Hands: 70)
UTG: 127.72 BB (VPIP: 10.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 11)
MP: 184.12 BB (VPIP: 20.99, PFR: 14.81, 3Bet Preflop: 3.45, Hands: 88)
CO: 268.8 BB (VPIP: 17.41, PFR: 13.84, 3Bet Preflop: 4.88, Hands: 232)

Hero posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has Ad Kc
fold, fold, CO raises to 2.48 BB, fold, Hero raises to 10 BB, fold, CO calls 7.52 BB

Flop : (21 BB, 2 players) Kh 3d Kd
Hero bets 12.04 BB, CO calls 12.04 BB

Turn : (45.08 BB, 2 players) 5s
Hero bets 25.84 BB, CO calls 25.84 BB

River : (96.76 BB, 2 players) 8h
Hero checks, CO bets 220.92 BB and is all-in, fold

CO wins 92.4 BB

I don't really expect these stats to be bluffing very often tbh. Guessing he'll just roll over 33 every time even though it's dumb to bet that size otr vs your overall range. Could level yourself into thinking you've induced but it's likely a losing strat long term vs these nitregs.

Reasons for c/f instead of betting river?

I checked the river thinking he would either value bet a worse king or bluff with missed flush draws, etc. Just didn't expect the shove. Obviously would have called a smaller bet.

I think after checking riv, u induce too many bluffs not to call. And I still wouldn't be surprised seeing a KQ shove there.