Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** *** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread ***

09-29-2016 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NL Loki
Lol I know 20bb/100 is impossible long term. A normal win rate would be like 2-4bb/100 at this stake.

I just want to know how I can track zoom results because the sites that track only cover reg tables. I wanted to know if the player in question is a good reg
Pretty easy answer is you can't track zoom results without doing anything questionable. You can ask around any 100nlz regs you know, or ask him to prove his graphs are authentic and that he hasn't "BS"ed them, but others in this thread have already given you good advice, that 20bb/100 is obviously not realistic and if it were, why would he need staking. If he is crushing at even 5bb/100 he is unlikely to need staking tbh
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
09-30-2016 , 05:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Paleface
He seems pretty decent by 100z standards, but yeah, I wouldn't believe someone who brags about winrates openly in the chatbox
He brags openly in the chatbox?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
09-30-2016 , 10:39 AM
Just assumed that's how you first communicated. My bad
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
09-30-2016 , 07:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
yeah, even 0.10bb/100 is extremely unlikely
fyp
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
09-30-2016 , 08:21 PM
Alright i never asked you for backing first of all, and 2nd of all im not running at 20bb/100 - more like 10bb

and yes im crushing the ****ing fishregfest that is 100z
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
09-30-2016 , 11:20 PM
over what kind of sample, because if you beat it for 10bb then there's absolutely no reason not to move up
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 03:25 AM
when people say I'm crushing with no sample size. I would treat that as beating certain stake at >6bb over >250k hands.

otherwise, they should just say I crushed 100z at 10bb+ over 50k/100k or so.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 06:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRAIBaby
Alright i never asked you for backing first of all, and 2nd of all im not running at 20bb/100 - more like 10bb

and yes im crushing the ****ing fishregfest that is 100z
[] top 100z reg
[] 10bb over >300k sample
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 09:52 AM
Dat ego though. Wont end well once teh heat is gun
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 10:49 AM
Apologies to the delicate flowers itt of whom i might have hurt the feelings of somehow.

I just came back from a long online break and am going to give my best to crush the midstakes. At the moment last month over 150kish hands I hav been beating 100z for 10bb/100. Im not saying im perfect and I have a lot of things to work on still I beleive, but nonetheless most 100z regs have very obvious leaks that they shouldnt have at these stakes. Hope youre happy and see you at the tables.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
over what kind of sample, because if you beat it for 10bb then there's absolutely no reason not to move up
Why move up? Just open 4 tables (1000 hands an hour), $100 an hour + rakeback. Downswings would be almost non-existent at such a high win rate. You could make over $200k a year if you put in decent hours.

But I think he's either running very hot or lying. Can the top high stakes crushers (otb_redbaron, 0human0 etc.) beat 100z for 10bb/100?
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 11:36 AM
yes lol
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 12:25 PM
100z is softer than ppl think if u have the know-how. Half of the regs there are pretty much randomly clicking btns from a gto sense, but for newcomers the barrier to entry is still pretty high (reg table bumhunters are still going to get crushed bc they suck even more). Same thing in 200z (although not as much). For those reasons there are ppl who are printing constantly there and who are not moving up. Havent played much w craibaby, but he seems solid enough to be a winning player.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 02:54 PM
no way otb can beat 100z for 10bb
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by woolly
no way otb can beat 100z for 10bb
Υ not even breakeven imo
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-01-2016 , 07:46 PM
only Bazof has a WR at 100z
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-02-2016 , 12:18 AM
yeah I don't feel 10bb is sustainable for anyone with the rake there, I mean fishes on zoom tend to lose slower than on reg tables because of fast fold implications

but IF anyone was winning at 10bb they would usually move up pretty quickly so it won't really be verified
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-02-2016 , 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssg
when people say I'm crushing with no sample size. I would treat that as beating certain stake at >6bb over >250k hands.

otherwise, they should just say I crushed 100z at 10bb+ over 50k/100k or so.
hey sweet almost there in part time poker from zoom 200 this year, only 50k hands to go LOLOLOL
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-03-2016 , 10:50 PM
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/54...-rope-1632103/

interesting turn of event for the 10bb winner
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-03-2016 , 11:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fayth
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/54...-rope-1632103/

interesting turn of event for the 10bb winner
ahahaha wow

its easy to sustain dat 10bb as long as you dont play more then 40k hands, at least he's got that steady eddie 100k hands to 500z to count on
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-03-2016 , 11:58 PM
Thats teh beauty w every single one of those big ego muppets i see. They have no clue about variance, they have no idea how hot they really run, they cant even imagine what running bad means and they all will end up entirely broken.
Reading their poasts and looking at their no-sample garphs brings amusement to me bc after 8 years in tis biz you know once teh heat is gone everything they believed in will come crashing down
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-04-2016 , 12:14 AM
is it just me or has star withdrawl has really slowed down?

used to be around 1day, now it's like 5days. I use visa
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-04-2016 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssg
is it just me or has star withdrawl has really slowed down?

used to be around 1day, now it's like 5days. I use visa
I just cashed out today via Neteller & VISA and I was surprised how fast the process was.
Neteller was instant. VISA processing takes a few days, but I think it's done from Stars side.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-04-2016 , 01:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimStone
Thats teh beauty w every single one of those big ego muppets i see. They have no clue about variance, they have no idea how hot they really run, they cant even imagine what running bad means and they all will end up entirely broken.
Reading their poasts and looking at their no-sample garphs brings amusement to me bc after 8 years in tis biz you know once teh heat is gone everything they believed in will come crashing down
Agree. It's a nice thing to watch as a low-energy bumhunter.
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote
10-04-2016 , 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimStone
Thats teh beauty w every single one of those big ego muppets i see. They have no clue about variance, they have no idea how hot they really run, they cant even imagine what running bad means and they all will end up entirely broken.
Reading their poasts and looking at their no-sample garphs brings amusement to me bc after 8 years in tis biz you know once teh heat is gone everything they believed in will come crashing down
rofllllllll how's 50nl there timmy
*** Official PokerStars Regulars Thread *** Quote

      
m