~~~ ONGAME 2011 OFFICIAL BONA FIDE REGS THREAD ~~~

[WAtR]

Originally Posted by nakke

Style shouldn't have anything to do with it. Essence is player vs player-dependant, right? Meaning you probably table select "worse" (play vs more winners) than him. (All other things being equal, obviously could just be you've won less during the 90 (or whatever it was) day period it uses as a basis.)

Ah I wasn't sure if they took the account amount of rake contributed to the pot by each player. If not then I guess play style does not matter.

[nakke]

This was some example table they posted about it. Obviously the numbers aren't this extreme in reality.

[jackie nguyen]

what's happenin ?

huge load of 200nl tbls but like literally 4 100nl 5max.. buncha 3max

prolly because of the bug that no empty 5max tbls are loading... that on purpose by ongame?

[WAtR]

Just played my first sessions at 200NL 5-max. The regs seemed a lot nittier than I expected - significantly more so than 100NL. Obviously only one session, so "lol sample size", but do people who have played both find 200NL a big skill jump? It also seemed a little harder to locate fish...

[DaMachine]

Originally Posted by jackie nguyen

what's happenin ?

huge load of 200nl tbls but like literally 4 100nl 5max.. buncha 3max

prolly because of the bug that no empty 5max tbls are loading... that on purpose by ongame?

Yeah, impossible to open a 5max table at nl100 today.

I enjoyed plaing 3 max though.

Seems like there are more fishs in 3 max...

[DaMachine]

Originally Posted by WAtR

Just played my first sessions at 200NL 5-max. The regs seemed a lot nittier than I expected - significantly more so than 100NL. Obviously only one session, so "lol sample size", but do people who have played both find 200NL a big skill jump? It also seemed a little harder to locate fish...

Havent played at nl200 at ongame. But GL at nl200 anyway!

[cwp]

Does anybody know why there are only five NL100 5 max tables at the moment and not a single empty one. There is plenty of 3 max or NL200?

[DaMachine]

Probably a bug. Was like this the whole day!

[nakke]

Originally Posted by WAtR

Just played my first sessions at 200NL 5-max. The regs seemed a lot nittier than I expected - significantly more so than 100NL. Obviously only one session, so "lol sample size", but do people who have played both find 200NL a big skill jump? It also seemed a little harder to locate fish...

Moving up to nl200 myself atm, and well.. it seems a lot more aggro? Maybe I'm just overleveling myself.. I did play nl200 for a long while before I had to stop playing as much and moved down to nl100 because of civil service, and the difference wasn't that big then imo. But the few thousand hands I've played it now, seems like I'm put into much more hard decisions, constantly getting 4bet and so on. Hopefully just lol sample size.

[dirtylobster]

Civil service ftw.

[KeyGrip510]

if you want to locate fish, just go on the games that all the super nit regs are playing

[DaMachine]

5 max tables are back at nl100!

[WAtR]

Originally Posted by nakke

Moving up to nl200 myself atm, and well.. it seems a lot more aggro? Maybe I'm just overleveling myself.. I did play nl200 for a long while before I had to stop playing as much and moved down to nl100 because of civil service, and the difference wasn't that big then imo. But the few thousand hands I've played it now, seems like I'm put into much more hard decisions, constantly getting 4bet and so on. Hopefully just lol sample size.

Played a second session - it was really weird. Started out nitty like before then, for around 500 hands, it just went super agro. Tons of 4/5 bet shoving pre, massive shoves on the flop after squeezes, tons of check raising on the flop. I adjusted quite badly and slowly to it I think, I should have just tightened up rather try to out agro everyone. Then it all went quiet again and was nit-tastic once more.

[vrs]

Originally Posted by WAtR

Played a second session - it was really weird. Started out nitty like before then, for around 500 hands, it just went super agro. Tons of 4/5 bet shoving pre, massive shoves on the flop after squeezes, tons of check raising on the flop. I adjusted quite badly and slowly to it I think, I should have just tightened up rather try to out agro everyone. Then it all went quiet again and was nit-tastic once more.

This is probably because nl200 regpool is full of tilt-tards, including me.

[littletrix]

Originally Posted by WAtR

Just played my first sessions at 200NL 5-max. The regs seemed a lot nittier than I expected - significantly more so than 100NL. Obviously only one session, so "lol sample size", but do people who have played both find 200NL a big skill jump? It also seemed a little harder to locate fish...

I've played both and 200nl is tougher. Ive found there to be less fish and more solid regs, but still some good spots I you can find them, just not as many as 100nl