Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** *** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread ***

01-08-2016 , 06:09 PM
just sne yes
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-08-2016 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calm Down
in


edit. i thought sn and sne were still 40% this year? is it just sne?
Sne is 45, sn 200k+ is 30,

Next year max for everybody is 30. Kinda funny that i havent played a hand on stars in 3 months and know moar about teh changes than half teh current reg pool
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-09-2016 , 06:00 AM
lol
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-11-2016 , 05:52 AM
Why does keeping SN even matter?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-11-2016 , 09:54 AM
Don't think it does matter but you're going to be wanting to play more than 100k VPP in 2016 if poker is your sole source of income.
Ridiculous that there's no increased multiplier to the number of Starscoin(s!) you earn for being SN though.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-11-2016 , 12:42 PM
being SN has no added value as far as i can tell.

also, i cant believe numbers appear to be about the same. especially zoom. jesus christ pros just love to play poker i guess.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-12-2016 , 11:52 AM
why is there supernova then? seriously we have zero advantage?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-13-2016 , 09:52 AM
Cuz stars say FU thats why
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-14-2016 , 10:56 AM
.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-14-2016 , 11:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaomai888
being SN has no added value as far as i can tell.

also, i cant believe numbers appear to be about the same. especially zoom. jesus christ pros just love to play poker i guess.
Stop questioning a good thing. Zoom regs want to play zoom, just let it be. Better that than invite them to play reg tables
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-15-2016 , 01:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hurtNCYDE
Stop questioning a good thing. Zoom regs want to play zoom, just let it be. Better that than invite them to play reg tables
lol your post doesn't help your cause.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-15-2016 , 01:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TR7isBetterThanU
lol your post doesn't help your cause.
lol everyone knows bots can't read
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-15-2016 , 11:15 AM
hello we'r in january zoom is soft. ill try reg tables soon tho ty
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 01:53 AM
Go fish
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 07:55 AM
if zoom has same volume how has it become more fishy?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaomai888
if zoom has same volume how has it become more fishy?
A lot of breakeven regs don't play anymore, but the weaker players still do.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 02:36 PM
If that were true volume would be down.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 03:01 PM
Sorry for asking simple questions, but what's the reward of completing 5 steps this month? What if you don't complete? Will that have an effect on your yearly RB or something?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-16-2016 , 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishtankz
? What if you don't complete? Will that have an effect on your yearly RB or something?
No, if you r sn(e)
Yes, if you r lower tier
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-28-2016 , 08:44 PM
Oh hello CaptainDigby

*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-28-2016 , 08:51 PM
Anyone have any idea how exactly they determine if an account is running a bot or not?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-28-2016 , 10:38 PM
use google maps to see if account address goes to a belarussian computer farm
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-29-2016 , 03:00 AM
Supposedly Romulaz can't accept funds at the moment either.

*Kalben also can't receive funds.

I know Rom posts here on 2+2 so maybe he can comment.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-29-2016 , 03:31 AM
Wat is he supposed to say? "Ohh well, it was nice while it lasted?"

I never really gave a **** about bots and watnot but its just so siq that possibly every 3rd soviet crusher was using strong ingame advice aka dreammachine+. Always put me off how all those guys came fairly late to teh party and crushed from teh getgo but always shrugged it off. After lately seeing wat russian coders are able to do im not that surprised anymoar tbh
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
01-29-2016 , 04:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimStone
Wat is he supposed to say? "Ohh well, it was nice while it lasted?"

I never really gave a **** about bots and watnot but its just so siq that possibly every 3rd soviet crusher was using strong ingame advice aka dreammachine+. Always put me off how all those guys came fairly late to teh party and crushed from teh getgo but always shrugged it off. After lately seeing wat russian coders are able to do im not that surprised anymoar tbh
That's just dumb lol.

Ok well i've done some research and have found a list of accounts (95% russian) that are no longer able to receive real money transfers and I suspect have their accounts currently blocked. There is a possibility that some of these players may be from estonia/portugal and unable to receive transfers, in which case just let me know and will edit the list. Feel free to double check some of these in case i made a mistake but it looks like we have a bit of a problem:/

belowtail
kalben
romulaz
captaindigby




gunzreal
got_nuts999
kalushabwaly
easygamerr

Muladkhara



mystyficator
GOmoneyGOV
Dynomiter888


BarackKOmaha
RAidakCo
taktaaak
afor2nado



I've highlighted some people of note.

Last edited by pontylad; 02-13-2016 at 05:23 PM.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote

      
m