nah, playing party, but the thing is, Jon's SN has been posted about six times in the last page

2013 =/= 2016

Is partypoker good? Less regs, more recs? I played on 888 a bit but even 200nl tables were breaking all the time, so frustrating..

when i asked about partypoker zoom here i was told to stay away which prolly means that its fishy as hell.

party is much much tougher than stars and we definitely don't need any more people with a pulse thankyou very much

Is there a worse grimmer than michasia on stars? Because according to stars support he is doing nothing wrong by grimming table starters 24/7.

So... you like playing dead people?

yeah, they tend to spaz... not much to do with money in the afterlife

Hey-ho, another suspect guys:

Doesnt look suspect 1 sec. :/

location, location, location.

if belarus, russia, or ukraine is a bot. stats irrelevant.

Anyone interested in DFS (specifically premier league) hit me up, trying to get a skype group set up. It's unreal fun if you actually follow football anyway, no idea if it's possible to be a winner yet but some people do seem to be completely clueless.

I thought about it as well but he regged to uk and i assume hes good, v low table count and insane heat

dfs is cancer. If u dont take it seriously ur gonna lose money and if u do take it seriously ur gonna spend half a day gathering intel and still having to wait till the game begins to see if someone is injured or not. Esp. bad if u live in a bad timezone. I managed to be profitable in low stakes nba cash (atleast i think cuz dunno how big the variance actually is), but then decided to quit, since it became really boring, dull and time consuming and i had to stay up till 4am sometimes, although i love nba. I dont think dfs is gonna stay profitable for long (unless major boom in europe then maybe for a a short time, unless ur vpning usa sites now), because information is free, calculators are cheap/free (u can also make ur own calculators pretty easily),rake is high and edges are way smaller than in poker.

Yeah I basically agree with that, rake is far too high for it to be long term profitable (10% as far as I can tell).
That said, it is really really fun!

.

Sorry I have to delete this it's a 2+2 policy. Ponty

Stian <3

ExpressVPN was fine when I used it

Got a ridiculous slowroll from Mr.Spewy. Guy goes into the tank on the river with straight flush vs my nut flush and types something obnoxious in chat. I thought we were all friends

is that his sn too? guy from czech republic? he's terrible.

Yep, angry young man.

Anyone got a hit in the sunday million? The FT looked "solid".

heh played some hands with a.urli z200 a couple years ago, pretty sick grats

remember a.uril from 200z /500z too, was a really loose lag.
funny that he said he need 900k during deal as he own 1m in debt.

also may as well say but re: the guy who posted strat about what solvers say to do

he's very right that one way to detect bots is they play differently than humans do to non std bet sizing because of how they are programmed. don't rly wanna say too specific for multiple reasons but it's pretty intuitive and some mentioned in the thread already.

however he seems to either wrongly assume, or poorly explain when talking about the other thing which is of course humans can play non gto (very few play solver style, esp at 200 and below, and many incl those who study solvers will do other strats - basically exploiting)
seemed to imply "humans would never do x cause solvers say not to do that!"

very poor examples were given, which didn't help his case for those who didn't agree and induced some trolling.. a few things that bots currently do are rarely if ever done by humans tho. bots can also learn to improve (and they will) to be less detectable/play better/improve winrate etc.

how I feel after every session this month



don't worry graph will follow at the end of month